Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chichiri

(4,667 posts)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:05 PM Aug 2012

Atlas Shrugged: A Summary

With the renewed focus this week on the works of Paul rAyn Rand, it occurs to me that there are many DUers who have been fortunate enough to never read Rand's works. For their benefit, here is a summary of her magnum opus that I wrote some years ago. It's on the lengthy side, but believe me, it's many orders of magnitude shorter than the book itself, and you get the drift just as easily.

Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand (Random House, 1957) takes place in a universe where trucking, shipping and air freight are impractical, where hard alloys can be made of soft elements, where oil can be extracted from shale to any degree desired, where steam engines are incapable of out-pulling diesel, where gasoline does not evaporate over long periods of time, where sound waves can destroy structures hundreds of miles away without damaging the transmitter, and -- in a particularly important plot point -- where the laws of optics do not apply. It is a universe, in other words, that resembles our own so closely that the allegorical argument can easily be carried over to life in the real world.

Since the novel is for the most part character-driven, I will describe the more important characters as we meet them. Those we meet early on include:


* Dagny Taggart, an attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken, somewhat aloof railroad manager who is a hyper-capitalist.

* Hank Rearden, an attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken, somewhat aloof steel magnate who is a hyper-capitalist (but doesn't quite know it yet).

* James Taggart, a lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, grammatically challenged CEO who is desperate to kill your children and pets.

* Eddie Willers, a regular guy who works for Taggart Transcontinental, and who worships the ground Dagny walks on.


As the novel begins, Dagny, in order to preserve her flagship route's unbroken record of punctuality, orders the train's engineer to run a red light and assumes personal responsibility for the order. In this way, Dagny becomes personally responsible for a head-on collision of trains at eighty miles per hour killing hundreds of people.

Or would, if this were anything like the real world -- in this world, all goes well and the train pulls in on time.

Hank, a man who prides himself on always keeping his promises, invents a metal, which he modestly calls Rearden Metal, and which is virtually indestructible compared to Orren Boyle's Steel.


* Orren Boyle, a lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, grammatically challenged CEO who is desperate to kill your children and pets.


Dagny wants to build a new railroad out of Rearden Metal instead of Orren Steel -- since, as everyone knows, the brittleness of a material is inversely proportional to its owner's capitalistic tendencies. James refuses. Dagny goes to build it herself.

For a period of months, she works constantly, takes her type-A personality everywhere she goes, almost never sleeps, and lives pretty much on a diet of caffeine and nicotine. At the end of three months, she drops dead.

Or would, if this were anything like the real world -- in this world, she succeeds in building the railroad. Dagny and Hank celebrate by making the inaugural run of the new route to the oilfields of:

* Ellis Wyatt, an attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken, somewhat aloof oil magnate who is a hyper-capitalist.


They spend the night at Wyatt's pad, where Hank rapes Dagny. Kind of. Actually, she wanted it -- and will be the first to say so, as evidenced by a flashback to the first time she was kind-of-raped by her first lover:


* Francisco Something Something Something d'Anconia, an attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken, somewhat aloof copper magnate who is a hyper-capitalist.


Anyway, Dagny then begins a full-fledged affair with Hank, who prides himself on always keeping his promises. And who is married. Did I forget to mention that? Silly me. But don't worry, he's not breaking his marriage vows.


* Lillian Rearden, a lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, gramatically challenged housewife who is desperate to kill your children and pets.


Promises made to such people don't count.

Brother James, not wanting to feel left out, meets and marries a girl:


* Cherryl Brooks, a shop clerk who is completely irrelevant to the story of the novel, and exists only to prove a philosophical point, which she does by committing suicide about 600 pages later.


Meanwhile, the government seizes certain property, including Rearden Metal and Wyatt's oil. The hyper-capitalists believe that they have no right to do this; after all, their property is not legitimately their property because the government recognizes it as such and imposes limitations on property recognition, but because they created the land, metal and oil out of thin air, and patrol the boundaries every night with a rifle slung over their shoulder to keep out trespassers.

Hank strikes up a friendship with Francisco Something Something Something d'Anconia, who says that if he saw Atlas holding up the world, he would tell him to shrug. This is good novel titling, but bad mythology -- the Greek Titan Atlas did not, as Rand believed, hold up the world -- instead, he was holding up another Greek Titan -- namely, Uranus, the god of the sky. Hence, an equally appropriate title for this novel would have been, The Sky Is Falling.

Hank also meets a mysterious stranger:

* Ragnar Danneskjöld, an attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken, somewhat aloof pirate who is a hyper-capitalist.


Yes, I said pirate. In this world, piracy is perfectly acceptable, provided a hyper-capitalist does it for the purpose of furthering his political agenda.

Meanwhile, in Colorado, a Taggart train suffers various mechanical problems and is forced to take a diesel engine into a very long tunnel. Everyone on the train dies of asphyxiation. The author provides a very brief philosophical biography of all the waking passengers on the train, and makes it clear, as they go to their deaths, who they are.


* Every person who dies in the Winston Tunnel: a lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, grammatically challenged something-or-other who is desperate to kill your children and pets.


Yes, including the children on the train. The obvious implication is that they deserved their fate, and the author even suggests that they somehow caused it.

After dealing with the ensuing crisis the way only a hyper-capitalist can, Dagny meets a hobo who tells her about John Galt, an engineer who, when his company adopted some liberal policies, quit in protest and found work somewhere else.

Or would have, if this were the real world -- in this world, the company in question adopted full blown Marxism, and in response, Galt made a vow to destroy all of civilization.

Dagny comes to suspect that this John Galt is responsible for the rash of unexplained disappearances of hyper-capitalists around the country. She buys a plane, takes off in search of him -- somehow, in the midst of working herself to death keeping the railroad afloat, she found time to get her pilot's license.

