Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:07 AM Aug 2012

Latest wingnut talking point: "Romney gave 10% to charity"

Here's what one of them just posted on a local board:

I wish he WOULD release his returns! Then you liberals would see that he gave 10% of his income to charity! How much did YOU give? Oh never mind, you only TAKE cause you're a liberal.


THIS is how that 'charity' uses its donations:









73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest wingnut talking point: "Romney gave 10% to charity" (Original Post) proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 OP
No he didn't. <<<------CALL THEM ON IT. He didn't give a fucking red cent to charity. As a LaydeeBug Aug 2012 #1
They really want to make that their talking point? catrose Aug 2012 #2
Well, they don't always think this stuff through. proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #9
Calling tithing charity is like calling your dues at the Elks Lodge charity. Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2012 #3
+1! bleever Aug 2012 #43
Those are nothing - check out the DC temple. Faygo Kid Aug 2012 #4
Mega church mania. proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #10
That suggests there are many Mormons engrained in the federal government. LiberalFighter Aug 2012 #14
There is something about Mormon temples that I find extremely creepy. GoCubsGo Aug 2012 #5
Yeah me too Ron Obvious Aug 2012 #19
there is something about Mormons that I find extremely creepy. onethatcares Aug 2012 #44
I suspect that also has a lot to do with it. GoCubsGo Aug 2012 #49
They strike me the same way. Wannabe castles without any true features lunatica Aug 2012 #59
It's the no windows - monolith - fortress look that creeps me out Salviati Aug 2012 #66
Those gold Moroni statues do make cool lightning rod tips slackmaster Aug 2012 #6
Reminds me of Stalinist Architecture ThoughtCriminal Aug 2012 #73
Nice...he took the "Lie Like a Rug" exit off the "Main Point" highway and drove the conversation to chalky Aug 2012 #7
Meh, I prefer "I'm from Missouri. You have to show me." I actually am from coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #8
You missed one...perhaps the newest! Frustratedlady Aug 2012 #11
To be fair fainaent Aug 2012 #12
To be fair, how much 'humanitarian aid' does this represent? proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #15
Thanks! I wasn't sure how to post photos. Frustratedlady Aug 2012 #16
I didn't say fainaent Aug 2012 #17
And how much more could they give, maybe even to people who aren't LDS members proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #21
A lot fainaent Aug 2012 #22
How much time and motivation to aid is there to converting people Johonny Aug 2012 #27
I really don't know. fainaent Aug 2012 #28
Also, consider how much less fainaent Aug 2012 #23
Oh so all of the people that staff the multi-million dollar mansions I drive by have other jobs??? progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #34
Building multi-million dollar fortress/ego temples, when people are starving? progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #33
They've also spent a shit-ton of that money trying to deny the rights of Gays (Prop. 8), and AzDar Aug 2012 #29
Thank you for reminding me. I'm having trouble with the PR onslaught here this morning... progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #35
And MILLIONS to defeat PropH8. Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #30
To pass not defeat FreeState Aug 2012 #52
Thanks for the correction. Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #65
Helping MEMBERS isn't true charity. It's beehive socialism. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #36
I would rather they skip the charity and pay taxes on their wealth. Autumn Aug 2012 #37
no, let's not be fair datasuspect Aug 2012 #56
Maybe it did, xmas74 Aug 2012 #61
bite my tongue, bite my tongue Progressive dog Aug 2012 #13
That 10% isn't charity, it's an income tax. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #18
Hmmm interesting. Wonder how the church knows what he made, but we don't? progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #32
No they don't - that is rediculas FreeState Aug 2012 #53
They send you a bill, they check pay stubs and they don't accept "no". n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #60
100% false FreeState Aug 2012 #67
They billed my mother in law for 10% of her unemployment check. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #69
I'm sorry but your being misinformed FreeState Aug 2012 #70
I saw the bill. Admittedly, this was circa 1985 or so. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #71
What disturbs me about the Mormon temples sgsmith Aug 2012 #20
That's to keep God in. proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #39
That is tithing and it is usually only to the church. How much did he give to charities other than jwirr Aug 2012 #24
And they know this how? Oh yeah, Mitt told them. This is pretty lame. Arkansas Granny Aug 2012 #25
It isn't nearly 10% if you factor in all the tax shelter frauds BlueStreak Aug 2012 #26
He gave it to the LDS, and they used to to build shopping malls, buy Pepsi distributors. Not charity progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #31
I bet his tax returns show that he did not tsuki Aug 2012 #38
I am confused. What charity does he give to? grantcart Aug 2012 #40
See response #3 above. bleever Aug 2012 #45
Their latest atte4mpt to equate taxes with "charity" alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #41
My answer: Ok, great. Then let's see his returns. gollygee Aug 2012 #42
You forgot all the shopping malls the Mormom Church owns... joeybee12 Aug 2012 #46
Can I stop paying my taxes and give it all to Greenpeace? McCamy Taylor Aug 2012 #47
Yes proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #50
Better keep this info handy: ohheckyeah Aug 2012 #48
Only the rich can afford to give 10% to charity. krispos42 Aug 2012 #51
He gave tithes to his church. Not charity lunatica Aug 2012 #54
Not only that - FreeState Aug 2012 #55
I don't see how tithing can be summarily labeled tax deductible. AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #57
He tithed. xmas74 Aug 2012 #58
tell him to release his tax returns and prove it...otherwise i'll believe what i wish spanone Aug 2012 #62
That's exactly what I told him. proud2BlibKansan Aug 2012 #64
So how much did he give that was non-Kolob related? dawg Aug 2012 #63
I've heard that the old-time Mafia was charitable, too. So? n/t gkhouston Aug 2012 #68
I have never understood the tax deductions for contributions to religious organizations..... Swede Atlanta Aug 2012 #72
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
1. No he didn't. <<<------CALL THEM ON IT. He didn't give a fucking red cent to charity. As a
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:15 AM
Aug 2012

