Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:15 PM Aug 2012

Breaking: Romney Staff Warned Him Not to Pick Ryan!!

Breaking: Romney Staff Warned Him Not to Pick Ryan!!

by joelgp

Oh snap--check out this quick-read from: http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/romney-picked-ryan-over-advisors-early-doubts

"Mitt Romney appears to have picked Paul Ryan as his running mate over the objections of top political advisors, offering a glimpse into the Republican nominee in the most important decision of his campaign.

Romney's aides have stressed publicly in the 24 hours since Romney electrified conservatives with his choice that the pick was the governor's alone. They have been less forthcoming on the flip side: That much of his staff opposed the choice for the same reason that many pundits considered it unlikely — that Ryan's appealingly wonky public image and a personality Romney finds copasetic will matter far less than two different budget plans whose details the campaign now effectively owns.

"Everybody was against (Ryan) to start with only Romney for," said one top Republican, who is skeptical of the choice and griped that Romney's top advisors have "been giving Mitt everything he wanted in this campaign."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/12/1119416/-Breaking-Romney-Staff-Warn-Him-Not-to-Pick-Ryan




Romney chose Ryan because (updated)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021108475


146 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Romney Staff Warned Him Not to Pick Ryan!! (Original Post) ProSense Aug 2012 OP
Oh snap malaise Aug 2012 #1
I feel an ProSense Aug 2012 #4
LOL malaise Aug 2012 #40
He did as he was told. Faygo Kid Aug 2012 #2
as he was told by Sheldon.. not his advisors. of course. n/t progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #73
Or the Kochs who've promised immense amounts of money to beat Obama. HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #90
Or Grover Norquist . . . emulatorloo Aug 2012 #136
Gillespie is the inside conduit to Mitt Coyotl Aug 2012 #100
its really not going to matter either way WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #3
problem here is Skittles Aug 2012 #8
We have learned our lesson after Cheney. Baitball Blogger Aug 2012 #16
All you have to say is "Cheney". It matters. russspeakeasy Aug 2012 #39
But Cheney famously picked himself. HubertHeaver Aug 2012 #58
No, Cheney ran Bush. Coyotl Aug 2012 #102
He had all the makings of a CEO from the 20th Century. Baitball Blogger Aug 2012 #141
Pit Bulls with lipstick also matter. Rozlee Aug 2012 #138
he might help with turnout in some places WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #22
Actually it can mean a lot davekriss Aug 2012 #34
that's pretty sad Skittles Aug 2012 #36
Well, the freepers hate Romney. tclambert Aug 2012 #117
I know ProSense Aug 2012 #9
2 words...sarah. palin. spanone Aug 2012 #15
I have heard the opposite. Lone_Star_Dem Aug 2012 #17
yeah, but unless you're talking millions of people saying that WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #23
You'd be ProSense Aug 2012 #25
illistrated by Mc Govern and Egelton n/t oldhippydude Aug 2012 #45
In fairness to McGovern, he hardly 'botched' his pick of Eagleton. While I do coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #74
agreed... that probably was the scenario.. oldhippydude Aug 2012 #82
There was no vetting. Pab Sungenis Aug 2012 #133
I must go back and review my history, I think. I remember Eagleton's coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #135
You probably weren't paying attention to the folks that went out and voted for Palin. Tx4obama Aug 2012 #31
But it was a wash, though. For all the votes she gained from the base, she lost from the middle... Drunken Irishman Aug 2012 #42
I think you're right. Sister Sarah spread the word in a way that only she could. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #49
You probably weren't paying attention to all those who DIDN'T vote for McCain Lex Aug 2012 #54
I know THAT. That wasn't my point. Tx4obama Aug 2012 #64
Yeah, that's why you're supposed to pick someone from a big battleground state, tclambert Aug 2012 #119
And California KamaAina Aug 2012 #140
But it can work in the reverse. Paka Aug 2012 #41
You are right. SheilaT Aug 2012 #137
It matters down ticket Cosmocat Aug 2012 #43
As a matter of fact Panasonic Aug 2012 #95
It matters here because Cha Aug 2012 #57
I agree for the most part, but back in '08 Duct Tape Aug 2012 #65
McCain, Palin bluemarkers Aug 2012 #69
Except for 2008 when McCain picked Palin.... Walk away Aug 2012 #80
Actually, I gave considerable thought to voting for John McCain until he picked Sister Sarah. LoisB Aug 2012 #81
Actually, my mother-in-law, a registered Repug Esse Quam Videri Aug 2012 #83
I recall the excitement around the Palin pick though treestar Aug 2012 #91
Four years ago, I heard some people say "I was going to vote for McCain, amandabeech Aug 2012 #97
I challenge that. mick063 Aug 2012 #104
Sarah Palin! People who might have voted for McCain would not vote for JDPriestly Aug 2012 #108
REALLY? REALLY? Th1onein Aug 2012 #124
no, i didn't forget about Palin WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #126
The woman is a national (and international) joke! She lost McCain the election, no doubt. Th1onein Aug 2012 #144
I think quite a few people said just that SalviaBlue Aug 2012 #132
just like the fool romney to make a 'bold' wrong, boneheaded choice spanone Aug 2012 #5
It's potentially very telling that we are already hearing about this. dawg Aug 2012 #6
This was my first thought, too. Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #11
There was some grumbling back in 2008, too. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #51
Heh. Yeah, that and Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #66
Usually, but mick063 Aug 2012 #105
excellent point NJCher Aug 2012 #142
I don't think Ryan was Romney's choice either liberal N proud Aug 2012 #7
That's the reality, he'd like credit for not picking him.. flamingdem Aug 2012 #10
I totally agree Andy823 Aug 2012 #55
