WSJ confirms that Roger Stone requested damaging Clinton material From Wikileaks

[RandySF]

Link to tweet

?s=21

[triron]

1. Uh oh Roger.

[Freethinker65]

2. Finally Roger Stone's time in the barrel?

[Tommy_Carcetti]

3. This man will be indicted, and I will raise a tasty beverage the day he is indicted.

Besides Trump, he is the one person in this whole story whose downfall I will enjoy the most.

[malaise]

10. Mine is on ice

[RockRaven]

4. Wikileaks was deemed -- by US Intel heads including then CIA head now Sec State Pompeo

to be a hostile foreign agent. Stone is F-ed Bigly!

[Cha]

5. K&R

[spanone]

6. they are impressive liars

[Hortensis]

7. Soliciting stolen goods at very least.

[Kirk Lover]

8. Oh what is this here??? Lock this muthafucka up. Fucking 3 ring circus and we've been shutting

circuses down with jackasses in them coast to coast.

[triron]

9. kick for visibility

[rogue emissary]

11. He lied during his testimony.

Just say it plainly WSJ.

The emails could raise new questions about Mr. Stone’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in September, in which he said he “merely wanted confirmation” from an acquaintance that Mr. Assange had information about Mrs. Clinton, according to a portion of the transcript that was made public.

He lied and now I wonder if he was sworn in when he testified. 🤔

[MiniMe]

12. Wonder how much info Nunberg has on this

Wasn't he the guy that said he wouldn't say anything against Stone?

[Alethia Merritt]

13. LOCK HIM UP!!

[riversedge]

14. Roger best have a good lawyer. Now if connected to Trump--game over for trump

[triron]

15. Bad news (for Stone).