Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(9,939 posts)
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:33 PM Jan 2012

Ohio official admits possible link between fracking and earthquakes; bans disposal injection

Official: 4 Ohio fluid-injection wells cannot open in wake of quake
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/01/us/ohio-earthquake/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

(CNN) -- State leaders have ordered that four fluid-injection wells in eastern Ohio will be "indefinitely" prohibited from opening in the aftermath of heightened seismic activity in the area, an official said.

Ohio Department of Natural Resources Director James Zehringer had announced on Friday that one such well -- which injects "fluid deep underground into porous rock formations, such as sandstone or limestone, or into or below the shallow soil layer," the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency explains -- was closed after a series of small earthquakes in and around Youngstown.

Then on Saturday, a magnitude 4.0 earthquake struck that released at least 40 times more energy than any of the previous 10 or more tremors that had rattled the region in 2011.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio official admits possible link between fracking and earthquakes; bans disposal injection (Original Post) garybeck Jan 2012 OP
Really! FarPoint Jan 2012 #1
It will have little efect on Kasich and his oil cronies plans to'drill in stste parks liberal N proud Jan 2012 #9
Kasich and Walker..... FarPoint Jan 2012 #17
So they are closing the disposal wells but DURHAM D Jan 2012 #2
I think they still have another 177 injection wells open for business. limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #6
Wow - what an interesting article. DURHAM D Jan 2012 #13
I'm guessing there are going to be alot more wells opening up. limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #15
can you explain the difference? garybeck Jan 2012 #7
Someone else could probably do it better. DURHAM D Jan 2012 #10
Logically speaking, the fracking would cause earthquakes, not unpressurized waste material garybeck Jan 2012 #12
I just read the article posted above. DURHAM D Jan 2012 #14
Fracking involves hydraulic pressure to break up shale formations and release trapped resources Major Nikon Jan 2012 #18
thx 4 the link. Looks like they did not ban fracking, just disposal injection, and only at 4 sites. limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #3
you're right.... garybeck Jan 2012 #5
Here is an article from the Youngstown, Ohio newspaper: icymist Jan 2012 #4
I forgot where I saw this but Shankapotomus Jan 2012 #19
Also found this article out of Columbus/ they found a new fault line? icymist Jan 2012 #8
And it's actually even called "fracking." We're living in a satirical cartoon. DirkGently Jan 2012 #11
The f'ing repukes in this state won't be happy Doremus Jan 2012 #16
"Ohio Department of Natural Resources Director James Zehringer" greiner3 Jan 2012 #20

FarPoint

(12,287 posts)
17. Kasich and Walker.....
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 07:44 AM
Jan 2012

They are the twin governors. They practice hatchet government style ....nothing is for the people that they govern.

DURHAM D

(32,606 posts)
2. So they are closing the disposal wells but
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:44 PM
Jan 2012

what about stopping the fracking?

JFTR - closing the injection wells just means they will call in the truckers and they will just end up illegally dumping in the creeks and rivers. Maybe Ohio should buy a couple drones to keep track of the sludge haulers.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
6. I think they still have another 177 injection wells open for business.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:58 PM
Jan 2012

So they'll probably just haul it to another county.

here's a map, copy and paste to see, can't get image to show because link has funny characters...

www.ohio.com/polopoly_fs/1.238345.1317660906!/menu/standard/file/1inject02%28web%29.jpg

source:
http://www.ohio.com/news/local/millions-of-barrels-of-drilling-wastes-injected-below-akron-canton-area-1.238216

DURHAM D

(32,606 posts)
13. Wow - what an interesting article.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:43 AM
Jan 2012

Half of the injected materials is being brought into Ohio from Pennsylvania because they don't have a way to dispose of it there. I question the comment that Ohio can't ban this practice because it would be unconstitutional. I thought every state had its own rules about oil/gas drilling, production, disposal, etc.

177 disposal wells is not very many for the whole state given the amount of drilling going on there. I also see that the waste is being dumped under pressure. That is also interesting.

What a nightmare.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
15. I'm guessing there are going to be alot more wells opening up.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:26 AM
Jan 2012

As fracking increases in the region, I guess they'll need a place to dump the waste.


"Ohio cannot ban such shipments from other states because they are protected under the U.S. Constitution."

I dunno that might be true, Interstate Commerce Clause maybe?
Still sounds like an excuse, Ohio should be able to ban it for public health reasons. If states can ban bottle rocket fireworks on the 4th of July, I'm pretty sure they can ban this toxic crap. I believe WV and NY are also accepting PA's wastewater for injection.

garybeck

(9,939 posts)
7. can you explain the difference?
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:00 AM
Jan 2012

the article says the process injects "fluid deep underground into porous rock formations, such as sandstone or limestone, or into or below the shallow soil layer,"

isn't that fracking?

