General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like Obama campaign thinks it might be Portman, too
Last edited Thu Aug 9, 2012, 02:53 PM - Edit history (1)
. . . I predicted Portman for Romney's VP choice about two weeks ago. Looks like the campaign is already highlighting Portman's record in an effort to define him in advance of whatever role he's going to play for Romney's presidential bid. Portman is in Colorado today shadowing the President with a 'bus tour' and whatever criticism he can get reporters to listen to.This article today outlines the campaign's response . . .
Obama campaign website seeking Portman stories
CINCINNATI -- President Barack Obama's Ohio campaign is urging people to tell stories about Rob Portman's "real record," with the Ohio Republican senator thought to be among the leading contenders to become Mitt Romney's running mate.
An appeal circulating this week states Ohioans should tell what they think Americans "need to know" about Portman. There is a website form for submitting Portman stories. A similar effort is under way by Obama's campaign in Florida. Sen. Marco Rubio also is often cited as a potential VP candidate, and the campaign there asks Floridians to share the "good, bad and ugly" on the senator.
Emails from Obama state director Greg Schultz and online messages to Ohioans about Portman say "If and when Romney does select him, we need to be able to tell the full story about his record." They offer some prompts, saying the former Bush administration official has been part of policies that hurt middle-class families and the U.S. economy.
"It's our responsibility to make sure he isn't elevated to a position where he can do it again, this time, as vice president," the Obama campaign states.
read more: http://www.chillicothegazette.com/viewart/20120809/NEWS01/208090302/Obama-campaign-website-seeking-Portman-stories?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage
from Greg Schultz, Ohio State Director at the Obama campaign blog: http://www.barackobama.com/news/entry/vice-president-rob-portman?source=read-more
Vice President Rob Portman
Very soon, we'll know if Mitt Romney is choosing Ohio's Senator Rob Portman as his running mate.
Which means there's work to be done.
While Portman's name has been floating around as a potential pick for Romney for a while now, most Americans don't know anything about him.
If and when Romney does select him, we need to be able to tell the full story about his record on Day One, which could very well be in the next few days.
Share what you think Americans need to know about Senator Portman, and why a Romney-Portman administration would be terrible for middle-class families.
Rob Portman has been an Ohio senator for two years now, but the most damning pieces of his record involve choices he made as a senior member of the Bush-Cheney administration and conservative congressman, the consequences of which still reverberate on a national scale. As one of the architects of the top-down Bush budget, Portman practically invented the policies that punished middle-class families while exploding the deficit, and crashing our economy.
We need to make sure he isn't elevated to a position where he can do it again, this time, as vice president.
Let's make sure we're ready.
related:
http://my.democrats.org/page/content/robportman
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)This really might be fun.
democrat_patriot
(2,774 posts)"One of W's economic advisors"
I can't see it being Portman - unless it's a guaranteed OH winner.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Paul Ryan is a land mine just waiting to explode and Pawlenty vetoed a bill that would have fixed the bridge that collapsed in MN before it collapsed.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)contest. The look on Bush's face is priceless. Like Portman is telling him there really were zero WMDs
Ninga
(8,275 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)ananda
(28,858 posts)nt
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Ummmmm hmmmmm.....?
Patiod
(11,816 posts)Oh, wait.......
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)you have to wonder just how much of someone's past experience influences what they do in later years. There's nothing horrible that sticks out, just a politician's history.
Who IS Rob Portman anyway?
On a personal note, he has very close ties to the Bush & Cheney Families http://instinctmagazine.com/blogs/blog/mary-cheney-donates-to-anti-gay-senate-hopeful?directory=100011; and the Romney/Cheney/Portman connection: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/24/1111098/-Dick-Cheney-Picked-Romney-s-Vice-President.
Portman came from HUGE lobbying roots: Patton Boggs, LLP then Squire Sanders and Dempsey. He also worked as a U.S. Trade Representative under #43.
Omitted from his Wiki entry:
For 2 years in the 80's, he worked at Patton Boggs.
http://www.pattonboggs.com/about/overview/
Patton Boggs began as an international law firm concentrating in global business and trade in 1962. While we have maintained our strong concentration in international and trade law, we have evolved beyond our roots to become a full-service firm with a national presence in every major area of legal representation. We were among the first law firms to recognize that all three branches of government could serve as forums in which to achieve client goals, enabling us to emerge as the nations leading public policy law firm, and we have developed our extensive business law capabilities into the firms largest practice area.