Agree.. Romney didnt pick Ryan... lib2DaBone Aug 2012 #86
Exactly. It is not like th edecision was Romney's BlueStreak Aug 2012 #94
spot on, as my UK friends say Cobalt-60 Aug 2012 #99
men like romney are empty shells with an unnatural competitive streak datasuspect Aug 2012 #12
Another Palin. Lifelong Protester Aug 2012 #13
And right after he corrected the introduction he said, sad sally Aug 2012 #14
That was a weird moment, saying that while putting his arm around Ryan's shoulder. enough Aug 2012 #19
It was strange. And never a mention that his guy has no "real" business experience except sad sally Aug 2012 #24
With his arm around ryan, wasn't it? Cha Aug 2012 #61
He did it hiiiiiis waaaaay. nc4bo Aug 2012 #18
A train wreck sellitman Aug 2012 #20
Well, hopefully he can make it through the convention and out of the station before the train wrecks Brother Buzz Aug 2012 #76
Ryan already seems to be overshadowing him frazzled Aug 2012 #21
I just had deja vu from '08 RedStateLiberal Aug 2012 #29
Yeah, I know what you mean. The last time we saw this "rock star VP candidate," it was sarah palin. calimary Aug 2012 #84
Gotta correct you on that. The large crowds could NOT have known Ryan would be the pick. progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #78
Good call! Something I did not know at all. part man all 86 Aug 2012 #85
Untwist your panties! frazzled Aug 2012 #101
Where did they line the street in NC? unc70 Aug 2012 #110
The point is ... frazzled Aug 2012 #112
"you folks"?!! Really?! Stick to IL, let me talk about NC unc70 Aug 2012 #115
um... where did you hear they lined the streets? I mean I guess the 1700 or so stood outside before Tunkamerica Aug 2012 #116
Are there really that many filthy rich people in this country?? smirkymonkey Aug 2012 #93
Romney needs to change the terms of his Friday proposal DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2012 #26
Looks like this campaign has more than enough material for an HBO movie BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #27
Double the pleasure if you include '08. OMG. nc4bo Aug 2012 #33
Butch Patrick isn't available? lastlib Aug 2012 #52
He's a bit too old now BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #59
It's too late to dump this losing duo now, Republicans AnnieK401 Aug 2012 #28
Amazing What Phone Calls From Adelson And Koch DallasNE Aug 2012 #30
A story to show he is not controlled by everyone around him. woo me with science Aug 2012 #32
yup. He's a maverick. The tea-baggers are gonna love hearing about it this. n/t Ed Suspicious Aug 2012 #77
More proof Rmoney caved RedStateLiberal Aug 2012 #35
Wow. I have never seen staff throw the boss under the bus in the middle of the campaign. wilsonbooks Aug 2012 #37
I know..it's unheard of! For Cha Aug 2012 #63
I swear this guy does not want to be president. He just wants to reset the bar so low... chowder66 Aug 2012 #38
"... foreign policy advisor Dan Senor..." speedoo Aug 2012 #44
This is why dsteve01 Aug 2012 #46
Remember what Norquist said. jonthebru Aug 2012 #47
"working digits" baby. Everyone needs to post that quote early and often on Social Media. n/t progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #79
Even more reason for me to believe that someone making big donations to the Romney campaign insisted LynneSin Aug 2012 #48
When someone is spending millions to help you get elected subterranean Aug 2012 #60
Bingo. HooptieWagon Aug 2012 #72
I think Romney saw his campaign in trouble cleduc Aug 2012 #50
Romney is an empty suit The empressof all Aug 2012 #53
I can see a new ad from Obama: sakabatou Aug 2012 #56
This says that the Romney camp is living in an even BIGGER fantasty world rocktivity Aug 2012 #62
Yep. nt HooptieWagon Aug 2012 #75
McCain/Palin II bupkus Aug 2012 #67
OK, this is beginning to scare me. WinstonSmith4740 Aug 2012 #68
It seems like a hastily made pick Trekologer Aug 2012 #70
I didn't know about the signs. amandabeech Aug 2012 #98
Knew it! I pegged Romney as a self-centered CEO type, who only listens to yes-men. progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #71
totally agree.. suffers from wealthy corporate CEO syndrome.. BREMPRO Aug 2012 #139
Romney should just stay in hiding... Kalidurga Aug 2012 #87
how long til his campaign is a ghost town? SaveAmerica Aug 2012 #88
Forget about political advice, this was about his financiers' mandates. HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #89
We never can let Mittens forget that he now owns little Eddie Munster Jr.! SoapBox Aug 2012 #92
Sorry, but I don't believe Mitt picked Ryan. Cheney and the Koch brothers did this. freshwest Aug 2012 #96
I don't believe it. I suspect they planted this story in the hope that the public will believe still_one Aug 2012 #103
Which ProSense Aug 2012 #106
I agree. /nt still_one Aug 2012 #109
I'm sure it was his big doners pick! B Calm Aug 2012 #107
Romney was 'advised' to choose a Cheney like Bush did. Whisp Aug 2012 #111
Its a match made in heaven. Blanks Aug 2012 #113
I loathe Ryan's politics, but he is at least The Second Stone Aug 2012 #114
Ryan has FlaGranny Aug 2012 #120
Personally I don't think rMoney had much choice madokie Aug 2012 #118
Integrity? We're talking about Republicans here. nichomachus Aug 2012 #127
Romney's words before he announced Ryan to his staff and the public... GetRidOfThem Aug 2012 #121
Chuck Todd just said that it was down to Pawlenty and Ryan....he didn't mention Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2012 #122
Romney is no longer interested kitt6 Aug 2012 #123
I've Been Correcly Predicting POTUS Elections Iggy Aug 2012 #125
This will provide cover when they steal WI Doctor_J Aug 2012 #128
That's gotta make Pawlenty feel better lol n/t Sheepshank Aug 2012 #129
I don't know... reflection Aug 2012 #130
The Koch brothers have given heaps of money to Ryan in the past. Jennicut Aug 2012 #131
"This is a F'ing sacred public office." Ganja Ninja Aug 2012 #134
The GOP is using Mitt as a throw-away candidate... Brooklyn Dame Aug 2012 #143
2 rogues don't make a right ecstatic Aug 2012 #145
Too late now! magnifisense Aug 2012 #146

