Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 04:05 PM Jan 2012

A position the U.S. won't have to apologize for

In 1995, as first lady, Clinton addressed the United Nations 4th World Conference on Women, where she was the marquee attraction even without an official position.

"Tragically, women are most often the ones whose human rights are violated," she told the conference, in a speech that largely made her an international figure. "Even now, in the late 20th century, the rape of women continues to be used as an instrument of armed conflict.'

"If there is one message that echoes forth from this conference, let it be that human rights are women's rights and women's rights are human rights once and for all."

If women's rights, or at least women's safety, is increasingly an international concern, Hillary Clinton has had a lot to do with making it one. Her focus is not just a matter of obvious identity interest; two of the three previous secretaries of state were women, without the issue becoming this prominent.

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/david_sarasohn/index.ssf/2011/12/a_position_the_us_wont_have_to.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A position the U.S. won't have to apologize for (Original Post) tabatha Jan 2012 OP
This is another reason Politicalboi Jan 2012 #1
I just heard Robert Reich say the same thing. GoCubsGo Jan 2012 #2
or how would the hillary-hating obamanistas hands such a ticket lol nt msongs Jan 2012 #4
I didn't realize there were many of those. lol nt GoCubsGo Jan 2012 #9
I'd rather she run for President in 2016 sharp_stick Jan 2012 #5
YES! We NEED her in 2016. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #6
Is there any region on Earth where women are treated as inferior WITHOUT religion being behind it? randome Jan 2012 #3
China? maggiesfarmer Jan 2012 #7
Yes gratuitous Jan 2012 #8

GoCubsGo

(32,078 posts)
2. I just heard Robert Reich say the same thing.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 04:27 PM
Jan 2012

I'm listening to a re-run of the Thom Hartmann show, and Thom's saying the same thing. I think he would certainly attract a number of female "independent" voters if he does so. And, I keep hearing that Joe Biden has always wanted Hillary's current job. My big question is: How would all the Obama-hating PUMAs handled such a ticket?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Is there any region on Earth where women are treated as inferior WITHOUT religion being behind it?
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 04:30 PM
Jan 2012
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A position the U.S. won't...