Stormy Daniels Interview is going to backfire so bad

[brettdale]

Its the number one trend on social media, the top trend on twitter, people
are expecting massive things from it, and its going to produce nothing, this
is what happens when you hype things are, her lawyer's tweet today will
do nothing to damper the hype.

The right wing media is going to have a field after this.

People seem to think there are going to a massive amount of evidence produce
that will take down trumpy.

Heck the public on twitter are talking about a Bombshell of evidence.



We need Mueller more than ever, I hope hes close, I hope he is ready to indict,
because tonight changes nothing.

[LonePirate]

1. I agree with it being overhyped. I'm not sure if anything of substance will result from it.

[Sophia4]

63. People watching it in large numbers is the point.

It's not what will be said or not said in the video that matters. It's the simple fact that someone is saying "The emperor has no clothes" to Trump, and we are all watching while that is being said.

I think a lot of people don't understand the store of The Emperor Has No Clothes.

It's going to be hilarious to watch Trump, this very vain, controlling, narcissistic, fool, get told that he is really only a very weak human being. Too weak to withstand the "beauty" of a porn star like Stormy Daniels (even though he is married to a far more beautiful woman who is also the mother of his child).

This is not about sex. Watching the 60 Minutes show is not about sex.

It's about telling Trump in the only language he and his worshipers understand that we know just how weak and careless and egotistical he really is beneath all the bluff.

Someone who sleeps with porn stars, etc. (who knows who else) is president of the United States??

It's one thing to have an affair with someone. It's quite another to sleep with a porn star when you are married and have an infant child. It's about how depraved Trump is, what a fool he is.

[spanone]

2. So, you've already seen it? Tell us about it.

[ProudLib72]

10. She giggles, insinuates...things, and has a CD stuck in her cleavage

Sorry, but I have to agree with the OP. Nothing will come of this besides some very basic titillation and a slew of off color jokes that will last through next week.

[spanone]

24. it will be what it will be.

[exboyfil]

42. Unless the threats or credible

or there is a John Edwards style case against Trump, it really is only interesting to watch the Christian fundies tie themselves into knots trying to support Trump on moral grounds.

[brush]

57. Yeah, noting will come of except the country will see on national TV the porn star the president...

cheated on his pregnant wife with, not to mention the additional trashiness revealed that he was also cheating on his model girlfriend with whom he was also cheating on his wife with.

Nope, nothing whatsoever will come of it except maybe a scattered few women voters .

[ProudLib72]

58. We already knew that

trumpanzees don't care. In fact, they revel in the fact that their man can do anything he damn well pleases. It's the Id administration, and they love him for it.

[brush]

60. I agree about his most ardent supporters but I also believe he'll lose some more of those white...

women voters who went with him in 2016 (double cheating on a pregnant wife is not a good look to women).

Hell, we've already seen that he's bleeding voters in all the special election campaigns repugs have lost in the past year.

Believe me, this won't help the orange pustule at all.

[ProudLib72]

64. If it hurts Donnie, I'm for it

What I'm really against is making Stormy out to be something other than she is. She is selling this interview. She's already said this interview is just the beginning. That is exactly what a strip tease amounts to: show a little and get people throwing money; expose a little more and get some more money, and so on. She is not a good person, and I dislike the performance aspect of this.

[babylonsister]

65. I think she is much brighter than who you portray.

We shall see.

[ProudLib72]

66. Oh, she is smart. She knows how to play her audience

I was trying to make her out to seem coquettish with that description.

[hlthe2b]

3. Look, I have always believed this interview is merely part of her attorney's legal strategy

designed to incite Trump to make yet more self-incriminating or self-damaging responses. THus, it is not really what SHE says, but the fact she is on tv saying it.

That said, I hardly call THAT a "backfire"....

[gratuitous]

4. Spot on

I mean, how many times has Trump talked big only to have the hype blow up in his face? The man has so totally shot his credibility, none of the news outlets even cover him anymore.

Waitasecond.

[dawg day]

5. She's going to talk about Trump's sexual activity

Count on it-- there will be a massive upchuck all over the country, leading to millions of simultaneous toilet flushes and a sudden decrease in water pressure.

Until indictment, ridicule is the best weapon we who are not Mueller have against the pernicious Trump.

I think everyone's going to be talking about it. "Did she really say that? Tighty-whities?"