WooWooWoo

(454 posts)
3. its really not going to matter either way
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:19 PM
Aug 2012

people vote for president, not vice president. In my entire life I've never heard anyone say "I wasn't going to vote for _____, but then he picked ____ as his VP, so I changed my mind."

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
102. No, Cheney ran Bush.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:48 PM
Aug 2012

And then he had to famously move his own ars back to Wyoming to be able to be number 2, safe from prosecution for the war crimes "Bush" committed!

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
141. He had all the makings of a CEO from the 20th Century.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:25 PM
Aug 2012

Let's hope the next generation learns to tighten the loopholes.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
138. Pit Bulls with lipstick also matter.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:37 PM
Aug 2012

The Jewish vote in Florida plunged for McCain after he chose Palin. Ezra Klein said something about Jews not caring much for people who said they were going to be destroyed by God during Armageddon unless they converted to Christianity. Ryan, like Palin and Cheney, only preach to the choir. They're going to lose the Independents.

WooWooWoo

(454 posts)
22. he might help with turnout in some places
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:36 PM
Aug 2012

but he won't mean much in the long run. it'll still be Romney (not Ryan) debating Obama three times.

All Ryan does is keep the excited base still excited (at least until the polling starts dropping).

davekriss

(4,616 posts)
34. Actually it can mean a lot
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:55 PM
Aug 2012

Picking Ryan increases the odds that national focus stays off the unemployment rate and on the economy and, instead, becomes a debate over whether or not we as a nation value and want Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security to continue as we know it.

It provides rich pickings for the Obama campaign. They will continue to frame the dialogue; Romney will be forced to continue on the defensive.

Not a bad pick -- for we Democrats!

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
117. Well, the freepers hate Romney.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:29 AM
Aug 2012

They threatened to shut down their website if he were chosen. They flip-flopped on that one. No surprise. They like Ryan because he really, really wants to wreck the government.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
17. I have heard the opposite.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:28 PM
Aug 2012

I was going to vote for McCain, but I can't after his choice in VP. I heard that sentiment from several people.

Historically, botching your first real decision as a potential leader of the United States, is not taken well by voters.

As to the VP choice not mattering in a positive way, it can make the difference between someone going from not being enthused to vote, to enthused. And vise versa, of course.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
74. In fairness to McGovern, he hardly 'botched' his pick of Eagleton. While I do
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Aug 2012

not have the definitive records in front of me right now, I'm fairly certain the onus lies with Eagleton for failing to disclose his electroshock therapy to McGovern's staff when it was vetting him.

Here's how I'm pretty sure the discussion went down:

McGovern Aide: "Is there anything in your past that would disqualify you from assuming the office of President, should the sitting President become incapacitated?"
Eagleton: "No."

If the buck always stops at the top, then yes McGovern 'botched' it. Elemental fairness demands however that Eagleton bear a share of the blame, don't you think?

oldhippydude

(2,514 posts)
82. agreed... that probably was the scenario..
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:15 PM
Aug 2012

my comment was in reference to picking the a dud, and the influence on the campaign... George never quite got his campaign on track after his initial mistake, and yes Eagleton should have been more forthcoming..

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
133. There was no vetting.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:29 PM
Aug 2012

McGovern won the nomination in the middle of the night, and called Eagleton asking him to be the running mate shortly afterward. That was the problem.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
135. I must go back and review my history, I think. I remember Eagleton's
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:45 PM
Aug 2012

nomination being highly contested but I thought I also remembered a standard vetting process where Eagleton failed to disclose his psychiatric treatments.

Wikipedia is notable as much for what it does not say as for what it actually does say:

"McGovern then asked Senator Gaylord Nelson to be his running mate. Nelson declined but suggested Tom Eagleton, whom McGovern ultimately chose, with only a minimal background check. Eagleton made no mention of his earlier hospitalizations, and in fact decided with his wife to keep them secret from McGovern while he was flying to his first meeting with the Presidential nominee."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Eagleton#Selection_as_vice_presidential_candidate

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
31. You probably weren't paying attention to the folks that went out and voted for Palin.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:52 PM
Aug 2012

Tons of the Palin fans posted in comments all over the net back in the last election that they hadn't planned on voting at all until McCain picked Palin.


 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
42. But it was a wash, though. For all the votes she gained from the base, she lost from the middle...
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:00 PM
Aug 2012

I suspect the same thing will happen with Ryan. He'll energize the base and maybe help with votes there, but in the end, he'll cost Romney votes among voters who consider themselves independent.

So, yes, there were a lot of voters who went out and voted Palin. There were also a lot of voters who decided to vote Obama because of Palin. Had McCain picked Pawlenty instead, those voters stay home and the ones who voted for Obama probably vote McCain, but the difference is minimal.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
49. I think you're right. Sister Sarah spread the word in a way that only she could.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:14 PM
Aug 2012

And a lot of Republicons fell for it.