DURHAM D

(32,606 posts)
10. Someone else could probably do it better.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:25 AM
Jan 2012

My knowledge is about 40 years old. I grew up in an oil/gas producing area. All of the injection (disposal) wells were either originally wells that were dry holes or they tapped out after years of production. In the production of oil there is always waste that needs to be disposed of some how. So, they put the trash back down in the ground in these old wells. It is not under pressure but god only knows where it might end up. The other alternative is to pay to have it hauled off by truck. Well actually they used to create slush ponds over several acres to hold it but that was really stupid and they stopped it decades ago.

I recently reviewed a lease that my grandfather signed back in the 50s to allow a couple of producers to use a dry hole on one of his 80s for disposal. Its in the middle of a wheat field. Today eight wells are still piping there waste into that old dry hole. They pay us a monthly fee for the privilege. To my knowledge we have never had any sort of environmental accident.

Fracking requires a tremendous amount of water (and chemicals) used during the drilling/fracking process. This toxic mix is then brought back up out of the ground and must be disposed of. Given that these are new fields it is possible they don't have enough dry holes so they are drilling new holes just for the purpose of disposing of the waste. I don't really know.

Think of the injection well as a giant waste container under ground. I am truly more afraid of the fracking under pressure than the waste wells when it comes to earthquakes.

My fear is that this decision is an effort to say "look over here - not over there".

garybeck

(9,939 posts)
12. Logically speaking, the fracking would cause earthquakes, not unpressurized waste material
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:42 AM
Jan 2012

I can't think of any reason that unpressurized waste could cause earthquakes.

But pressurized fracking? It makes all the sense in the world.

I think you're probably right, if they're trying to blame the earthquakes on the disposal wells, it's probably a diversion tactic... but I don't think it would work in the long run. If they ban the disposal wells and the earthquakes keep happening near fracking sites.... it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out.

thanks for the explanation. I actually did understand that, but I think what threw me off is that it's just illogical to think the disposal wells would cause the earthquakes so I assumed they were talking about the fracking itself. There I go again, being logical. Gotta slap myself sometimes.

DURHAM D

(32,606 posts)
14. I just read the article posted above.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:45 AM
Jan 2012

It does say the disposal wells are under pressure. I guess that is because of the depth. Maybe the dry holes or tapped out wells they are using in Ohio are very deep.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
18. Fracking involves hydraulic pressure to break up shale formations and release trapped resources
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 07:54 AM
Jan 2012

Simply pumping fluids underground isn't the same thing

icymist

(15,888 posts)
4. Here is an article from the Youngstown, Ohio newspaper:
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:55 PM
Jan 2012

Ohio bans injection wells near D&L site in Youngstown

The Mahoning Valley ended 2011 with a deafening bang.

The new year promises to be more quiet.

After a 4.0 magnitude earthquake struck shortly after 3 p.m. on New Year’s Eve, Ohio banned injection wells within five miles of a Youngstown brine-injection well suspected of causing 11 earthquakes this year.
http://www.vindy.com/news/2012/jan/01/ohio-bans-injection-wells-near-dl-site-youngstown/

<snip>
Ray Beiersdorfer, a geology professor at Youngstown State University, said that brine water injected deep into the ground can act as a lubricant between underground formations. Under normal circumstances, the formations are held together by the weight of the formations above and by the force of gravity. But add the brine as a lubricant, and those formations — in this instance the Mt. Simon and Precambrian — can then shift on top of each other, causing an earthquake.

It is not known if the D&L well caused any of the earthquakes, but the state on Friday told D&L to cease operations to run radioactive tests and plug the bottom 250 feet of the well.

~~~~
Radioactive tests? What are they doing that's radioactive?

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
19. I forgot where I saw this but
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 08:07 AM
Jan 2012

but it has been suggested that fracking could or has already caused the release of underground radioactive elements into ground water. I guess that's what the tests were for.

icymist

(15,888 posts)
8. Also found this article out of Columbus/ they found a new fault line?
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:07 AM
Jan 2012

State links northeast Ohio quakes to injection wells

The Kasich administration has put a temporary stop to the disposal of waste from oil and natural-gas drilling in wells within a 5-mile radius of a particular Youngstown well — a well believed to be the cause of 11 earthquakes since March, including a 4.0 quake that struck around 3 p.m. yesterday.

Officials from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources think that waste pumped into the Youngstown-area well, referred to as Northstar No. 1, has been seeping into a previously unknown fault line in eastern Ohio, causing the seismic activity. The moratorium, issued yesterday by Jim Zehringer, the Natural Resources Department’s director, affects four other injection wells.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2011/12/31/new-quakes.html

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
16. The f'ing repukes in this state won't be happy
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:38 AM
Jan 2012

until they've bled it dry and left it a putrid, rotting corpse.

They've nearly succeeded.

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
20. "Ohio Department of Natural Resources Director James Zehringer"
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 08:52 AM
Jan 2012

Will be resigning for 'personal,' or 'health related' or any number of reasons; SOON.

RIP James!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ohio official admits poss...