General Discussion

catbyte

(34,341 posts) Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:32 PM Mar 2018

Twitler bit off more than he could chew when he attacked Alec Baldwin. Again.

Link to tweet

-----------------------
Ouch!

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Twitler bit off more than he could chew when he attacked Alec Baldwin. Again. (Original Post) catbyte Mar 2018 OP

LMAO shenmue Mar 2018 #1

Is that why twitler deleted Cha Mar 2018 #2

No. He only deleted the one with the dumbass misspellings. He re-tweeted it with corrections. catbyte Mar 2018 #4

Oh.. the one that showed pospotus Cha Mar 2018 #5

Too good malaise Mar 2018 #3

Not sure. His twisted little mind will turn your comments into fandom. POOR BOY! erronis Mar 2018 #6

Back to back zingers. A++ on the, have your wife stop calling me, zing. sarcasmo Mar 2018 #7

shenmue

(38,506 posts)

1. LMAO

Reply to catbyte (Original post)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:33 PM

Mar 2018

Cha

(296,868 posts)

2. Is that why twitler deleted

Reply to catbyte (Original post)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:34 PM

Mar 2018

his post?

catbyte

(34,341 posts)

4. No. He only deleted the one with the dumbass misspellings. He re-tweeted it with corrections.

Reply to Cha (Reply #2)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:42 PM

Mar 2018

Cha

(296,868 posts)

5. Oh.. the one that showed pospotus

Reply to catbyte (Reply #4)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 10:00 PM

Mar 2018

can't spell worth a damn.. I see.

I meant to say "deleted his tweet" in the post above.

Mahalo, catbyte!

malaise

(268,717 posts)

3. Too good

Reply to catbyte (Original post)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:38 PM

Mar 2018

This is the only way to deal with the Con - demean and insult - he hates it.

erronis

(15,185 posts)

6. Not sure. His twisted little mind will turn your comments into fandom. POOR BOY!

Reply to malaise (Reply #3)

Fri Mar 2, 2018, 11:24 PM

Mar 2018

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)

7. Back to back zingers. A++ on the, have your wife stop calling me, zing.

Reply to catbyte (Original post)

Sat Mar 3, 2018, 12:27 AM

Mar 2018

Reply to this discussion