Even though she blew her chance in the spotlight, she is still hanging around waiting for another reality show.


Lex

(34,108 posts)
54. You probably weren't paying attention to all those who DIDN'T vote for McCain
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:18 PM
Aug 2012

BECAUSE of Sarah Palin being picked by McCain. Also another factoid: they lost.





Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
64. I know THAT. That wasn't my point.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:42 PM
Aug 2012

My point was that there are folks that will go out and vote for the person listed as VP on a ticket.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
119. Yeah, that's why you're supposed to pick someone from a big battleground state,
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:44 AM
Aug 2012

hoping the VP's "favored son" effect will swing enough votes in his home state to win you those precious electoral votes. That's one of the realpolitik reasons selecting Palin made no sense. McCain already owned Alaska's 3 electoral votes. McCain should have gone with Tom Ridge to give him a chance in Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes).

Wisconsin currently falls in the undecided column, so maybe Romney hopes Ryan will bag him 10 electoral votes. The "favored son" effect doesn't always work, though. Romney himself will likely lose Massachusetts and Michigan, his "home" state, and his birth state.

Paka

(2,760 posts)
41. But it can work in the reverse.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:00 PM
Aug 2012

I skipped the 2000 election because I truly could not vote for a ticket with Lieberman on it. I consoled myself that it didn't affect the outcome because I was in Oregon and Gore took the state. I had just returned from a year in Africa and needed to re-register, but I was so repulsed by that scumbag being on the ticket I gave it a pass.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
137. You are right.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:32 PM
Aug 2012

I almost didn't vote in 2000 because I was so appalled at the choice of Lieberman.

I simply cannot imagine any candidate picking a VP that I'm so enamored of that I would then vote for the President I'd previously not been willing to vote for.

Which is actually why in more than one recent election cycle there's been a lot of nonsense about the top of the ticket picking a running mate from the other party. The underlying idea is that you then appeal to almost everyone from both parties, and that ticket wins big. Except that such a crossover would simply never happen given the way the political parties actually operate. Yes, sometimes a politician does change parties, and then is re-elected, now with a different initial after his name. But that's something entirely different.

Cosmocat

(14,562 posts)
43. It matters down ticket
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:03 PM
Aug 2012

It might not make a big difference in the presidential - but it changes the whole tone of the race.

To this point, it has been Romney flopping all over the place and saying Obama sucks. It now becomes a VERY defined policy race, and the Rs now have their agenda CLEARLY on the table, something they know people won't like, which is why we get the vague platitudes all the time.

But, it has the chance to REALLY help the senate/house races in that it now puts everyone senator/house member in a position to declare support for Ryan and by extension his budget. This thing is TOXIC to the point where it might cost them the House. I have been pretty sure the Ds had no chance at the House and would be lucky to just hold the Senate.

This puts the House in play, potentially.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
95. As a matter of fact
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 08:32 PM
Aug 2012

I expect a massive turnover of the R's in the House to the Dems and they hold the House for a long, long time.

No-one can trust the teabaggers to represent anyone or anything.

Cha

(297,133 posts)
57. It matters here because
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:23 PM
Aug 2012

ryan is tied to the gop house of failure and many many other votes in the bush-cheney admin that were Disasterous for our country.


"Picking Ryan Wasn't Bold; It Was Insane" by booman..

<snippet>

"1. It forced Romney to try and fail to distance himself from Paul Ryan's budget plan. Romney now says he would have signed Ryan's budget, and he therefore owns a budget plan so unpopular that people don't even believe it was actually proposed.

2. It locked Romney in to a plan that raises taxes on lower middle class folks while effectively zeroing out his own taxes.

3. It locked Romney into a program that voucherizes Medicare, and twins him with a candidate who wants to privatize Social Security."."


Much More..

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/8/12/12106/2055?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boomantribune%2FSvpw+%28Booman+Tribune%29

h/t theobamadiary

Duct Tape

(196 posts)
65. I agree for the most part, but back in '08
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:43 PM
Aug 2012

I did hear a number of people switch from McCain because of Palin. Also, don't underestimate the stupidity and sheep like tendencies of the American people. If Fox News pushes for the duo, which they will, and CNN follows, which they will, there's a chance that people may be drawn to the stupid "intellectual leader" mantra. I don't think they will, but don't rule it out completely.

LoisB

(7,200 posts)
81. Actually, I gave considerable thought to voting for John McCain until he picked Sister Sarah.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:08 PM
Aug 2012

That told me all I needed to know about John McCain.

Esse Quam Videri

(685 posts)
83. Actually, my mother-in-law, a registered Repug
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:16 PM
Aug 2012

Specifically did not vote for McCain last time because of his pick of the Alaskan Grifter. She saw the pick as an insult to women and as an attempt to just put a woman on the ticket.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
91. I recall the excitement around the Palin pick though
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:30 PM
Aug 2012

At least, at the time of the pick, it is natural to make a big deal of it in the news.

At least this time the R's don't get the drama and attention they got with Palin.

Of course it is not a sole reason, but it will have some effect. It'll become one more reason not to vote for the Mittwit.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
97. Four years ago, I heard some people say "I was going to vote for McCain,
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 09:41 PM
Aug 2012

but then he picked Palin as his VP, so I changed my mind."

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
104. I challenge that.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:08 AM
Aug 2012

Sarah Palin was poison for McCain. Indeed, I would point to Palin as the single biggest negative for McCain.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
108. Sarah Palin! People who might have voted for McCain would not vote for
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:34 AM
Aug 2012

him thanks to Sarah Palin.

