General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCA-SEN: Sanders wont endorse Feinstein
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) says he will not endorse Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) ahead of her primary in California.
Though Sanders has put himself in the middle of other primaries in this cycle, hes steering clear of California, where Feinstein is being challenged from the left.
Its an issue for the people of California, Sanders told The Hill.
Asked if that meant he would stay out of the race, Sanders responded, yeah.
While Sanders says the California race is for the people of that state to decide, on Thursday he announced that he would back liberal candidate Marie Newman in her primary challenge against seven-term Democratic incumbent Rep. Daniel Lipinski (Ill.).
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/377619-sanders-wont-endorse-feinstein
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)WHAT THE CRAP KINDA LEADER IS HE. Diane Feinstein is a tremendous Democrat.
How dare he not support her. And he wants OUR support ???
makes me very upset and sad that our strong women are not being supported.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)At least I think it's four. I may be off by one or two in either direction. The point is that this is NOT a Democrat versus Republican race in which Bernie is callously disdaining a Democrat and thus letting a Tea Partier represent California, which is what some of the poutrage in this thread would suggest.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)The OP points to one such instance.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The argument you answered even though I didn't make it: Bernie didn't endorse Feinstein because he never endorses one Democrat against another.
Now for the actual context. In #40, trueblue2007 took the premise that Bernie didn't endorse Feinstein and leapt to the conclusion that "BERNIE DOESNT SUPPORT DEMS !!" There was an insinuation that Bernie doesn't support Democrats against Republicans. I refuted that by pointing out that Feinstein is running against other Democrats. There are five (or so) Democrats in the race. Anyone who endorses one of the Democrats is therefore failing to support four Democrats.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Neutral on the California race. I will open myself up for attacks with this, but I prefer that our party move on to younger officeholders.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)murielm99
(30,733 posts)or this is simply outside meddling.
Go do your job in Washington, Bernie. The people of California and Illinois don't need you to tell them what to do.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Its an issue for the people of California, Sanders told The Hill.
Asked if that meant he would stay out of the race, Sanders responded, yeah.
That is what you call meddling? What would you have called it if he had instead endorsed Feinstein or her Democratic primary opponent?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)murielm99
(30,733 posts)Why is he endorsing anyone at all? Under any circumstances? Who is he to do that? And you know damn well that he has made endorsements. There have been posts about it on this board. Whether he decides to endorse, or stay out of this race, he has meddled in other races that are upcoming.
My Senators, Durbin and Duckworth, do not gallivant around the country making endorsements and pronouncements. They go to Washington, do their work, and come home. Sanders, who is not a Democrat, should not even be asked this question. Maybe if he joins the party he might be entitled to an opinion, but he still should not be making endorsements or announcing that he will get out of the way. What an ego!
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I'm no fan of Bernie, voted for Hillary in the primary, but if he endorsed Dianne, the same people would be saying it's none of his business as he's not a Democrat.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Who knows? Its pretty laughable to criticize him when even The California Democratic Party cant come to a consensus.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I dont know anyone on this board who shouldnt want him gone in a heavily safe Democratic district with no legitimate Republican challenger.
Feinstein has a legitimate challenger who is apparently a fine Democrat. Id prefer she win but I have no problem with good Democrats running for office, especially in a state where no Republican is ever going to win statewide. Lets have a good primary with real choices.
And why do you want his endorsement any way? You clearly hate the guy. Im not sure what you are asking for
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)who is STILL not a Democrat but IS a hypocrite.
If he doesn't want to endorse Feinstein, that's his little red wagon. He should just say so. But it's laughable for him or anyone else to suggest that his refusal to endorse her has anything to do with a desire not to meddle in a Democratic primary, since that hasn't stopped him from getting involved in other primaries.
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)and a lot of that power has to do with her seniority. This will almost certainly be her last election. As much distaste as I have for her, I still want to see her continue in her role on the Appropriations, Judiciary and Intelligence Committees. . .
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Trump has not endorsed her either
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Kind of funny, and not in a ha ha way....
David__77
(23,372 posts)Im a registered Democrat in California, and anticipate voting for another Democrat.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)literally voted to support someone other than Feinstein. Sanders is staying neutral. Why is that a problem?
Me.
(35,454 posts)and while De Leon garnered more votes at the convention, statewide she is ahead of him by 30 points.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Yup, I expect Feinstein will win, and I have no problem with Sanders staying out of it.