[Siwsan]

19. That actually happened, once, in the UK

It was after a particularly gripping episode of the soap, Coronation Street. After the show, so many people either flipped on tea kettles, it affected the power grid. I watch the show, broadcast out of Canada, and it was a damn fine bit of story telling and acting.

March 9, 2011
“The Coronation Street serial killing double bill generated a huge power surge across Britain last night.
As millions of viewers digested the latest murder on the famous cobbled streets of Wetherfield a surge measuring 1,500 mega-watts swept the nation.
A spokesman for the National Grid said: “Obviously, there was a huge audience which meant at the end of the programme people were getting up, turning lights on, going to the toilet, opening fridge doors and boiling kettles.

“There was a surge of demand for power for anything between three to four minutes to seven to eight minutes. It’s that concentrated period when a programme finishes and millions of people around the country go and do something else other than watching Coronation Street.”

https://saisinfrablog.wordpress.com/2011/03/10/coronation-streets-victim-the-uk-grid/

[malaise]

6. Most people will be satisfied with watching the Con

humiliated. I don't know what you folks want. Follow the money - that's what needs watching.

[C_U_L8R]

7. Trump will play the victim, again

Convincing no one but his idiot base.

[Hassin Bin Sober]

14. His idiot base loves the idea he "banged" a porn actress.

"Durrrrrrr like a boss!!!!!" -- in trumpanzee speak.

[Eliot Rosewater]

8. I dont disagree that if a republican commits treason, adultery, thieving, that the media will

play it as if it isnt a big deal as will half the country.

I dont know what to expect tonight. We will see.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

9. How did you get to see it early?

[brettdale]

15. The lawyer statement

Note: (a) not all of our evidence will be mentioned/displayed tonight – that would be foolish; (b) we are not sure what CBS will include but we know a lot from the full interview will have to be cut bc of the time allowed; (c) tonight is not the end – it’s the beginning. #basta

Translated:

We have nothing.

[jodymarie aimee]

11. Both Rachel and Lawrence said they are watching it

for their job of course, but L wants to give it ratings to spite FuckFace. That is why I am tuning in. Nothing else on, J Paul Getty new show TRUST doesn't start until 9PM.

[yardwork]

12. The purpose is to stress and worry the orange moran.

That's the only purpose of this interview and it will work. Expect nothing more.

[onetexan]

26. and embarrass the thin skinned idiot

i'm sure he'll be raging later in the wee hours about it

[Miles Archer]

36. Exactly.

That's it. It's a marathon, not a sprint. It's point "A," and that leads to point "B," not point "Z."

Anyone popping corn in anticipation of a bombshell with all of the gory details will most likely be disappointed.

[smirkymonkey]

50. I agree. As long as it chaps his ass, I will consider it successful.

No other purpose is required.

[Kingofalldems]

13. Sorry. Not a good try there.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

30. I wonder if there's a seminar for these kinds of posts.

[FakeNoose]

16. I bet Stormy gets her own reality TV show out of this

... that's all she cares about anyway. She'll never get rich off of Trump, that's for sure.

She might even have to give back the $130,000. Her lawyer is setting her up for a way better deal now.

[Old Vet]

35. Shit, I hope Stormy gets paid big time. Iam sure shes paid her dues in the porn life........

Its a life I wouldn't wish on any woman, How fucked up does a womans life have to be to get into the porn industry?

[mnmoderatedem]

17. I think her lawyer is too smart for that.

he's not going to allow it to be Al Capone's Vaults.

Only thing that worries me is if 60 Minutes conveniently edits things.

[dameatball]

18. I am mostly tuning in to find out which one was wearing the mysterious dress.

[Locutusofborg]

20. I support anything and everything

That serves two purposes:
1) Depresses the potential conservative vote. Stormy Daniels has a chance to do that with social conservative married women.
2) Energizes the potential liberal vote. Stormy Daniels has a chance to do that with just about everybody who is centrist and left of center.
Therefore I'm happy the interview is being televised. The Nielsen Ratings will tell the tale when they're released Monday afternoon.
We have elections these days being decided by coin flips and by less than a thousand votes. Changing one mind can make a difference.
Its not either Mueller OR Stormy. Its Mueller PLUS Stormy plus hundreds of other issues and scandals and bad decisions.

[exboyfil]

44. The fact that he is a libertine is already baked into the cake

The interview will not move that needle.

[Locutusofborg]

61. None of us have a clue

As to what will or won't resonate with any other voter. I'm placing my bet on will inhibit some conservative voters and further motivate some liberal voters.