Yes. The VP counts.

WooWooWoo

(454 posts)
126. no, i didn't forget about Palin
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 11:26 AM
Aug 2012

I just didn't know anyone who decided to switch their vote based on her. Plus, they lost anyway, and not by a margin great enough that you could make the case she alone was what cost McCain the election.

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
144. The woman is a national (and international) joke! She lost McCain the election, no doubt.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 02:20 PM
Aug 2012

I'm sure she wasn't the only thing, but she tipped him right over into the losing lane.

When Saturday Night Live makes a skit about you and most of it is take verbatim from your actual words, you've got a real negative on your hands, my friend. If Palin isn't the prime example of a VP choice destroying one's chances of getting elected, then I don't know who is. Ryan comes in a close second.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
6. It's potentially very telling that we are already hearing about this.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:21 PM
Aug 2012

Usually this is the kind of thing that comes out *after* a humiliating defeat.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
11. This was my first thought, too.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:22 PM
Aug 2012

No message control, at all. This kind of tell all usually doesn't hit the gossip circuit until after an election.

Wow.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
51. There was some grumbling back in 2008, too.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:16 PM
Aug 2012

But, now the Republicons are tired of losing, so they are emboldened to go public quicker.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
105. Usually, but
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:12 AM
Aug 2012

They see the writing on the wall and are hedging their bet. After Palin and the revealing movie "Game Change", they now have an avenue to "blame" the candidate. These are people that sell political "expertise" for a living.

The "handler" position is lucrative only for the winners. If they want a job next go round, they will have to point out they were "overruled" early.

NJCher

(35,652 posts)
142. excellent point
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 05:17 PM
Aug 2012

Your explanation makes consummate sense.

I am starting to think that r-money doesn't pay much attention to his staff and hasn't all along. He's another one who thinks he knows it all and doesn't understand the concept of group IQ.

This would explain why this campaign has been such a mess and for so long.



Andy823

(11,495 posts)
55. I totally agree
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:21 PM
Aug 2012

As long as Romney wants the Koch brothers money, he had to pick who they told him to. They like people like Ryan, ass kissers who will do anything to gain more power, and who will do anything to keep the "billionaires" happy! They think their money can buy them the country, but they are going to find out come November no matter how much money the dump into this presidential race, their Romney Ryan ticket isn't going anywhere! Let them waste their money.

 

lib2DaBone

(8,124 posts)
86. Agree.. Romney didnt pick Ryan...
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:22 PM
Aug 2012

the Koch Bros and Sheldon Adelson did.

Romney is just following orders.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
94. Exactly. It is not like th edecision was Romney's
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 08:28 PM
Aug 2012

Hell, he hasn't even put any of his own money into this thing, has he? It is just like Bain. Use other people's money.

But when you serve at the pleasure of a handful of multi-billionaires, you do what they say. Seriously, Romney has become pretty insignificant in this thing. Ryan is their boy. If their money can get him elected, they will expect Romney to stand on the sidelines. And if he isn't willing to do that, he'd better watch his back.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
12. men like romney are empty shells with an unnatural competitive streak
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:23 PM
Aug 2012

they are excellent at accumulating and using resources (people/money), but if they stand alone, they effectively have nothing but a fake smile.

many moons ago when i worked with executive leadership types in education, i noticed that the most effective ones worked diligently through some very smart people.

they never created anything of value on their own - some of the worse would read business self-help books and try to implement that as university policy. the results were hilarious to watch.

but for romney to not listen to those closest to him shows his competitiveness got the best of whatever good sense he MIGHT have.

that competitiveness is a weakness. the only thing romney knows is that he must win - at whatever cost.

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
13. Another Palin.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:23 PM
Aug 2012

All day I've been gloomy (about other stuff, not just politics) and all I can think of is that Ryan, after the first press "swoon" will end up being a liability, another Palin.

When it becomes apparent to even the 'low information' voters that Ryan wants to kill Medicare and do who-knows-what to SS, how can that possibly help Romney?

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
14. And right after he corrected the introduction he said,
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:24 PM
Aug 2012

"Every now and then, I'm known to make a mistake."

enough

(13,256 posts)
19. That was a weird moment, saying that while putting his arm around Ryan's shoulder.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:32 PM
Aug 2012

Even though he was supposedly referring to his previous gaffe, the effect was strange.

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
24. It was strange. And never a mention that his guy has no "real" business experience except
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:40 PM
Aug 2012

for driving the weiner mobil and selling weiners one summer.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
18. He did it hiiiiiis waaaaay.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:31 PM
Aug 2012
And now, the end is here
And so I face the final curtain
My friend, I'll say it clear
I'll state my case, of which I'm certain
I've lived a life that's full
I traveled each and ev'ry highway
And more, much more than this, I did it my way




sellitman

(11,606 posts)
20. A train wreck
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:35 PM
Aug 2012

Within hours Flipper was distancing himself from the Ryan Budget Plan.

So...

He distanced himself from his Governorship of Massachusetts

He distanced himself from his private sector wizardry at Bain Capitol

He distanced himself from His job of spreading tax dollars all over Salt Lake to make his Olympics run.

He distanced himself from responsibility of releasing his tax returns.

And now he is distancing himself with his VP's signature budget stance.


I smell fear.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
21. Ryan already seems to be overshadowing him
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:35 PM
Aug 2012

The base is going nuts for him, and suddenly big crowds are showing up that weren't there before. They're there to see Ryan, not Romney. Aside from the liabilities that Ryan and his famous budget pose in general, Romney aides are now having to explain to the press that Romney won't be following Paul Ryan's ideas; Ryan will be supporting Gov. Romney's ideas.

