Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pale Blue Dot

(16,831 posts)
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:33 PM Aug 2012

The Biblical definition of marriage is...

The Biblical Definition of marriage is…

- An arranged marriage—Genesis 24:1-4 (and many other passages)

- A levirate marriage (If a man died leaving no male heir, his brother was required to marry his widow and produce children)—Deuteronomy 25:5-10

- A polygamous marriage—1 Kings 11:3 (and many, many other passages)

- Not inter-racial—Deuteronomy 7:14; 1 Corinthians 7:39; 2 Corinthians 6:14

- Filled with sexual prohibitions—no intercourse during menstruation (The woman is unclean. Yet another degradation of women.) —The woman cannot withhold sex from her husband; she has to fulfill his desire for sex when he wants it. (And another example of the Bible’s misogyny)

- Not allowed to be dissolved, i.e. NO DIVORCE—Matthew 5:31-32; Mark 10:2-12; Luke 16:18

- Except when the man wanted to because his wife had become ‘displeasing’ to him—Deuteronomy 24:1-4

- Between a rapist and his victim—Deuteronomy 22:28-29

- An arranged marriage by a slave owner for his slaves—Genesis 24:4

- Can be between brother and sister—How else do you explain where Cain’s wife came from!

- Intended to produce children—Without children a woman was:
Shamed—a barren woman was looked upon as cursed by God
Unable to be saved—1 Timothy 2:15

And on, and on… ad nauseam!

http://atheists.org/biblical-view-marriage-responding-chick-fil

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Biblical definition of marriage is... (Original Post) Pale Blue Dot Aug 2012 OP
Which one of these does ChikFilA endorse, again? MNBrewer Aug 2012 #1
I imagine they would discount the old testament kwolf68 Aug 2012 #2
To follow Christ: leave your marriage and family REP Aug 2012 #3
Marriage: slightly better than hellfire REP Aug 2012 #4
responding to bigotry with mythology is almost as ineffective... mike_c Aug 2012 #5
Since those bigots say they base their bigotry on this mythology, is seems apt. uppityperson Aug 2012 #7
Well Said Sherman A1 Aug 2012 #8
The Bible is sooo early 90's...A.D. that is. n/t chowder66 Aug 2012 #6

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
2. I imagine they would discount the old testament
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:34 PM
Aug 2012

Although they surely don't discount the old testament on a bunch of other things.

REP

(21,691 posts)
3. To follow Christ: leave your marriage and family
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:37 PM
Aug 2012

Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

REP

(21,691 posts)
4. Marriage: slightly better than hellfire
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:41 PM
Aug 2012

1 Corinthians 7:8-9 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.

But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.


That Paul!

mike_c

(36,260 posts)
5. responding to bigotry with mythology is almost as ineffective...
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 06:44 PM
Aug 2012

...as responding with logic. The simple fact of the matter is that most bigots are bigots, not because they were persuaded by the inherent logic of their bigotry, but because they fear and distrust anyone who isn't just like them. And more and more I think the definition of "just like them" involves being able to mentally project themselves into someone else's shoes. It only takes a few perceived differences before that projection is blocked, and discomfort begins to set in.

Likewise, most bigots are deaf to persuasion by logic, no matter how rational, precisely because they cannot imagine themselves in that other person's shoes. I think it's a subtle thing, too-- all it takes is a minute possibility of projection, even the barest recognition that "yeah, that could be me," to combat overt bigotry.

So on some level, bigotry comes down to a lack of imagination, an inability to see one's self in someone else's place.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
8. Well Said
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 07:50 PM
Aug 2012

I completely agree, although I do like the option of tossing the aforementioned strings of marriage types in their face, just for my own satisfaction.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Biblical definition o...