Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. Depends upon the Administration's response.
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 01:50 PM
Aug 2012

I've come to the conclusion that the White House won't do anything they calculate will negatively impact the results of the election. If they think that a war with Iran will be a net plus or even neutral, they might well go along with Netanyahu, even if it gets the U.S. into a much wider regional conflict and everything that goes along with it. That would, I gather, make some of the neocons quite happy.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. No, not a game changer.
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 01:50 PM
Aug 2012

Whatever credit might accrue to Mitt for his support of Israel would be countered by support for Obama when he responds.

Similarly, any blaming of Obama would be countered by reasoned arguments that Mitt was really out to bomb Iran.

I don't see it helping or hurting either.

Let's hope we don't ever find out.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
4. However, if we do get into war with Iran, Obama will eventually be regarded like Lyndon Johnson.
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 02:02 PM
Aug 2012

Generally, a pretty good President, if only he hadn't gotten us into the bloody quagmire.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
7. He already took that risk
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 03:07 PM
Aug 2012

when he doubled down on Afghanistan. We should have pulled out of both that place and Iraq on January 21, 2009. There is nothing positive we can accomplish by pouring more blood or treasure into those hellholes.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
11. The initial entry into Af-Pak generally viewed as legitimate 9/11-related. Iraq was a fraud,
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 04:55 PM
Aug 2012

US intervention is Syria is increasingly opposed as fraudulent entry into sectarian war, and an attack on Iran would simply spark outrage among many who voted for Obama.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. It would be the perfect situation for weasel words. "Peaceful resolution", "consulting our allies",
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 02:33 PM
Aug 2012

followed by, "No boots on the ground", "Iran brought this upon themselves", "..we will support Israel in trying to find a peaceful resolution", "The fleet is only protecting our vital national interests", and finally..

Support Our Troops.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
9. To many variables to know for sure. An attack seems unlikely.
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 04:15 PM
Aug 2012

If for no other reason than that Israel doesn't want to screw with out elections. It needs us to be happy with them no matter what so doing something crazy like that right before a Presidential election isn't likely.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would happen if Isra...