Oh man, you are in big trouble when everybody is treating your rock-star veep choice as if HE were the candidate.

calimary

(81,209 posts)
84. Yeah, I know what you mean. The last time we saw this "rock star VP candidate," it was sarah palin.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:16 PM
Aug 2012

I was gonna say sarah mcdingdong but I ran out of room in the reply title line.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
78. Gotta correct you on that. The large crowds could NOT have known Ryan would be the pick.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:00 PM
Aug 2012

The media tried to push that today.. saying "look how the crowds have turned out for RYAN!" Well.. the two events yesterday were ticketed, and invitation only. There is no way in hell that people knew it was Ryan before they got the tickets, as it was leaked the night before.

You're buying into the GOP narrative and the media BS. It's not true. It's simply not true. THe reason that they held the announcement near DC, is that they could bring as many GOP Staffer and officials and their families, etc. Virginia is filled with military OFFICERS, who tend to vote republicans.

It's a total stretch to say that the crowds turned out for Ryan yesterday... impossible.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
101. Untwist your panties!
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:47 PM
Aug 2012

I'm talking today, not yesterday. The bus tour, North Carolina, people lined the streets for the bus--not a ticketed event. Try reading (and taking a tranquilizer).

If you think those right wingers weren't energized by having their boy idol join the ticket, you're nuts. Not that it will do them any good. It's a terrible move for Romney. He's the candidate, and nobody likes him. And everybody thinks his number two is now running the show. It's a lose lose all around.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
110. Where did they line the street in NC?
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:37 AM
Aug 2012

They had a few hundred people in Mooresville at the NASCAR Tech Inst. looked like mostly same people outside and in. Not much crowd at all there.

More people at the High Point event. Looked like 1-2 thousand total. Only ones shown on local stations in NC were right at the events.

Got rather subdue coverage on all the regional TV stations. Friend in the business said only one CLT crew went to Mooresville. Rest just relied on national pool coverage.

Local media are POed because all their interviews planned with Romney were canceled after having been hyped for several days!! RR ignored their questions in passing, too. The event in RTP was downgraded to son Matt and gov candidate McCrory. They were dismissive of questions, too. Ouch!

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
112. The point is ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:50 AM
Aug 2012

No one was showing up for Mitt. Even if it was several thousand, that's a whole lot more than he's been generating.

What's the matter with you folks? Are you completely myopic? Can you only see things from your own perspective? The right-wing likes Paul Ryan. They liked Sarah Palin. It means nothing in terms of the election. In fact, it portends very poorly for Romney. Try to understand what is being said.

The point being made is that it is very bad for Romney when his base is so excited about his veep pick. He's allowing someone else to be the star for them, but pretty soon it will be clear that it is Romney who is their candidate, the one who has to do the three debates with Obama; the one who will have to distance himself from his running-mate's policies and votes. And that's never a good thing.

Don't worry. Be happy.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
115. "you folks"?!! Really?! Stick to IL, let me talk about NC
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:57 AM
Aug 2012

Re-read what I wrote. I'll try to explain it again in a way you might understand. This time when I type I will be very careful and slow.

What I just described to you was an extremely tepid, unenthused, relatively small crowd for Romney and Ryan. Really small considering how they had been hyping this.

Crowd size and excitement in VA had been the talking point Saturday evening. In that context, the two NC stops today were failures. The NC GOP can turn out a thousand or so of the faithful for almost anything, and that is all they did in High Point. I even recognized several GOP county-level officials from other parts of the state.

The RW in NC hates Wisconsin almost as much as they do Massachusetts. They will still vote against Obama. But RR is going to scare NC independents into voting Dem. I fully expect this to cause big problems for McCrory, the Repub candidate for gov who has worked hard on creating his image as a non-scary Republican.

Finally, most of the local stations carried video of Romney and Ryan arriving in charlotte on their bus tour -- by private plane at the CLT airport, getting into their cars. While not a secret, pointing this out repeatedly were the TV news crews making a statement. Just a little reminder.

Tunkamerica

(4,444 posts)
116. um... where did you hear they lined the streets? I mean I guess the 1700 or so stood outside before
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:51 AM
Aug 2012

being let into the venue, but even in high point I have a very hard time believing the streets were "lined".

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
26. Romney needs to change the terms of his Friday proposal
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:42 PM
Aug 2012

In addition to not talking about taxes or his business experience anymore, I'm sure Romney would appreciate it if we also didn't talk about his abortion of a running mate anymore either. It'd bereal helpful, and would show good sportsmanship.

Tax returns please, Mr. Romney.
What are you hiding offshore, Mr. Romney?
Which parts of Ryan's "budget" plan do you specifically disagree with, Mr. Romney?

BumRushDaShow

(128,826 posts)
27. Looks like this campaign has more than enough material for an HBO movie
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:45 PM
Aug 2012

just like "Game Change". They'll call it "Bold Move". Get Michael Douglas to play Rmoney (with that double entendre moment) and Johnny Depp could throw on some blue contact lenses and play Ryan.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
30. Amazing What Phone Calls From Adelson And Koch
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:51 PM
Aug 2012

Can do to influence the choice of VP pick over one's own staff. And that is the real story here. In fact, Ryan is flying out to meet with Adelson on Tuesday -- perhaps for a "thank you" check.

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
35. More proof Rmoney caved
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:55 PM
Aug 2012

to those who were pushing hard for Ryan the week before the pick was announced.

Portman was at the top of the list. I guarantee his campaign was pushing him to pick Portman because it was a safe choice - even when it was obvious they needed someone more exciting.

