General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAsk a Republican this today:
If Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about a consenual sexual relationship, do you now support the impeachment of Donald Trump?
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)it's not the same thing! Bill is a Clinton!
CatMor
(6,212 posts)when it happened with Lewinsky and trump did it before he was in the WH.
chuckstevens
(1,201 posts)What if Bill had paid Monica $130,000 to keep her mouth shut?
CatMor
(6,212 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)Once there Donnie be home free? I don't think so! The RW morality cops were not subdued in bringing up Gennifer Flowers repeatedly during the '92 primaries. Ms. Flowers being a consensual partner from years earlier who was never offered hush money as damage control.
CatMor
(6,212 posts)why pay that if it's not true. trump tweeting again today about fake news.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)Looks like Cohen will be getting disbarred, at the least.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)spanone
(135,816 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Already did and I could have predicted the response.
"Bill Clinton lied to a Grand Jury".
moose65
(3,166 posts)It's some variation of one of these:
It happened 12 years ago! Who cares??
Yeah, but Clinton did it IN the White House! This was WAY before Trump was elected!
The gist of it is, of course, that anything that Bill Clinton has ever done will always be dredged up and held against him and Hillary and ANY Democrat, really, but Trump (of course) gets a pass. This will never, ever convince any of them to drop their support of Trump.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)Republicans still bring up Ted Kennedy and Chappaquiddick, and point to Robert Byrd being in the KKK in the 1940s as proof he (and other Democrats) hate black people.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)Having a love child with his mistress in 1874.
ThirdEye
(204 posts)As opposed to the act itself. Correct me if I'm wrong. Definitely not defending what they did, but nuance matters especially if we want to claim we reason with the relevant facts. Otherwise, they can dismiss our arguments even if they bring nothing to the conversation themselves.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)In front of congress and on his security clearance forms. He should lose his license too.
Wounded Bear
(58,634 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Not for the relationship itself.
Kingofalldems
(38,444 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Just lying about it (to the press, for instance) would not have been impeachable.
Different Drummer
(7,612 posts)No, IOKIYAR.*
*It's Okay If You're a Republican