Pierce: Trump Just Named a Consumer Watchdog Who Will Play Dead

[babylonsister]

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a20731505/ftc-consumer-protection-advocate-payday-lenders-facebook-equifax/

Trump Just Named a Consumer Watchdog Who Will Play Dead
The best people, volume infinity.
By Charles P. Pierce
May 17, 2018


The rigid vetting standards that have been characteristic of this administration* seem still to be working at peak efficiency. The job of consumer protection advocate at the Federal Trade Commission was open and, on Wednesday, it was filled, as The New York Times reports. As an active consumer, I was happy to hear this until, you know….

The director, Andrew M. Smith, has recently represented Facebook, Uber and Equifax — all companies with matters before the commission — and plans to recuse himself from dozens of cases now that he has been confirmed for the post. And in 2012, Mr. Smith was also part of the legal team that defended AMG Services, the payday lender founded by the convicted racketeer Scott Tucker, whose predatory practices against impoverished borrowers eventually led to a $1.3 billion court-ordered settlement, the biggest in the commission’s history.

Yes, yes, everybody deserves legal representation, but the mouthpiece for misery merchants doesn’t deserve a job keeping the rest of us safe from his former clients.

On October 2016, a federal judge in Nevada hit AMG with a $1.3 billion settlement and held Mr. Tucker personally liable for setting up the complicated enterprise. In January, he was sentenced to over 16 years in federal prison “for operating a nationwide internet payday lending enterprise that systematically evaded state laws for more than 15 years in order to charge illegal interest rates as high as 1,000 percent on loans,” according to a news release from the Justice Department. (Mr. Tucker had used his profits from the payday lending scheme to fund a side career as a race-car driver.) Mr. Muir, his lawyer, received a seven-year sentence. Mr. Smith declined to say whether he had spoken with Mr. Tucker, saying he was unsure whether answering would violate confidentiality agreements with his former clients. “And does it matter?” he said.

Putting the best possible spin on this nomination is to argue that Smith has promised to recuse himself from any investigations into his former clients. However, that isn’t exactly optimizing the power of his office. What good is a watchdog that has to play dead?

Mr. Smith also declined to name other companies on his recusal list. He said many were banks, and were thus typically not regulated by the Federal Trade Commission. He added that he would still stay busy at the agency because there were many companies that were not on his list. “It’s a big world and the F.T.C. has very broad jurisdiction,” he said.

As we often say around this shebeen, Nothing But The Best People is never not going to be funny.

[Eliot Rosewater]

1. If your vote for trump last November was because you do NOT want protection

as a consumer and you do NOT want clean air and you do NOT want clean water and you do NOT want a working and safe infrastructure or healthcare, security and freedom, then your vote was effective.

I hear that in the face of this tremendous destruction of our country, HALF approximately will STILL vote for Republicans. You see I find that to be inexplicable and why we just cant survive ultimately.

[smirkymonkey]

2. I find this unbelievable. How can people be so blind and stupid?

I will never get my mind around such self-destructive behavior.

[Eliot Rosewater]

3. One just walked past me just now, every thing rump does harms her entire existence

but she is absolutely IN LOVE with rump and what he is doing.

I wonder what the women who voted for rump will say when he starts jailing or executing women for having abortions. I mean he did say he very much wants to punish them and was not sure how, exactly.