Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsImportant read - Josh Marshall, TPM "Trumps Dangerous Allegiance Threatens Every One of Us"
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trumps-dangerous-allegiance-threatens-every-one-of-usYesterday, after news broke that Rex Tillerson had been fired and replaced by Mike Pompeo, I heard some voices reassuring themselves that unlike many in the Trump world Pompeo is fairly hostile to Russia. At least, they say, he views Russia through a more traditional Republican prism. This raises a general point that is critical and we all must address. We dont need more hostility toward Russia or more hawkishness. What we need is an un-compromised policy toward Russia. Most specifically, we need an uncompromised President, something we currently do not have.
This is no mere rhetorical point. Russia is a threat. But it is largely a threat because of its weakness, its status as a declining power with cultural and geopolitical ambitions far out of sync with its current reality and most future realities we can credibly envision. That is the centerpiece of Putinism, the aim to reclaim Russias 20th-century preeminence and exact revenge against those he blames for Russias precipitous collapse in the 1980s and 1990s. Putinism is a textbook revanchist worldview and policy agenda. Indeed, we can see it playing out in the crises of the last handful of years. The effort to destabilize Ukraine and seize the Crimean Peninsula speaks for itself. The 2016 election tampering campaign is an even deeper example.
There is a fascinating debate going on now about whether there is such a thing as a Gerasimov Doctrine, a theory of full-spectrum warfare aimed at countering the West. Heres a good introduction to that debate here. What is beyond debate is this: Russia is geographically vast but economically a modest player at best in the scale of the worlds great powers. Russias GDP ranks somewhere between that of Italy and Mexico. Its jarring to recognize that but it is true. Russias military and political leaders realize they simply lack the economic or geopolitical heft to remain a world power in conventional military terms. They simply cant afford it. To maintain the great power or major power status to which Russian elites believe Russia is entitled it must mobilize unconventional tools to do so. Whether this is a doctrine or a more ad hoc strategy of necessity growing out of the experience of last decades color revolutions in Eastern Europe and the Arab Spring, it is the impetus behind Russias increasingly pervasive and aggressive focus on information warfare, subversion, hacking and various efforts to destabilize potential adversaries it cannot dominate or engage with in conventional economic or military terms. (As I wrote way back in August 2016, this Gerasimov Doctrine, growing out of Russian perceptions of the Color Revolutions and the Arab Spring is oddly comparable to conservative perceptions of liberal media hegemony and the creation of Fox News. No really.)
snip
last paragraph
That isnt just a massive indictment of President Trump. Its a great danger for the United States and every American citizen. Because on this critical front not an existential threat, not the only or even necessarily the greatest threat our government is decapitated at the top. We dont know how far this goes. This mini-chemical weapons attack, again, is instructive. My greatest fear with Trump is not so much that he would sell out the US as that his subservience and public lickspittledom would lead Putin to be so aggressive that it would set in motion a chain of events that would be difficult to stop. What if one of those Russian planes buzzing US ships crashes into one? What if Putin kills someone with nerve gas on American soil? What happens then? At some point, inevitably, the U.S. snaps from Trump accommodation to aggressive response. How much of a hold does Russia have over Trump? Can he be driven to inflict willful damage on the United States? We dont know. But our ability to act, in critical decisions and engagements implicating our most essential alliances, is crippled.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 993 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Important read - Josh Marshall, TPM "Trumps Dangerous Allegiance Threatens Every One of Us" (Original Post)
NRaleighLiberal
Mar 2018
OP
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)1. And another worrisome question...
If it looks like he's about to lose his dutiful ally in the White House, either to impeachment or electoral loss, at what point might Putin be driven to "extraordinary measures" to force the U.S. to allow said ally to remain in power?
Cha
(297,154 posts)2. Yeah, I can feel it!