General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLatest wingnut talking point: "Romney gave 10% to charity"
Here's what one of them just posted on a local board:
THIS is how that 'charity' uses its donations:
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)welfare KING, *HE* only *takes* while he gets our hard earned tax dollars to ship the jobs of my bretheren overseas.
catrose
(5,065 posts)When the Obamas gave 22% of their income to charity?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)bleever
(20,616 posts)That's a Bill Maher-worthy line.
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Our future, if Romney gets in. The size and scale of this cannot be comprehended from this photo.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)Can't quite pin it down, although that golden idol on the spire may have a lot to do with it.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Some of them (like one near San Diego) look like poorly-done CGI castles from a b-rated Fantasy/sci-fi movie. There's something so bombastically juvenile about them.
onethatcares
(16,166 posts)and to begin, it would be the tea totalling, false faced fuck yous they are capable of delivering with a smile.
Maybe it's just me, but my contacts with them always came to that.
GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)I have had similar experiences, with a couple of exceptions. And, I'm sure that's always in the back of my mind.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Like nothing will grow on them or mark them. No vines, no rain trails, no weathering of any kind. They look like amateurish CGI creations.
Salviati
(6,008 posts)A saying I just made up with a lot of truthiness to it:
"Nothing good ever came out of a building with no windows"
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)ETA I drive on the freeway next to this one every work day.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)chalky
(3,297 posts)his usual hangout, "The Demonize Liberals" Bar and Grill.
Try coming back with, "I wish he WOULD release his returns! Then you sphincters would see that he gave 10% of his income to baby-eating Nazi Ninjas!"
See? We can play the "I know what's in his tax returns" game, too.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Missouri, too, so it adds a bit of 'zing'
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)fainaent
(51 posts)The LDS church has provided over a billion dollars in humanitarian aid in the last 25-odd years, not to mention all the local aid that wards provide to their members(assistance with food or paying bills).
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)They've also bought a LOT of property in Nauvoo and turned the town into a tourist stop. Some of the original buildings were still standing, so they renovated them. I can't imagine how much money has gone into Nauvoo from the LDS. It is interesting.
fainaent
(51 posts)that temples are considered humanitarian aid, although in some areas it is from LDS in wealthier countries who pay for poorer countries to have their own temple. I don't see how helping other members of your faith in other parts of the world to have the opportunity to fully participate in your religion is a bad thing.
My point was that donations go to more than just temples. Shouldn't money that is sent to people in need be considered 'charity'? What about food, clothing, medicine?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)if they didn't build multi million dollar mega temples?
Why do they NEED these temples?
fainaent
(51 posts)But that doesn't change the fact that they still give a lot anyway.
What's the point of minimizing the good a group does, by saying 'they could do more'?
Everybody could do more... Have you ever bought anything that wasn't necessary to your survival? A TV maybe? You could have donated that money to a family that needs food...
They need the temples because they are central to their faith.
Johonny
(20,833 posts)That is always the double edged sword of humanitarian aid. Most religious aid comes with the side negative of evangelizing. It's nice in all that they "help" people, but it isn't very nice that they consider these people prospects to be converted into their faith. The main goal our the centuries of religious charity and aid has typically been to convert people into the religion. Something they is not a huge for the greater good feel for most people. You may like it if you want, but to some people even Mother Teresa had her kind of an * side to her charity.
fainaent
(51 posts)I've worked alongside LDS members on certain projects, in the US and in Brasil. Mostly, I see nothing more than a simple offer to share a message.
Regardless, the fact is that the LDS have donated over a billion in money and supplies to people who need it, outside of their own faith. That definitely qualifies as charity in my book.
fainaent
(51 posts)they would be able to give, if they had a paid clergy. Instead, everybody works in their church as a volunteer.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Sorry. That's not true. It feels like you're here to push Mitt Romney and defend the BS that his 10% is charity.
It is not. The LDS has extremely expensive and extensive media production facilities, they own shopping malls, and many businesses. You mean to tell me that the people who produce all of their "I am a Mormon" ads and marketing pieces do it for FREE?? Really? That' ridiculous.
The truth is it's another religion that exists to enrich certain people, and their only outreach is to recruit more paying members. It's a pyramid scheme.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)That's egregious. They also use their money for shopping malls (to award contracts and jobs to LDS members.) It's like a big pyramid scheme. Their "non profit" businesses are really businesses that only benefit their faithful and connected.
I DO think it's a bad thing to spend hundreds of millions on buildings, especially in countries where people lack the basic necessities. It's not charity in the least... not even close.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)let's not forget that Mormon 'charity' is only extended to fellow Mormons, not the general public.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)They DID spend millions and millions in California to deny rights to gays. That is not charity.. and Romney helped to finance that.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)FreeState
(10,570 posts)It passed, which took away existing marriage rights.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)We don't have Propositions here and I always get confused as to which way they are worded (positive/negative).
