Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2018, 12:47 AM Mar 2018

Moscow Project and the GOP

Republican representative Mike Conaway gave the game away when he made a bit of an admission on Meet the Press:

“Our committee was not charged with answering the collusion idea,” Conaway said on NBC's “Meet The Press.”

"So we really weren’t focused on that direction."
A spokesperson for Conaway later hustled out to say that the Texas congressman meant obstruction, not collusion. But the evidence that the House Intelligence Committee diligently avoided looking into both in their supposed investigation of Trump–Russia continues to grow.

According to the Center for American Progress’s Moscow Project, the House committee charged with investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 election obtained either no or incomplete information about 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and Russians, or groups and individuals with strong Russia ties like Wikileaks.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/3/22/1751121/--Moscow-Project-shows-the-scope-of-Trump-s-cover-up-and-the-evasion-of-Republicans-in-the-House?detail=emaildkre

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Moscow Project and the GO...