Mitt did as he was told. Good boy... Now sit!

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
37. Wow. I have never seen staff throw the boss under the bus in the middle of the campaign.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:56 PM
Aug 2012

Utter disaster. No message discipline, no loyalty. The rats are fleeing already.

chowder66

(9,067 posts)
38. I swear this guy does not want to be president. He just wants to reset the bar so low...
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:56 PM
Aug 2012

that it makes it even easier for the next republican grifter. Palin and McCain lowered it a fair amount... now Romney and Ryan have finished it off.

This should piss off all republicans that they are mocking and diminishing their own party's standard. The threshold has been obliterated and it's an utter embarrassment but the supporters refuse to see it.

I'm pretty sure Romney also is using some loophole somewhere and is making a shitload of money off just being the "Pretender" Nominee.

speedoo

(11,229 posts)
44. "... foreign policy advisor Dan Senor..."
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:06 PM
Aug 2012

Senor, the obnoxious, lying spokesman for the Bush-Cheney Iraq War, was one who favored the Ryan Choice.

Romney, the gift who keeps on giving.

Bush-Cheney, the gift that will give forever.

jonthebru

(1,034 posts)
47. Remember what Norquist said.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:11 PM
Aug 2012

It was something like: All we want is someone smart enough to hold a pen and sign the bills we put in front of him.
And McConnell who said "Our job as members of the Republican House of Representatives is to make Barack Obama a one term President."

Ashholes all!

It is our job to make certain that does not happen.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
48. Even more reason for me to believe that someone making big donations to the Romney campaign insisted
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:13 PM
Aug 2012

That Romney pick Ryan.

I know Koch Brothers are pretty thick with Wisconsin politicians, I wouldn't be shocked if they made the ultimatum.

subterranean

(3,427 posts)
60. When someone is spending millions to help you get elected
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:30 PM
Aug 2012

with promises of more to come, you bet you're going to listen to him.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
72. Bingo.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Aug 2012

They saw Romney wasn't exciting the base, and made the call to put their guy on the ticket. Millions of PAC money in ads and voter suppression will take care of the rest.

 

cleduc

(653 posts)
50. I think Romney saw his campaign in trouble
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:14 PM
Aug 2012

and panicked.

He spent only one hour talking with Ryan
His campaign did no polling analysis of their options (seems crazy to me)

The roll out seemed awkward and oddly timed.

The empressof all

(29,098 posts)
53. Romney is an empty suit
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:17 PM
Aug 2012

He believed the hype about Ryan and bought it hook line and sinker. He is so out of touch with reality he thinks Ryan is some sort of popular thinker. Jeeze...What a dolt he is.

sakabatou

(42,146 posts)
56. I can see a new ad from Obama:
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:21 PM
Aug 2012

"If Romney wouldn't listen to his advisors, why would he listen to the American people?"

rocktivity

(44,575 posts)
62. This says that the Romney camp is living in an even BIGGER fantasty world
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:40 PM
Aug 2012

than we thought. And that's saying a LOT:

“We are not auditioning for fearless leader,” Grover Norquist told conservatives at the CPAC convention in February. “We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget...We just need a president to sign this stuff...Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen..."

“The clamor you are hearing for Paul Ryan for VP is not about helping the Romney candidacy,” wrote conservative writer and former George W. Bush aide David Frum. “It’s about controlling the Romney campaign—and ultimately the Romney presidency. It’s about forcing a platform on Romney, and then dictating the agenda...If (Romney) accedes, it’s a big surrender of control—and a surrender to many of those who most opposed (and who inwardly continue to dislike) his nomination.”

...Those are the marching orders, and thus far they’ve controlled Romney’s campaign...
More


rocktivity

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
68. OK, this is beginning to scare me.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:46 PM
Aug 2012

It's really beginning to look like he's either trying to loose this thing, or the fix is in so big and bad that they know they can do whatever they want because the Rove/Koch voting machines will give them whatever number of votes they need

As for this,

"...and griped that Romney's top advisors have "been giving Mitt everything he wanted in this campaign."
Mitt was a child of privilege, and grew up to be a high ranking official in his church. He's been surrounded by "yes" men his whole life, and (sorry if I step on any toes, here) a probably fairly compliant wife. He's USED to getting his own way. I'm sure he's not about to change his ways now.

Trekologer

(997 posts)
70. It seems like a hastily made pick
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Aug 2012

The pick announcement is announced late on a Friday night and occurs early the next morning. At the announcement, there were no signs with Ryan's name on them, not at the campaign stop after it. Only later in the day did Romney/Ryan signs show up and only a few of them. Romney cancels scheduled interviews and campaign stops. This isn't the sign of a well-planned, well-executed running mate selection that the campaign is proud of.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
98. I didn't know about the signs.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 09:57 PM
Aug 2012

It's either Rmoney going rogue or some major donor gone wild.

The whole thing was just really bizarre. Chuck Todd and Wolf Blitzer at 10 pm to 2 am? Not normal.

If it really was Willard the decider who forced this precipitous decision, what does it say about his proclivity to make a similarly precipitous decision while in the White House.

Actually, though, maybe he's just like Foxconn waking workers at midnight, giving them tea and then making them work straight for 24 hours.

Maybe Willard liked the idea of pulling the chain of the media in the same way that Friedman liked the idea of the midnight awakenings.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
71. Knew it! I pegged Romney as a self-centered CEO type, who only listens to yes-men.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Aug 2012

Thus his daily disasters. He struck so many of us, during his numerous fuck-ups, as someone who just does what he wants.. thinks he knows better than anyone. Won't listen to advice or reason. He's used to being in charge, to being the bully.