welfare KING, *HE* only *takes* while he gets our hard earned tax dollars to ship the jobs of my bretheren overseas.

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
4. Those are nothing - check out the DC temple.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:23 AM
Aug 2012

Our future, if Romney gets in. The size and scale of this cannot be comprehended from this photo.

GoCubsGo

(32,079 posts)
5. There is something about Mormon temples that I find extremely creepy.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:23 AM
Aug 2012

Can't quite pin it down, although that golden idol on the spire may have a lot to do with it.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
19. Yeah me too
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:34 AM
Aug 2012

Last edited Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)

Some of them (like one near San Diego) look like poorly-done CGI castles from a b-rated Fantasy/sci-fi movie. There's something so bombastically juvenile about them.

onethatcares

(16,166 posts)
44. there is something about Mormons that I find extremely creepy.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:20 PM
Aug 2012

and to begin, it would be the tea totalling, false faced fuck yous they are capable of delivering with a smile.

Maybe it's just me, but my contacts with them always came to that.

GoCubsGo

(32,079 posts)
49. I suspect that also has a lot to do with it.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:56 PM
Aug 2012

I have had similar experiences, with a couple of exceptions. And, I'm sure that's always in the back of my mind.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
59. They strike me the same way. Wannabe castles without any true features
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:17 PM
Aug 2012

Like nothing will grow on them or mark them. No vines, no rain trails, no weathering of any kind. They look like amateurish CGI creations.

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
66. It's the no windows - monolith - fortress look that creeps me out
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:40 PM
Aug 2012

A saying I just made up with a lot of truthiness to it:

"Nothing good ever came out of a building with no windows"

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
6. Those gold Moroni statues do make cool lightning rod tips
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:25 AM
Aug 2012

ETA I drive on the freeway next to this one every work day.



chalky

(3,297 posts)
7. Nice...he took the "Lie Like a Rug" exit off the "Main Point" highway and drove the conversation to
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:26 AM
Aug 2012

his usual hangout, "The Demonize Liberals" Bar and Grill.

Try coming back with, "I wish he WOULD release his returns! Then you sphincters would see that he gave 10% of his income to baby-eating Nazi Ninjas!"

See? We can play the "I know what's in his tax returns" game, too.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
8. Meh, I prefer "I'm from Missouri. You have to show me." I actually am from
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:35 AM
Aug 2012

Missouri, too, so it adds a bit of 'zing'

 

fainaent

(51 posts)
12. To be fair
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:51 AM
Aug 2012

The LDS church has provided over a billion dollars in humanitarian aid in the last 25-odd years, not to mention all the local aid that wards provide to their members(assistance with food or paying bills).

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
16. Thanks! I wasn't sure how to post photos.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:19 AM
Aug 2012

They've also bought a LOT of property in Nauvoo and turned the town into a tourist stop. Some of the original buildings were still standing, so they renovated them. I can't imagine how much money has gone into Nauvoo from the LDS. It is interesting.

 

fainaent

(51 posts)
17. I didn't say
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:26 AM
Aug 2012

that temples are considered humanitarian aid, although in some areas it is from LDS in wealthier countries who pay for poorer countries to have their own temple. I don't see how helping other members of your faith in other parts of the world to have the opportunity to fully participate in your religion is a bad thing.

My point was that donations go to more than just temples. Shouldn't money that is sent to people in need be considered 'charity'? What about food, clothing, medicine?

