Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 06:58 PM Mar 2018

Hey Nunberg, remember McDougal? She spent 18 months in jail for contempt.

Last edited Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:30 PM - Edit history (1)

On edit: Nunberg is alleging that it isn't fair because they are only considering contempt against Republicans and not Democrats and refers to Clinton. Everyone on the Clinton campaign cooperated with the FBI in all respects (and there was no grand jury). The most egregious use of civil contempt for partisan reasons is when Starr jailed McDougal for 18 months when he couldn't force her to lie.

I had to look up contumacious.

con·tu·ma·cious /ˌkänt(y)o͝oˈmāSHəs/

adjective: contumacious

(especially of a defendant's behavior) stubbornly or willfully disobedient to authority.


https://lawfareblog.com/sam-nunbergs-media-meltdown

Lawfare: “It is an understatement to say that Sam Nunberg is playing with fire.”

“Nunberg, a longtime Trump adviser and former campaign aide who is on the outs with the president, went on a bizarre rampage of media appearances Monday afternoon in which he mocked Special Counsel Robert Mueller, declared his intention to not cooperate before the grand jury in the Russia investigation, and appeared to speculate wildly on President Trump’s involvement, or lack thereof, in wrongdoing during the campaign…”

“The point is that federal prosecutors have robust powers to deal with recalcitrant witnesses, and special prosecutors in high-stakes matters involving the president of the United States have particular incentives not to tolerate contumacious conduct on the part of witnesses they subpoena. Nunberg may think it would be ‘funny if they arrested me.’ We suspect he’ll find it less so if and when ‘they’ actually do.”

. . .

McDougal spent 18 months in jail on the contempt charges—the maximum allowed under the contempt statute—as the court sought to compel her testimony. But Starr wasn’t done. Civil contempt is about coercion, not punishment. After her civil contempt detention was finished, he sought and received a grand jury indictment against McDougal for criminal contempt (criminal contempt is about punishment of the crime of contempt of court) and obstruction of justice as well.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey Nunberg, remember McDougal? She spent 18 months in jail for contempt. (Original Post) grantcart Mar 2018 OP
he will be in jail in 2 days making all new kinds of pals if you know what I mean. beachbum bob Mar 2018 #1
Trump attracts interesting people PJMcK Mar 2018 #2
Has he been arrested yet? ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #3
If I recall correctly, Susan McDougal did testify. louis-t Mar 2018 #4
I think that she refused to testify because during the proffer they insisted that she affirm grantcart Mar 2018 #6
Read her autobiography PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2018 #5
Nunberg is saying that there is a double standard that they are only prosecuting Republicans grantcart Mar 2018 #8
Right, I couldn't recall the exact details. louis-t Mar 2018 #9
What About JUdith Miller Me. Mar 2018 #7
 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
1. he will be in jail in 2 days making all new kinds of pals if you know what I mean.
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:04 PM
Mar 2018

You don't do a throw down at a federal prosecutor or ignore a grand jury subpoena...

its contempt of court, no trial, no hearing and off you go until you fucking cooperate. I hope Mueller finds the worse federal detention center he can to make an example of this asshole

louis-t

(23,273 posts)
4. If I recall correctly, Susan McDougal did testify.
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:09 PM
Mar 2018

She kept saying they were trying to get her to say something about Clinton she says wasn't true. Have to look that up.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
6. I think that she refused to testify because during the proffer they insisted that she affirm
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:11 PM
Mar 2018

statements that were not true and they wouldn't give her immunity.

She then advertised that she would rather go to jail than lie.

By the way she was found innocent on criminal contempt

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
5. Read her autobiography
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:09 PM
Mar 2018
The Woman Who Wouldn't Talk. Very enlightening. She knew that Starr was hell-bent on destroying her, and she says she was encouraged to lie about having an affair with Clinton to avoid jail time. She wouldn't lie. She cannot be compared to Nunberg.

I saw her speak when she was on tour promoting that book. She's an absolutely amazing woman.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
8. Nunberg is saying that there is a double standard that they are only prosecuting Republicans
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:27 PM
Mar 2018

for contempt.

Obviously that is not true.

Not only was she very credible she was found innocent on criminal contempt charges.

louis-t

(23,273 posts)
9. Right, I couldn't recall the exact details.
Mon Mar 5, 2018, 07:28 PM
Mar 2018

I don't think Starr was so hell bent on destroying her, more like he was hell bent on destroying Clinton and was manipulating her to help him do it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey Nunberg, remember McD...