Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Wed May 30, 2018, 07:52 AM May 2018

David Corn: "Snowflakes for Trump" (the Barr train wreck gave the Mooch a sad. A very big sad).

David Corn

Verified account

@DavidCornDC

David Corn Retweeted Anthony Scaramucci
Snowflakes for Trump.




Anthony Scaramucci

Verified account

@Scaramucci
Anthony Scaramucci Retweeted Michael Knowles
When I was called a human pinkie ring and a goombah while in the @Whitehouse that was deemed acceptable comedy. Double standard. We better stop the macro punishments for micro aggressions soon. She made a joke in poor taste move on.


23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Corn: "Snowflakes for Trump" (the Barr train wreck gave the Mooch a sad. A very big sad). (Original Post) Miles Archer May 2018 OP
Mooch is craving attention again. The limelight is so fleeting . . . Vinca May 2018 #1
I was thinking the same thing oberliner May 2018 #5
While in the whitehouse... genxlib May 2018 #2
It Shouldn't ProfessorGAC May 2018 #3
The 24 hr news cycle isn't going to fill itself genxlib May 2018 #4
Or They Could Spend More Time on Each Topic ProfessorGAC May 2018 #6
Extra effort is cost genxlib May 2018 #7
Didn't Mean It That Way ProfessorGAC May 2018 #12
You are certainly correct genxlib May 2018 #13
Totally Fair ProfessorGAC May 2018 #20
however, instead of the disgraced Scaramucci NewJeffCT May 2018 #14
No doubt genxlib May 2018 #23
Why do we have to keep hearing from this failed sopranos extra? Mc Mike May 2018 #8
I see, Hitler was just macro punished for his mild racism. BSdetect May 2018 #9
Is it worth the effort cyclonefence May 2018 #10
no NewJeffCT May 2018 #15
Oh. cyclonefence May 2018 #17
see #25 and #26 NewJeffCT May 2018 #19
Got it cyclonefence May 2018 #22
Corrn is right...whiners gonna whine... Wounded Bear May 2018 #11
"while in the @Whitehouse"... jcgoldie May 2018 #16
Trump only hires the best! LOL BootinUp May 2018 #18
uh...Mooch, that's exactly what ABC did - ooky May 2018 #21

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
2. While in the whitehouse...
Wed May 30, 2018, 07:56 AM
May 2018

As I recall, you were fired before your start date. Does that count as "in the Whitehouse"

ProfessorGAC

(64,787 posts)
3. It Shouldn't
Wed May 30, 2018, 07:59 AM
May 2018

I don't get the media attention this guy receives. He was someone who was supposed to be a somebody in the WH for 10 minutes. Then got launched without ever actually doing anything.

Why does ANYBODY in the media give him a gram of attention?

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
4. The 24 hr news cycle isn't going to fill itself
Wed May 30, 2018, 08:05 AM
May 2018

Mildly controversial personalities like Mooch are a Godsend to fill time and generate attention.

I have always said that the 24 hr news cycle adheres to the law of Supply and Demand. When they supply 24 hours of space to fill, the value of the content drops precipitously.

ProfessorGAC

(64,787 posts)
6. Or They Could Spend More Time on Each Topic
Wed May 30, 2018, 08:30 AM
May 2018

Same result.

If they do as you suggest, that's just lazy. Wouldn't cost a dime more to do it. Just extra effort. Everything else is a sunk cost.

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
7. Extra effort is cost
Wed May 30, 2018, 09:21 AM
May 2018

To produce more content at an in-depth level would actually require some effort.

Journalism is expensive. Talking personalities are cheap.

I agree with you completely but that is just not what they do.

ProfessorGAC

(64,787 posts)
12. Didn't Mean It That Way
Wed May 30, 2018, 10:15 AM
May 2018

Sorry if i was confusing.

Not talking about further journalistic dig. Just keeping credible, and known, interviewees there for an extra 2 minutes, three times an hour, sucks up 2 hours of 24 minutes where they don't need to rely on a fake mobster like Scaramucci.

And, they could add one minute from the cutting room floor to the human interest stuff. The work was already done. They are consciously wasting that footage. That's another 24 minutes a day.

Now, it's 2.8 hours they don't have to fill, and the cost is zero.

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
13. You are certainly correct
Wed May 30, 2018, 10:21 AM
May 2018

But that would not satisfy the conflict quotient necessary to keep people interested. Sadly, too many people find straight news boring so they artificially spice it up. You know Bread and Circuses.

I try not to be cynical, but then...reality happens.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
14. however, instead of the disgraced Scaramucci
Wed May 30, 2018, 10:28 AM
May 2018

or pathological liar KellyAnne Conway or the hopelessly confused liar Rudy Giuliani on the air, why not have people like Adam Schiff, Ted Lieu, Richard Blumenthal, Chris Murphy, Elizabeth Warren, Corey Booker, Kamala Harris or any of several others?

genxlib

(5,517 posts)
23. No doubt
Wed May 30, 2018, 11:33 AM
May 2018

There are better choices

Of course we would like all the ones you would listed. But I daresay, I think the conservatives need to be represented.

But there are better ones that could be used without resorting to the usual cast of losers.

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)
10. Is it worth the effort
Wed May 30, 2018, 10:08 AM
May 2018

to try to explain to Scaramouchi that he was called names based on his behavior, not on his skin color? Now granted, "goombah" is Italiian-specific, but we were all educated by The Sopranos--isn't "goombah" a mafia guy's girl on the side? Maybe Scar felt his sexuality was being impugned. Anyway, waah waah waah.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Corn: "Snowflakes f...