The Wikipedia entry which points to Patton Boggs, "about us" page contains a quote from what must be an old version. If that is the case, I can see why they've updated/modified the language.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patton_Boggs
It's a little amusing, to me, that the details of his previous employment are completely omitted. He was a lobbyist, no shame in that
From his Wikipedia entry they are proud about:
In 11/07 he with Squire, Sanders and Dempsey, the same thing, omitted. Why?:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rob-portman-to-join-squire-sanders--dempsey-llp-58806362.html
of the firm's transactional and international trade practice. Prior to OMB, he served as United States Trade Representative (USTR), and for 12 years as U.S. Congressman from Ohio's Second Congressional District. Before his election to Congress, Portman practiced international and business law as a partner in a Cincinnati law firm. Portman will be based in Squire Sanders' Cincinnati office, but will also maintain a presence in other offices, including the firm's Washington DC office.
This new position at Squire Sanders will allow Portman to live in his hometown of Cincinnati and to stay involved with his community while working on national and international issues. Squire Sanders has a thriving Cincinnati office and, with 30 offices in 14 countries, an exceptional national and international platform.
He seems to specialize in "free" trade on an international scale.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rob-portman-to-join-squire-sanders--dempsey-llp-58806362.html
My mama always told me it's the quiet ones you gotta watch.
elleng
(130,865 posts)and Hale Boggs was a DEMOCRAT, after all.
Biggest problem for me is his OHIO connection, and I do have concerns about that.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)It bothers the hell out of me that people like this, have so many ties to 1%ers, can be so easily elected into political positions with help from those same 1%ers. They have the influence to create the legislation that benefits even more 1%ers. Who represents us?
They work in the field, make connections, get elected to office, make more connections, get the ear of our politicians, get to write the laws in their favor, to benefit other wealthy people and corporations.
Outsourcing, low wage jobs, little or no benefits offered by employers, little to no hopes of even having a retirement plan.
It's their world, not ours and all they care about is accumulating more $$$$ and buying more influence and preying on those who are part of the "you people" caste.
That's what bugs the hell out of me.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)of the world. The Portman's, Bush's, Sheldon's, Koch Brothers have the 1% union of the elite on their side.
The influence contaminates our entire political system, Democrats and Republicans. Party doesn't matter to them, only the money that can be made matters.
At the same time, they destroy the unions of the 99% and use a variety of propaganda to influence voters against our unions. They created the wedges that keep us hating each other, dividing us and weakening people power.
It's so far gone I don't think there's an easy way out.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)And thank you for all the links. Marking to read later.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Bush Bush Bush and some more Bush
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)The way the Romney campaign has been turning out, I can't help thinking he won't bring enough to the game.
However, if not him, who? There's not a person on the short list who doesn't have a disproportionate amount of flaws vs the gains they'd bring.
elleng
(130,865 posts)Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Some even have him taking a point away from the ticket in Ohio.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 9, 2012, 04:26 PM - Edit history (1)
Portman scares me. I can see how people may be duped by his mild-mannered demeanor. He's a likeable person, which brings balance to a ticket where Robme is not likeable.
He's a trade "czar." Unless the Obama camp hits hard at the outsourcing issue, that may not hurt Portman.
His ties to Bush, his lobbying efforts...you'd think that people would care and take notice. However, I don't see how the Corporate Media holds him accountable. Team Obama will have to do the work.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)There's even a PPP poll which has his addition to the ticket as -1.
I've no idea if this is a reflection on how they feel about their senator, or if it's more a reflection of how they feel about Romney. If pressed to guess, I'd say it's the latter.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)is that he could very well depress the crazies.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)IMO, if they get desperate to change the story, like McCain did, they may go crazy--Paul Ryan.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)Romney's still screwed. The base will love him but his Budget plan would scare off moderates/indies/seniors. Romney's screwed any which way. He can't appeal to the moderates/indies without alienating the Tea Party and he can't appeal to the Tea Party without alienating the moderates/indies.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Two former Governors who are hated in their own state
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)Ohio, not so much. Southern Ohio, where Portman is from, is closer to Kentucky in mentality than it is to Cleveland, which is more the other big midwestern deindustrializing cities.
I hope that Cleveland emerges, btw, and I wish them all the luck I can. They have a nice lakefront to work with and a relatively mild climate for their latitude. And no, the Cuyahoga River doesn't erupt in flames every year.
That said, Portman did win a state-wide race, and he is reported to project a pleasant, low-key Midwestern personality. Notice I said project. He may seem more human than Rmoney, and may help to humanize the Mittster, who is a Michigan native, although an aberrant one. That may help not only in Ohio, but also in western and central Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and maybe Minnesota, although I doubt it for MN.
Pawlenty, based in Minnesota, comes across as more shrill to me, a native Michigoose, and he would not be able to humanize the Mittster in Ohio.
I hope that Mitt takes Pawlenty over Portman. I pray for Ryan, the nasty killer of SS and Medicare. Portman would like to kill Med., but he may seem nicer about it than Ryan.