Ron Baiman (Ph. D.): U.S. 2016 Unadjusted Exit Poll Discrepancies.... (Affadavit)

[triron]

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319205877_Updated_Expanded_and_Corrected_Affidavit_Version_US_2016_Unadjusted_Exit_Poll_Discrepancies_Fit_Chronic_Republican_Vote_-_Count_Rigging_not_Random_Statistical_Patterns

You should really read this. It's findings are startling for both the Presidential and Senate races.

[cloudbase]

1. I'd like to see the data confirmed by

a panel of other statisticians.

[Igel]

2. I suspect the data are good.

I suspect that the interpretation isn't.

The key is the word "unadjusted." In the absence of a random sample, you need to adjust the data. Just declaring what's known to be non-random to be random doesn't cut it.

[triron]

3. 'Adjust' it to what? How would that make it more random?

The author is trained in mathematics and statistics. Why don't you address your criticism to him?

[RandomAccess]

4. Read it.

[rgbecker]

7. The term Unadjusted in this case refers to the fact that the exit polling outfit

adjusts their numbers, as the election evening goes along, to reflect the actual Vote Count.

Biggest problem that I see is that the polling company does not release their unadjusted numbers and the professor must rely on getting screen shots of polling results during the evening.

It is so crazy. Why doesn't somebody with some integrity conduct an exit poll and really let people know what is going on. Some how the UN or US government conducts such polling in numerous foreign countries but we get nothing and are supposed to trust the Media and State govenrments to give us honest results.

[RandomAccess]

9. That actually began with the 2000 Presidential election

when media news outlets determined they apparently couldn't admit to election fraud right here in the U.S. and so started adjusting their exit polling "results" to fit the actual election results. It's been downhill ever since.

[RandomAccess]

5. Thank you, thank you, thank you

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!

Did I say "thank you" yet?

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!

[triron]

6. You are very welcome.

You said it: "Read it".

[brush]

8. To your "THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU" I assume you're confirming "STOLEN, STOLEN, STOLEN"?

[triron]

10. knr