General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump says he is ready for a run; Paul says he has "no plans" but doesn't say no...
... what would be better for Obama, an independent run by Paul or by Trump?
maximusveritas
(2,915 posts)especially against someone like Romney.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)The fact that Paul is right on the one really big issue that Obama is wrong on (the war) will draw some progressives away from Obama; they'll ignore the fact that he's wrong on almost every other single issue and cast an anti-war vote.
Trump would be a blessing.
tibbiit
(1,601 posts)Trump is a joke. He wont even hurt repukes.
tib
maximusveritas
(2,915 posts)He takes about 5% from Obama, but takes about 15% from Romney. If it was just Trump, he'd have to get over 10% from Romney to equal that and I don't see that happening right now.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Or which star is my favorite!!!
Either of them running as an "independent" ensures a landslide for Obama.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)They're both nuts. If only this would really happen. I wouldn't mind seeing sister Sarah run too. LOL! More clowns for the car. But Trump wouldn't want to expose his taxes or lack of taxes when it gets down to it. And since it's not really a law, even Mittens might not show his either. They'll claim Big Government and it will fly with the Repukes.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)and if the media is reporting on the nutty Trump stuff then that would mean they would be spending less time reporting on all the smears against Obama that will be coming out from the PACs
spanone
(135,795 posts)i doubt they would be Obama supporters
RZM
(8,556 posts)Except actual supporters.
housewolf
(7,252 posts)and maybe a few more too
All that it would do is serve to split/splinter the Repub party, and that might be a really good thing.