Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,816 posts)
Mon Mar 12, 2018, 10:46 PM Mar 2018

More WTF? Madness: Secretaries of state slam provision to allow Secret Service at polling places

Washington (CNN)More than a dozen secretaries of state slammed a rider attached to legislation to reauthorize the Department of Homeland Security that would allow Secret Service to be dispatched to polling places nationwide during a federal election.

"This is an alarming proposal which raises the possibility that armed federal agents will be patrolling neighborhood precincts and vote centers," according to the letter, which was obtained by CNN.

In the letter, which was sent Friday to Senate leaders Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, and Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, the 19 secretaries of state write that they believe the proposal is "unprecedented and shocking."

"Secretaries of State across the country agree that there is no discernable need for federal Secret Service agents to intrude, at the discretion of the president, who may also be a candidate in that election, into the thousands of citadels where democracy is enshrined," they wrote.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/secret-service-polling-places-white-house-elections/index.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More WTF? Madness: Secretaries of state slam provision to allow Secret Service at polling places (Original Post) spanone Mar 2018 OP
No federal agents dflprincess Mar 2018 #1
Not even tirebiter Mar 2018 #2
Oh! I vote for that as well! ProudLib72 Mar 2018 #4
observers only! bluestarone Mar 2018 #3

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
4. Oh! I vote for that as well!
Mon Mar 12, 2018, 11:32 PM
Mar 2018

Maybe they could inspect the voting equipment beforehand? Maybe count votes by hand too (since no one else seems capable)?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More WTF? Madness: Secre...