Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Mon May 14, 2018, 09:28 AM May 2018

Looking for a Trump Administration job? No shirt, no shoes, no references, NO PROBLEM!

Trump administration so desperate for help that it’s stopped asking hires for professional references: report



https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/trump-administration-desperate-help-stopped-asking-hires-professional-references-report/

The New Yorker reports that the Trump administration has stopped asking prospective hires for professional references when they apply for jobs, which the publication describes as part of a broader effort at lowering barriers to bringing new people aboard.

The report notes that the Obama administration “had used a questionnaire with sixty-three queries about employment, finances, writings, and social-media posts” before it hired people, and it says that the Trump administration has slashed the number of questions by more than half, while removing questions about “loans, personal income, and real-estate holdings.”

The administration has also followed the president’s own lead and is not asking prospective hires to show their tax returns, the report claims.

One source also tells the New Yorker that the administration has sought creative ways for hires to get around potential concerns about conflicts of interest so that they could work for the administration without relinquishing their current investments.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looking for a Trump Administration job? No shirt, no shoes, no references, NO PROBLEM! (Original Post) Miles Archer May 2018 OP
umm...no vetting...what could go wrong? HipChick May 2018 #1
Especially when you consider the turnover rate for those they HAVE vetted. greatauntoftriplets May 2018 #2

greatauntoftriplets

(175,729 posts)
2. Especially when you consider the turnover rate for those they HAVE vetted.
Mon May 14, 2018, 10:44 AM
May 2018

Maybe the only vetting was for loyalty to Spanky.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looking for a Trump Admin...