Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKARMA! men who posted mugshots online & charged to have them removed - Arrested
Karma can be painful, as the alleged owners of a controversial website which publishes police mugshots and charges people to have them removed, have discovered.
On Wednesday, Thomas Keesee and Sahar Sarid, two of the alleged owners of Mugshots.com, were arrested in Florida, following an investigation led by the Northern California Computer Crimes Task Force. Californias attorney general, Xavier Becerra, has brought criminal charges against both men as well as the other two co-owners, Kishore Vidya Bhavnanie and David Usdan.
The four defendants are accused of extracting more than $2m in mugshot-removal fees from over 5,000 people in a three-year period. Of those people, 175 have billing addresses in California, where the alleged Mugshot.com owners will face trial for extortion, money laundering and identity theft.
This pay-for-removal scheme attempts to profit off of someone elses humiliation, Becerra said in a press release. Those who cant afford to pay into this scheme to have their information removed pay the price when they look for a job, housing or try to build relationships with others. This is exploitation, plain and simple.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/18/mugshot-photos-arrested-extortion-just-busted
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1179 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KARMA! men who posted mugshots online & charged to have them removed - Arrested (Original Post)
Demovictory9
May 2018
OP
I can see these two threatening to put someone on the front page, etc. Tell their boss, etc. nt
USALiberal
May 2018
#6
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)1. Ha!
Who will they have to pay to have their mugshots removed?
catrose
(5,047 posts)2. I love it
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)3. Mugshots and arrest records are public records.
The identity theft and money laundering may be crimes, but I can't imagine extortion sticking:
The elements of California extortion are:
The defendant threatened to do one of the following to the alleged "victim":
a. Unlawfully injure or use force against him/her, a third party, or his/her property,
b. Accuse him/her or a relative or family member of a crime, OR
c. Expose a secret involving him/her or a family member, or connect any of them with some kind of crime, disgrace, or scandal;
When making the threat or using force, the defendant intended to force the "victim" into consenting to give him/her money or property or to do an official act;
As a result of the threat, the "victim" did consent to give the defendant money or property or do an official act; AND
The "victim" then actually did give the defendant money or property or perform the official act.
The defendant threatened to do one of the following to the alleged "victim":
a. Unlawfully injure or use force against him/her, a third party, or his/her property,
b. Accuse him/her or a relative or family member of a crime, OR
c. Expose a secret involving him/her or a family member, or connect any of them with some kind of crime, disgrace, or scandal;
When making the threat or using force, the defendant intended to force the "victim" into consenting to give him/her money or property or to do an official act;
As a result of the threat, the "victim" did consent to give the defendant money or property or do an official act; AND
The "victim" then actually did give the defendant money or property or perform the official act.
Arrests being public record, there is no 'secret', and in this case, the mugshot is already online.
Despicable? Absolutely. Extortion? Umm..
Demovictory9
(32,320 posts)5. illegal or not, a disgusting business model
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)6. I can see these two threatening to put someone on the front page, etc. Tell their boss, etc. nt
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)7. If I understand the charges, the state's claiming that just publishing the photos and then..
.. taking money to remove them is extortion. But the photos are public record, so there's no 'secret' involved.
If, as you posit, they were contacting the people and threatening them, that might be a better case.
brer cat
(24,401 posts)4. Thanks to Becerra!
K&R
removeslander
(8 posts)8. A small celebration, and a big battle yet to fight!
Unfortunately it is indeed legal, and these 2 individuals aren't even a drop in the bucket in terms of the corrupt industry as a whole :/
gopiscrap
(23,673 posts)9. welcome to DU