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
21. And how much more could they give, maybe even to people who aren't LDS members
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:41 AM
Aug 2012

if they didn't build multi million dollar mega temples?

Why do they NEED these temples?

 

fainaent

(51 posts)
22. A lot
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:44 AM
Aug 2012

But that doesn't change the fact that they still give a lot anyway.

What's the point of minimizing the good a group does, by saying 'they could do more'?

Everybody could do more... Have you ever bought anything that wasn't necessary to your survival? A TV maybe? You could have donated that money to a family that needs food...

They need the temples because they are central to their faith.

Johonny

(20,833 posts)
27. How much time and motivation to aid is there to converting people
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:55 AM
Aug 2012

That is always the double edged sword of humanitarian aid. Most religious aid comes with the side negative of evangelizing. It's nice in all that they "help" people, but it isn't very nice that they consider these people prospects to be converted into their faith. The main goal our the centuries of religious charity and aid has typically been to convert people into the religion. Something they is not a huge for the greater good feel for most people. You may like it if you want, but to some people even Mother Teresa had her kind of an * side to her charity.

 

fainaent

(51 posts)
28. I really don't know.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:00 PM
Aug 2012

I've worked alongside LDS members on certain projects, in the US and in Brasil. Mostly, I see nothing more than a simple offer to share a message.

Regardless, the fact is that the LDS have donated over a billion in money and supplies to people who need it, outside of their own faith. That definitely qualifies as charity in my book.

 

fainaent

(51 posts)
23. Also, consider how much less
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:45 AM
Aug 2012

they would be able to give, if they had a paid clergy. Instead, everybody works in their church as a volunteer.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
34. Oh so all of the people that staff the multi-million dollar mansions I drive by have other jobs???
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:28 PM
Aug 2012

Sorry. That's not true. It feels like you're here to push Mitt Romney and defend the BS that his 10% is charity.

It is not. The LDS has extremely expensive and extensive media production facilities, they own shopping malls, and many businesses. You mean to tell me that the people who produce all of their "I am a Mormon" ads and marketing pieces do it for FREE?? Really? That' ridiculous.

The truth is it's another religion that exists to enrich certain people, and their only outreach is to recruit more paying members. It's a pyramid scheme.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
33. Building multi-million dollar fortress/ego temples, when people are starving?
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:24 PM
Aug 2012

That's egregious. They also use their money for shopping malls (to award contracts and jobs to LDS members.) It's like a big pyramid scheme. Their "non profit" businesses are really businesses that only benefit their faithful and connected.

I DO think it's a bad thing to spend hundreds of millions on buildings, especially in countries where people lack the basic necessities. It's not charity in the least... not even close.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
29. They've also spent a shit-ton of that money trying to deny the rights of Gays (Prop. 8), and
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

let's not forget that Mormon 'charity' is only extended to fellow Mormons, not the general public.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
35. Thank you for reminding me. I'm having trouble with the PR onslaught here this morning...
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:29 PM
Aug 2012

They DID spend millions and millions in California to deny rights to gays. That is not charity.. and Romney helped to finance that.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
65. Thanks for the correction.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:29 PM
Aug 2012

We don't have Propositions here and I always get confused as to which way they are worded (positive/negative).

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
36. Helping MEMBERS isn't true charity. It's beehive socialism.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:48 PM
Aug 2012

Helping NONMEMBERS is the true test of charity.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
37. I would rather they skip the charity and pay taxes on their wealth.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:55 PM
Aug 2012

Then they can give to the poor and needy and use it as a TAX DEDUCTION. Just like the rest of us real people do.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
61. Maybe it did,
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:22 PM
Aug 2012

same as UMCOR provides aid all over the world. The difference is this is a tithe.

I use UMCOR as my example because I'm a Methodist. When I tithe it goes to UMC and then is divided to its many places, including UMCOR. It's not giving to charity because not all of it goes to charity.

As a Methodist I could chose to instead give directly to UMCOR and that would be a charitable donation. I'm sure there is something similar in LDS, if that's the argument that is being made.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
13. bite my tongue, bite my tongue
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 10:54 AM
Aug 2012

Didn't work to stop my typing. At the risk of upsetting some, I'd like to know why churches are considered charities.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
32. Hmmm interesting. Wonder how the church knows what he made, but we don't?
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:21 PM
Aug 2012

Or.. if he defrauded them as well??? Could that also be the reason he's hiding them?

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
53. No they don't - that is rediculas
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:10 PM
Aug 2012

The church asks ou if you paid 10%, yes or no. They do not ask for proof of income nor do they track your income.

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
67. 100% false
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:40 PM
Aug 2012

I was raised Mormon and served a mission - they send you a reciept for what you paid that year and that is it. They do to ask for proof of anything at all.

