General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsABC Knew Exactly What They Were Getting With Roseanne Barr
Here are some of the problems ABC seemingly ignored when handing the 65-year-old a series.
Barr previously called a black woman an ape.
In a since-deleted 2013 tweet, Barr called then-President Obamas national security adviser Susan Rice a man with big swinging ape balls.
Barr loves calling people Nazis.
In 2016, she called Hilary Clinton aide Huma Abedin a filthy nazi whore.
Barr dressed up as Adolf Hitler.
Barr peddles false conspiracy theories.
She has also tweeted about Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer fatally shot in Washington in 2016, claiming it was a political assassination. No evidence suggests that.
Apparently none of these lies set off any alarms for ABC.
Barr is terrified of Muslims.
That dog whistle could not have been louder, and still ABC did nothing.
Barr is transphobic.
Barr called for a college to be bombed.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/abc-knew-exactly-what-they-were-getting-with-roseanne_us_5b0db3bbe4b0802d69cf28d4
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)but, she posed for a picture with a tray human shaped figures (ginger bread men?) in front of an oven.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Beyond disgraceful! FIRED indeed!
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)that people of Jewish descent just loved that image.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Jewish people, Catholics, and any one else that didn't fit the Nazi criteria.
Glad that ABC dumped this sick in the head racist of a woman!
maveric
(16,445 posts)WTF?
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)If so, self-hatred dare one suggest?
Sick in the head a better suggestion!
Siwsan
(26,259 posts)That being said, I haven't watched her show, and have no idea if she's been tweeting out this toxic vileness since it started running, or if this was the first incident during production. I know she has prior to the show, but my guess is they had some very specific contract language to cover just such a situation happening during the scheduled run of the show.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Almost non-stop.
Siwsan
(26,259 posts)I knew she was a toxic person, from the few times she's popped up on a chat show I was watching. I just had no idea how toxic, or for how long she's been spewing.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Siwsan
(26,259 posts)It might take some 'Dutch Courage' for me to venture into her world. I worked with someone who was much like her and I still carry the emotional scars from being in her cross hairs.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)that ABC has attorneys skilled enough to make sure she pays the penalties for all the failed contracts of the remaining cast members and crew.
Siwsan
(26,259 posts)The rest of the cast is wonderful but I never understood the popularity of Roseanne, herself. She's not a particularly good actor and her voice - maybe it's just a "me" thing, but I have to force myself to listen to her.
I'm in the camp of hoping they revamp the show with out her. Let Dan be the family conservative. He seems far less odious a character and I really like John Goodman.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)They were totally fine with her when they were getting money for it.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)As a culture, it sure seems we are holding women to a far different standard.
How is she any different from Trump?