[RandySF]

21. Thank you for your concern

[karynnj]

22. I agree, because I think all the sex stories are a diversion from Russia

His base is likely split between people who don't care and those who think it is cool. This is as unlikely to bring him down as Clinton stuff did to him.

The serious charges are if he agreed to help Russia with sanctions in exchange for help in the election. If that can be proven - even if it can't be proven their actions helped him, we would be at a Constitutional crisis.

[Tatiana]

56. This has the potential to weaken him politically.

Especially if we ever find out that an abortion was involved with one of his paramours.

We need him weakened if we are going to win back Congress. This can help.

Mueller is our only hope regarding the Russian attacks and we need to get the investigative bodies of Congress functioning again.

The Russian hydra is massive and runs through the Middle East, in some respect. Anything that helps us win back Congress is a good thing, IMO.

[karynnj]

62. Remember he won after the Access Hollywood tapes

.. added to disgusting comments to Howard Stern about watching the Paris Hilton sex tape (though he knew her as a young girl) and his comments about his daughter Ivanka and many other really disgusting things. They voted for him in spite of his failings as a human.

I think we need to defeat him on the issues. Domestically, he needs to actually make life better in the rust belt -- and that is not easy. He actually might make his rural states worse as they may bear the greatest burden of his trade war. Agricultural sales will be hit, while many products they buy will be higher due to our tariffs. Many already see through the tax bill. It was pretty obvious that it did not work in PA. Internationally, we are destroying the alliances with our allies. The middle east is incredibly scary especially with Bolton. (I absolutely disagree with those who think that a heightened risk for war with Iran or actually being at war with them will help Trump. This is not 2002 or 2004, soon after 911 and after a long period with no major war. One of the arguments that Trump sickenly used was that he was against these wars and that HRC would be more hawkish.)

I think our biggest asset might be the TOTAL CHAOS evident in the WH. I suspect that it scares people -- and they should be able to see that with Republican control of Congress there are no checks on Trump. Even without Trump, many have noted that the country often wants divided government - especially after major change.

[Binkie The Clown]

23. Like EVERYTHING in life, the anticipation is far more exciting than the event itself. nt

[R B Garr]

25. I heard she is going to present the threats against her.

I think I heard that on CNN, oops probably MSNBC.

[mr_lebowski]

27. I've been saying for weeks now on DU ... don't get your hopes up, it's gonna be a book promo ...

She ain't gonna say much that's definitive, other than 'teasers' to lead people to the book she's going to write IF she can get out of the NDA.

She may show the physical documents/agreements about the 130K deal, which I think have been available but not everyone in a 60 mins audience is aware of that.

We probably will get some 'clothed' pics in hotel room(s) of the two of them apparently alone together, to establish 'likelihood' that her 'affair' story is true.

We might get her describing threatening behavior from Trumps goons. However without proof, it's very easy for Trump to dispute it saying she has ulterior motives (and honestly, she might) as that's a potential ticket OUT of the agreement and hence to her being able to further monetize her story. So that would mean squat, basically, w/o 'proof'.

Some kind of hint that she either had a kid by him, or better yet, he bribed or forced her to get an abortion ... would probably be BEST for 'our side'. But I really think that at most, that sort of thing would be 'hinted at', along with a 'you might read about something like that in the book ... if I'm allowed to write it, but I cannot confirm or deny it at this time' ... type of deal.

Or MAYBE we'd get to see like the first 10 secs of a pron vid they filmed together, we'd see them still dressed, but it'd be just enough for DT to 'know' ... that she has a copy of him doing some embarrassing stuff, i.e. that will NOT play well with the base ... for example, say, submission or diaper play? There ARE some lines that the base would not be okay with him crossing 'sexually', believe me. She wouldn't mention that part though, other than maybe saying 'it got pretty dirty later, Anderson!'.

That's my prediction for tonight. REALLY doubt we get 'blockbuster' news out of this thing, only hints that their might be 'big news to follow'.

[forthemiddle]

28. Has she been released from the NDA?

I haven’t followed the story to much, but if I understand it, she is still bound by the Non disclosures agreement, correct?

[Miles Archer]

38. I don't believe she has

I believe her attorney is challenging its legality based on the fact that Trump didn't sign it.

[forthemiddle]

48. What lawyer worth his weight

Would participate in this interview while the case is still being argued?
Maybe I’m missing something, but isn’t that pretty stupid?