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
70. I'm sorry but your being misinformed
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:52 PM
Aug 2012

They do not send out bills, she's either telling you a story or your uninformed. There are several members here who can back me up on this as well (I'm not a member any longer).

http://tech.lds.org/wiki/Tithing_settlement

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
24. That is tithing and it is usually only to the church. How much did he give to charities other than
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:50 AM
Aug 2012

the church? I do not call giving to ones own church charity and I am a Christian.

Arkansas Granny

(31,515 posts)
25. And they know this how? Oh yeah, Mitt told them. This is pretty lame.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:50 AM
Aug 2012

First of all, tithing to one's church is not charity. Second of all, unless he releases his tax returns, we only have his word regarding his tithes or charitable donations.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
31. He gave it to the LDS, and they used to to build shopping malls, buy Pepsi distributors. Not charity
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:20 PM
Aug 2012

and other FOR PROFIT enterprises. I have yet to see any concrete proof that the LDS does anything but recruit, and use their money to make their own members richer.

tsuki

(11,994 posts)
38. I bet his tax returns show that he did not
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:56 PM
Aug 2012

give 10% to the Mormon Church. He cheated those guys also. My story and I am sticking to it.

bleever

(20,616 posts)
45. See response #3 above.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:21 PM
Aug 2012

And, given your special knowledge, if you should like to write a post about how the LDS church spends its money, I know it would be appreciated.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
41. Their latest atte4mpt to equate taxes with "charity"
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:20 PM
Aug 2012

Taxes aren't charity. they're the cost you pay to live in an organized society. Any attempt to equate the two forms of transaction are ideological hokum. Taxes are your legitimate payment for services you receive, and your implicit understanding that the common good requires expenditure. They are not charitable contributions to any specific person or class of persons in need.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
42. My answer: Ok, great. Then let's see his returns.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:24 PM
Aug 2012

He obviously has nothing to hide if what you say is true, so let's see the returns.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
48. Better keep this info handy:
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:39 PM
Aug 2012

In 2009, the president’s taxable income was about $5.5 million. He listed $329,100 in charitable contributions on his tax return and also directed the Nobel Prize Committee to give his $1.4 million prize directly to 10 charities (which meant he could not take a tax deduction for donating the prize).

In 2010, for instance, the president’s taxable income was a little over $1.7 million, much of it from book sales. Line 19 of his itemized deductions shows that he gave $245,075 in gifts to charity.

President Obama reported earning about $790,000 last year (2011) and paid $162,000 in total taxes. He and the first lady donated $172,000 to charity, or about 22 percent of their adjusted gross income, according to their tax returns. The majority of the first family’s donations went to the Fisher House Foundation which provides scholarships to veterans’ children.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-gifts-to-charity-just-1-percent/2012/02/14/gIQAXuMDER_blog.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/obamas-2011-tax-returns-show-20-5-percent-rate/

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
51. Only the rich can afford to give 10% to charity.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:54 PM
Aug 2012

And if they can afford to give 10% to charity, that just proves they can pay 10% more in taxes.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
54. He gave tithes to his church. Not charity
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:11 PM
Aug 2012

Some people should just learn to stop spouting off their stupidity. Really. Is that too much to ask?

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
55. Not only that -
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:14 PM
Aug 2012

To go to the temple one has to be a full tithing member - so its more like dues for a club.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
57. I don't see how tithing can be summarily labeled tax deductible.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:17 PM
Aug 2012

It isn't necessarily a charitable deduction.

Case in point, the Mormoonies used that resource to stick their nose into Prop 8 here in California. That was political - not charitable - and should not be tax-deductible.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
58. He tithed.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:17 PM
Aug 2012

That's not charity.

I tithe and I also give to charity whenever able. The two are totally different.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
72. I have never understood the tax deductions for contributions to religious organizations.....
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 09:03 PM
Aug 2012

Today, very little of most religious organizations' work is charitable if we define that as doing something selfless that helps others or the world at large (such as animals, the environment, etc.).

These organizations use that money to fund their religious activities many of which are used to discriminate against others. The Mormon Church is possibly the worst since they have a tithing requirement. They are a commercial empire with vast land and business holdings. The photos in this post show where much of that money goes. Yes they do support their students so they can attend a Mormon university. They are good about making sure their own members are fed and taken care of but most of that local work is over and above the tithe that must go to the mother ship in Salt Lake City.

He hasn't given to charity. He has given to a corporate conglomerate that uses the money to wrap itself in grandeur and work to defeat the rights of others such as the church's role in Prop 8 in California. The Mormon Church is evil to its core. I lived in a western state where 50% of the town's residents were LDS. It was a nightmare beyond belief.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Latest wingnut talking po...