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Helping NONMEMBERS is the true test of charity.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)Then they can give to the poor and needy and use it as a TAX DEDUCTION. Just like the rest of us real people do.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)life isn't fair.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)same as UMCOR provides aid all over the world. The difference is this is a tithe.
I use UMCOR as my example because I'm a Methodist. When I tithe it goes to UMC and then is divided to its many places, including UMCOR. It's not giving to charity because not all of it goes to charity.
As a Methodist I could chose to instead give directly to UMCOR and that would be a charitable donation. I'm sure there is something similar in LDS, if that's the argument that is being made.
Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)Didn't work to stop my typing. At the risk of upsetting some, I'd like to know why churches are considered charities.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The church tracks what you make and sends you a bill.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Or.. if he defrauded them as well??? Could that also be the reason he's hiding them?
FreeState
(10,570 posts)The church asks ou if you paid 10%, yes or no. They do not ask for proof of income nor do they track your income.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)FreeState
(10,570 posts)I was raised Mormon and served a mission - they send you a reciept for what you paid that year and that is it. They do to ask for proof of anything at all.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)FreeState
(10,570 posts)They do not send out bills, she's either telling you a story or your uninformed. There are several members here who can back me up on this as well (I'm not a member any longer).
http://tech.lds.org/wiki/Tithing_settlement
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)sgsmith
(398 posts)Notice how they all are fenced?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)the church? I do not call giving to ones own church charity and I am a Christian.
Arkansas Granny
(31,515 posts)First of all, tithing to one's church is not charity. Second of all, unless he releases his tax returns, we only have his word regarding his tithes or charitable donations.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)It is probably more like 2%
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)and other FOR PROFIT enterprises. I have yet to see any concrete proof that the LDS does anything but recruit, and use their money to make their own members richer.
tsuki
(11,994 posts)give 10% to the Mormon Church. He cheated those guys also. My story and I am sticking to it.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)bleever
(20,616 posts)And, given your special knowledge, if you should like to write a post about how the LDS church spends its money, I know it would be appreciated.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Taxes aren't charity. they're the cost you pay to live in an organized society. Any attempt to equate the two forms of transaction are ideological hokum. Taxes are your legitimate payment for services you receive, and your implicit understanding that the common good requires expenditure. They are not charitable contributions to any specific person or class of persons in need.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)He obviously has nothing to hide if what you say is true, so let's see the returns.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Tax the phuckers.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)In 2009, the presidents taxable income was about $5.5 million. He listed $329,100 in charitable contributions on his tax return and also directed the Nobel Prize Committee to give his $1.4 million prize directly to 10 charities (which meant he could not take a tax deduction for donating the prize).
In 2010, for instance, the presidents taxable income was a little over $1.7 million, much of it from book sales. Line 19 of his itemized deductions shows that he gave $245,075 in gifts to charity.
President Obama reported earning about $790,000 last year (2011) and paid $162,000 in total taxes. He and the first lady donated $172,000 to charity, or about 22 percent of their adjusted gross income, according to their tax returns. The majority of the first familys donations went to the Fisher House Foundation which provides scholarships to veterans children.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-gifts-to-charity-just-1-percent/2012/02/14/gIQAXuMDER_blog.html
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/obamas-2011-tax-returns-show-20-5-percent-rate/
krispos42
(49,445 posts)And if they can afford to give 10% to charity, that just proves they can pay 10% more in taxes.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Some people should just learn to stop spouting off their stupidity. Really. Is that too much to ask?
FreeState
(10,570 posts)To go to the temple one has to be a full tithing member - so its more like dues for a club.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It isn't necessarily a charitable deduction.
Case in point, the Mormoonies used that resource to stick their nose into Prop 8 here in California. That was political - not charitable - and should not be tax-deductible.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)That's not charity.
I tithe and I also give to charity whenever able. The two are totally different.
spanone
(135,823 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)(Apologies to all the good LDS Dems)
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)Today, very little of most religious organizations' work is charitable if we define that as doing something selfless that helps others or the world at large (such as animals, the environment, etc.).
These organizations use that money to fund their religious activities many of which are used to discriminate against others. The Mormon Church is possibly the worst since they have a tithing requirement. They are a commercial empire with vast land and business holdings. The photos in this post show where much of that money goes. Yes they do support their students so they can attend a Mormon university. They are good about making sure their own members are fed and taken care of but most of that local work is over and above the tithe that must go to the mother ship in Salt Lake City.
He hasn't given to charity. He has given to a corporate conglomerate that uses the money to wrap itself in grandeur and work to defeat the rights of others such as the church's role in Prop 8 in California. The Mormon Church is evil to its core. I lived in a western state where 50% of the town's residents were LDS. It was a nightmare beyond belief.