And considering that his biggest donors and PAC donors are sons of the John Bircher Society, of course he picked a libertarian..

BREMPRO

(2,331 posts)
139. totally agree.. suffers from wealthy corporate CEO syndrome..
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:10 PM
Aug 2012

entitled arrogance and disassociated with reality and the masses.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
87. Romney should just stay in hiding...
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:24 PM
Aug 2012

Every time he comes out he does something colossally stupid. I keep thinking he can't top this and then the next time he opens his mouth or makes a decision he does. The tax thing dang, I thought this is really stupid, it makes him look weak. Then when Borat Romney went to London, I was amazed at his lack of manners to say the least. So, then he goes to Israel and tries to start WW3, ok that one made me a bit nervous. So, then he pulls a cry baby move and says don't talk about my record at _________ any place he has ever been. And we don't even get to celebrate that properly before he pulls the ultimate boner and picks a VP that just might be even more heartless than he is and this can't end well for him.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
89. Forget about political advice, this was about his financiers' mandates.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:27 PM
Aug 2012

If you think about where that money comes from,you quickly realize who picked Paul Ryan

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
92. We never can let Mittens forget that he now owns little Eddie Munster Jr.!
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 07:33 PM
Aug 2012

You bought it (broken in the first place) Mittens...now you own it!

still_one

(92,126 posts)
103. I don't believe it. I suspect they planted this story in the hope that the public will believe
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:52 PM
Aug 2012

Romney is his own person

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
106. Which
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:17 AM
Aug 2012

Last edited Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:36 AM - Edit history (1)

"I don't believe it. I suspect they planted this story in the hope that the public will believe Romney is his own person"

...just goes to show how much they suck. They got the opposite reaction to a tacit admission that people see Romney as a tool.




 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
111. Romney was 'advised' to choose a Cheney like Bush did.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:42 AM
Aug 2012

same old.

Bush Jr and Romney are just too fucking inept (except in that feral survival way) so they have to have a boy friday to do the actual decision making.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
114. I loathe Ryan's politics, but he is at least
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:36 AM
Aug 2012

a serious choice, unlike Palin or Cheney, or Quayle, or Agnew. Christie would have been a sick joke.

FlaGranny

(8,361 posts)
120. Ryan has
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:46 AM
Aug 2012

the "gift." He's articulate, smart, and charismatic. He is frightening. With the voter suppression, voting "irregularities," etc., I don't feel comfortable. Vouchers and privatized social security would put seniors back into the homes of their children and make them dependent, like they once were in the early 20th century. The middle class would sink further because of the financial burden of taking care of their parents. The 3-generation household would return.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
118. Personally I don't think rMoney had much choice
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:35 AM
Aug 2012

Who or what politician of any integrity would want to hitch his career to rMoney in any way. Paul rYan is just like the mitster in so many ways. For instance how did he amass his wealth while working for us the citizens of these united states? Answer me that

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
127. Integrity? We're talking about Republicans here.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 11:34 AM
Aug 2012

A lot of people would be only too eager to be on even a losing ticket. It gives you incredible exposure for your own political ambitions at someone else's expense. Most politicians have no shame. As long as they can be in the spotlight, they don't care.

The Snowdrift Grifter and her wretched family have done OK since the debacle of 2008. Had McCain not picked her, she probably would have gone on to quite the governor job and just open up a meth lab or something.

 

kitt6

(516 posts)
123. Romney is no longer interested
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 08:37 AM
Aug 2012

in the Presidency. He's in it for, lets just say attention. Might be something that gets him out of his dull existence.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
125. I've Been Correcly Predicting POTUS Elections
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 09:56 AM
Aug 2012

since grandpa reagan was elected in 1980.

No surprise Ryan's advisers advised against eddie munster; he's hideous.

when the Catholic bishops come out strongly (months ago) against how Paulie
thinks he's going to swing his cruel meat ax at our social safety net-- you
know there's a problem.

Rmoney may have just handed the election to Obama/Biden.

reflection

(6,286 posts)
130. I don't know...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:24 PM
Aug 2012

this sounds a little contrived... as if they are trying to make us believe that Romney has the strength of conviction to buck his own managers and handlers. "Look at how courageous he is!" Not that any of us will ever know for sure, but I don't Romney would take a bowel movement without getting approval first. I doubt he just grew a spine overnight.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
131. The Koch brothers have given heaps of money to Ryan in the past.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 12:43 PM
Aug 2012

It is obvious this pick was done with ultra right wing of the Repub party in control and not Mitt. He didn't listen to his staff because they aren't shoveling millions at him for his campaign.

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
134. "This is a F'ing sacred public office."
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:39 PM
Aug 2012

"Show some G@d D^*n respect and don't pick this F'ing loser."

Brooklyn Dame

(169 posts)
143. The GOP is using Mitt as a throw-away candidate...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:45 PM
Aug 2012

...so that they can build up Ryan over the next 4 years while he solidifies their plans to blast Social Security and Medicare out of existence.

http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/08/romneys-choice-makes-it-clear-this-aint-your-grandpas-gop/

ecstatic

(32,681 posts)
145. 2 rogues don't make a right
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 02:26 PM
Aug 2012

Romney is the Palin equivalent on his ticket. It'll be interesting to see this clusterf*ck unfolds.

magnifisense

(285 posts)
146. Too late now!
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 03:51 PM
Aug 2012

GOP, you're stuck with these two!

I just worry about the voter suppression and purges that could still cost us this election. No one should become complacent. I'm even guilty at times of getting too excited and thinking we have it in the bag. We must be vigilant.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Romney Staff Wa...