[cbdo2007]

29. I agree...her main skill is fucking people for money...

Both literally and figuratively...we are the figuratively. Of course trump did all this horrible stuff but stormy knows as soon as she tells all nobody will want to interview her anymore and she'll have to go work at taco Bell or something. For all we know she's in on it with Trump because the more people focus on this and draw this out the less they are talking about Russia, and Trump is obsessed with bragging about his sexual conquests,so you know he's loving this attention.

[RainCaster]

31. What will they do for the other 59 minutes after she describes the act?

[LuckyCharms]

33. I doubt she will get into the sexual details.

The take-away from tonight's interview will be the details of the threats.

[Freethinker65]

32. Her persued her (and others), she eventually agreed, they fucked, they fucked a few more times

He eventually paid her off like he did all of the others.

His attorney knew, her friends knew, Melania knew, Ivanka and spawn knew, no one cared. While running for President his entire campaign knew, the media knew, the GOP knew, his evangelical Christian hands laying supporters knew, and Mike Pence knew. No one cared.

After the 60 Minutes piece, no one will care. Rich bloated men can fuck whoever they want and payoff whoever they want.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

34. Even if it's a small negative it's a negative for Trump.

He had sex with a porn star and exotoc dancer mere months after his wife gave birth and then bribed and threatened her into silence.

[Phoenix61]

37. Not exactly true

It stresses out Twitler and causes conflict within his family. He's stressed me out and caused conflict in my family so l'll take this as a little win. Will it damage his presidency? Of course not.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

39. If David Dennison or one of his associates physically threatened her that's a crime.

Also, the payment for her silence so close to the election can be construed as a donation. That's also a violation of campaign law.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

40. ...tonight changes nothing..."

"Look at a stone cutter hammering away at his rock, perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it. Yet at the hundred-and-first blow it will split in two, and I know it was not the last blow that did it, but all that had gone before."

-Jacob Riis

[democratisphere]

41. I don't think Stormy's lawyer would have hyped NOTHING.

Avenatti is a lot smarter than that. Disagree with your prediction.

[yonder]

43. perhaps akin to:

Evel Knievel, Snake River Canyon, steam-powered Rocket Cycle some 40+ years ago? Lots O'hype, not much substance. Who knows for sure? I bet I can hear about it after a nice hike in the desert, though.

[exboyfil]

47. Geraldo's vault

Rather's Killian memos.

[Kingofalldems]

51. Yeah, republicans are hoping for that.

[yonder]

52. yep, I forgot the Al Capones vault thing.

That may have been hyped even more, and the endless commercials after the endless "teasers" drove people nuts. My dislike for poofy-haired Geraldo was certainly decided that night.

[Kingofalldems]

54. Except it's not being hyped like that.

[mvd]

45. Give it a chance

Trump is in trouble from multiple sides. That is a good thing. We may not get a whole lot tonight, but we should get enough to keep our interest. As said, her lawyer is too good for it to be of no value.

[NCTraveler]

46. Since you put it that way...

It’s great news for Trump.

[Kablooie]

49. Always if expectations are too high the results will be disappointing.

And it's on a national network that has legal restrictions on content.

I expect it may be interesting but not overly scandalous based on expectations and what is already known about Trump.

[flibbitygiblets]

53. Prediction: Teaser of a hotel security camera showing them going into his room together

and lots of talk about the threats. I think her lawyer will play this up to drum up sympathy, especially in the wake of all the serial abusers who've got their stank all over tRump and the WH.

It won't be bombshell, but it will be enough to keep the story in the news.

[helmedon1974]

55. Someone doesn't seem to have a decent grasp

On the English language. If you think about it, she and her lawyer gain little from over hype. It's already recorded, so the network already knows what it contains. It's not like this is Geraldo opening a vault.

[HopeAgain]

59. Large viewership will be used as evidence

that the American public wants to know about the morals of their president. They will argue that the NDA thwarts the public's right to know. I really think this is one of the goals of appearing on tv before the court can rule on the NDA.

[Snackshack]

67. Agreed.

People are pinning a lot of expectations on this interview and they are going to be disappointed. The same thing is happening with Mueller. I remember people thinking Patrick Fitzgerald was going to bring justice to the bush admin and that turned out not to be the case... Never say never. Mueller could indict trump but I seriously doubt it. Unindicted co-conspirator maybe but still that is not going to fix the trump problem. It is going to take congress and for congress to do anything it is going to take Dems winning back control of congress in Nov.