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)Response to Nanjeanne (Reply #23)
Eliot Rosewater This message was self-deleted by its author.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)But Feinstein came in second there. That's just the facts, nothing more nothing less. I'm not arguing against supporting Feinstein, just pointing out that a minority of the Democratic Convention did. The Convention made no endorsement, and neither did Sanders. To read some of the posts on this thread one might get the mistaken impression that Bernie Sanders was out there personally organizing violent street protests against Diane Feinstein.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)if he REALLY stayed neutral. But he's going around the country picking and choosing which primary candidates he's going to endorse and which he's not going to endorse. So withholding his endorsement of Feinstein is not staying neutral. He's making a statement against her by refusing to endorse her when he has no problem endorsing other candidates.
trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)and a great lady like Diane Feinstein should be supported.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Get a clue folks. He is desperately holding them together for a reason. The time for progressive state governments, parties and the DNC to make changes was last year.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 9, 2018, 07:53 PM - Edit history (1)
because frankly, that's how this article reads.
https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Bernie_Sanders
DrDan
(20,411 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Rather than supporting generally the Democrats running in the primary.
Me.
(35,454 posts)He won't endorse but he will endorse.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)getting involved in our primaries?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Even though he isn't anymore, he still gets to tell Dems what to do and how to think... or are you one of those elitists?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)since I don't give a crap what he thinks. To each his/her own.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)He should be looking after his own house, namely Nina Turner. Now there is someone as nefarious as they get.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)from bernie threads. My disgust simply shines through.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)he's running to be their nominee. Otherwise, he's an independent, thank you very much.
I could do without him at this point.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Run as an independent, remain an independent. Run as a Dem, remain relevant to the Dem party. I don't understand it. The only thing it has caused is divisiveness. And he seems to either be blissfully unaware of the divisiveness or not to give a damn about it.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)looks like Feinsteins turn. Bashing Democrats is $$$$.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)This is laughable!
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)The California Democratic party declined to endorse her and he is just following the official party position. It seems that many who attack him for not being a Democrat are in fact not being a Democrat themselves.
Feinstein loses California Democratic Partys endorsement
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/02/25/feinstein-loses-california-democratic-partys-endorsement/?utm_term=.0de3993b2969
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"he is just following the official party position...
That's not accurate. He's making an endorsement. The CA Democratic party is not endorsing the same. Hence, he's not following their position... unless of course, you broaden the definition of position to the point of meaninglessness.
Bless your heart. You do try.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You write, "He's making an endorsement." The OP is directly to the contrary. He's not making an endorsement.
You seem to think that "I'm not endorsing Feinstein" means "I'm endorsing her opponent." Even if she had only one opponent, that wouldn't make sense. It's particularly wrong here, where she has multiple opponents.
If you think he's making some kind of covert endorsement, please enlighten us as to whom he's supposedly endorsing.
Wwcd
(6,288 posts)When asked why he joined the Dem Party his response was, "for Media & Money".
How is that being a "good Democrat", again?
Btw, is there a D after his name?
No.
Stop calling him something he won't even call himself.
trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Is it not?
Me.
(35,454 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Doodley
(9,088 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)Got old about 2 years ago.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)beaglelover
(3,466 posts)Senate or not. He can go pee up a rope for all I care.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In most states with Senate races this year, there will be a Democratic nominee but there isn't yet. I know we have a nominee in Texas. Offhand I don't know of any other primaries that have been held.
"Feinstein is favored to be one of the top two finishers in a nonpartisan primary" does not equal "Feinstein has finished in the top two in the primary that hasn't been held yet" which in turn does not equal "Feinstein is the Democratic nominee." In 2016 there was no Democratic nominee, or there were two of them, depending on how you want to look at it. (I'd say there was none because California has abandoned partisan primaries except for President.)
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)On second thought, she's probably relieved. His endorsement has been the kiss of death for several candidates.
Stinky The Clown
(67,790 posts)Please?
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Post removed
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)Can you actually make that case, or do you just like saying shit that sounds good to you?
For that matter, are you even accurate that he has endorsed his own Son? Here's one of a couple articles I've found.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/bernie-sanders-very-proud-of-his-son-running-for-congress-leaves-out-endorsement/
I haven't seen anything more recent. If you have one, I'd love to see it.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Well, I mean, she must be, right? Because Bernie endorsed Lipinski's opponent and Bernie applies his purity tests only on women.
I guess "Dan" is short for "Danielle".
JCanete
(5,272 posts)mcar
(42,302 posts)I await several OPs on whether Angus King endorsed another state's senator or not.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)I can't believe anybody is still buying his crap.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)ornotna
(10,799 posts)Get a grip people.