Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

egbertowillies

(4,058 posts)
Thu May 3, 2018, 02:58 PM May 2018

The US, France and Great Britain Helped Make a Mess of the Middle East

David Lee McMullen is a member of the history faculty at the University of North Carolina Charlotte, where he teaches British and American History. He is the author of Strike! The Radical Insurrections of Ellen Dawson.

Looking at the recent three-nation attack on Syria’s chemical weapons, it is easy to remember that a hundred years ago the same three nations were involved in altering the political forces within the region, two by aggressive action and one by lack of action.

https://theliberalnetwork.com/2018/04/29/usa-france-great-britain-middle-east/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US, France and Great Britain Helped Make a Mess of the Middle East (Original Post) egbertowillies May 2018 OP
Yes, but... brooklynite May 2018 #1
Yes, 90% of the seeds of all the troubles in the Middle East Blue_Tires May 2018 #2
Don't forget World War 1.... dubyadiprecession May 2018 #3
At least the British are consistent - they've been bombing Iraqis for 98 years now. FarCenter May 2018 #4
Churchill was an imperialist and racist malaise May 2018 #6
He didn't want Britain to surrender and be occupied by the germans dubyadiprecession May 2018 #7
Yep malaise May 2018 #9
+1,000 malaise May 2018 #5
There's more profit to be made in the middle east bombing the shit out of it... Initech May 2018 #8

brooklynite

(94,490 posts)
1. Yes, but...
Thu May 3, 2018, 03:02 PM
May 2018

before western involvement, this was not a pastoral region where everyone got along with everyone else.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
2. Yes, 90% of the seeds of all the troubles in the Middle East
Thu May 3, 2018, 03:02 PM
May 2018

were planted during and immediately after the First World War...

I thought this was common knowledge??

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
4. At least the British are consistent - they've been bombing Iraqis for 98 years now.
Thu May 3, 2018, 03:09 PM
May 2018
The British War Secretary, Winston Churchill, authorized immediate reinforcements from Iran that included two squadrons of the Royal Air Force. The use of aircraft shifted the advantage to the British and played a huge role in ending the revolt.[15] There were also tribes that worked against the revolt since they were recognized by the British authorities and profited from this acknowledgement. Eventually the rebels began to run low on supplies and funding and could not support the revolt for much longer while British forces were becoming more effective. The revolt ended in October 1920 when the rebels surrendered Najaf and Karbala to the British authorities.[6]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_revolt_against_the_British

dubyadiprecession

(5,705 posts)
7. He didn't want Britain to surrender and be occupied by the germans
Thu May 3, 2018, 03:34 PM
May 2018

But it was okay for Britain to occupy places like Northern Ireland and India.
I hope Churchill is burning in hell with Hitler.

Initech

(100,060 posts)
8. There's more profit to be made in the middle east bombing the shit out of it...
Thu May 3, 2018, 03:41 PM
May 2018

Than there is in keeping it peaceful. We'll probably never see peace in the middle east as long as there is money to be made.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The US, France and Great ...