Or not; she crashes.

When she comes to, she is looking at . . .


* John Galt, an extremely attractive, very hard-working, unbelievably creative, spellbindingly well-spoken, very much aloof engineer who is so hyper a hyper-capitalist that before long, Dagny dumps Hank and starts fucking John.


He's living in a cloaked valley with all the other hyper-capitalists that he persuaded to join him. Everything here is powered by the Galt Engine, a device that extracts energy from ambient static electricity -- literally drawing energy out of thin air. (Because they're in the mountains, ha ha.) They have their own little hyper-capitalist society, complete with currency in the form of gold.

They come here because John has talked them into going on strike from society -- in this world, it's appropriate to strike from society if you're a hyper-capitalist, but not if you're a teacher or a nurse. Dagny sympathizes, but goes back to the world because she loves her railroad.

Meanwhile, James Taggart and Lillian Rearden engage in a contemptible repudiation of life and existence: they have sex. You see, it's contemptible when communists commit adultery, but a grand, life-affirming act when hyper-capitalists do it.

Anyway, Cherryl catches them in the act, realizes that James is a communist -- something which he has remarkably kept secret from her during their entire marriage. She further realizes that the world is chock full of communists and, as noted earlier, promptly commits suicide to prove a philosophical point. This is tragic because she wanted to be a hyper-capitalist when she grew up -- as opposed to the children on the train in the tunnel, who of course were fully capable of understanding and willfully adhering to communism, and therefore deserved to die.

Well, with all the hyper-capitalists disappearing, civilization is beginning to fall apart piece by piece. Fortunately, there are intelligent and creative people who are not hyper-capitalists, who still give a damn about their fellow man, and who, with time, effort and teamwork, manage to put it all back together.

Or there would be, in the real world; in the world of the novel, no such luck. So it is that we meet . . .


* Mr. Thompson: a lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, grammatically challenged head of state who is desperate . . . yeah I know, you get the idea by now, but I had to suffer through more than eleven hundred pages full of tiny little words of this shit, and I want you to feel some of my pain, okay?


With the crisis deepening, he prepares to make a nationally broadcast speech on the radio -- but John Galt jams the signal, everywhere in the country, and gives a speech of his own.

The speech is sixty or seventy pages long, takes about three hours to read if you read it aloud, and constitutes the nucleus of Ayn Rand's philosophy. I will condense it here to twelve words: A equals A; therefore if you're not selfish, you deserve to die.

The government locates Galt and kidnaps him. Mr. Thompson and others try to persuade him to help repair things; Galt refuses. They torture him. It doesn't work; Galt is simply too fucking handsome to be tortured. Discovering this, James Taggart realizes for the first time that he is a communist asshole, and promptly goes catatonic.

This gives Dagny Taggart, Hank Rearden, Francisco Something Something Something d'Anconia and their buddies a chance to rescue him -- which they do, killing those who stand in their way, which is justified because they chose to stand in their way.

As they fly away, the cities go dark. Everything stops. (Eddie, the regular guy who worshiped the ground that Dagny and her buddies walked on, is on a train that breaks down at the time, and is abandoned in the middle of nowhere. There's probably a lesson there.)

And then all is well. The hyper-capitalists settle down to a simple but well-electrified life in Galt's Gulch, waiting for the day when the masses will beg for them to come back to the world. The book ends with John Galt standing and gazing out at the landscape, majestically tracing the sign of the dollar in the air.

There's no joke here -- that's exactly how the book ends.

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Atlas Shrugged: A Summary (Original Post) Chichiri Aug 2012 OP
Why were you not around to write this 49 years ago? Warpy Aug 2012 #1
I have a terrible confession to make. zeemike Aug 2012 #48
good post Skittles Aug 2012 #70
Well thanks zeemike Aug 2012 #84
I AM KICKING MY OWN ASS, ZEEMIKE Skittles Aug 2012 #87
Be kind to your ass Skittles. zeemike Aug 2012 #92
Here's my drunken review of Atlas Shrugged (the movie): joshcryer Aug 2012 #78
What a sickco rand is. /nt still_one Aug 2012 #2
Pretty much, and if you read about her history, it's not hard to figure out why Major Nikon Aug 2012 #25
That, and she grew up having to look at herself in the mirror. nt bupkus Aug 2012 #44
ROFL!!! truebrit71 Dec 2013 #98
Great summary. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2012 #3
That's no book, it's a doorstop. RoccoR5955 Aug 2012 #4
Almost exactly what my 8th grade book report said Scootaloo Aug 2012 #5
And to think I actually wanted to read this sophomoric crapola at one point in time. HughBeaumont Aug 2012 #6
Gawd, I Hate Admitting That I Read That Book. Paladin Aug 2012 #7
It happened to the best of us back then. hifiguy Aug 2012 #20
I could never make it through Rand. And I read Beyond Good and Evil in a day! Taverner Aug 2012 #33
Nietzsche was at least interesting. hifiguy Aug 2012 #38
He had a sense of humor, and I sometimes wonder if the race of Supermen was a joke... Taverner Aug 2012 #67
I couldn't finish Atlas Shrugged, but I loved Nietzche's "Antichrist." white_wolf Aug 2012 #73
That was way too long. Xipe Totec Aug 2012 #8
Maybe this? Sociopathy good normal society bad. LiberalLoner Aug 2012 #27
Mmmmuch-ch-ch-ch Be-he-he-he-tter-r-r-r Xipe Totec Aug 2012 #32
Yes, the summary was too long for me. And I'm a speed reader. freshwest Aug 2012 #75
I'm still kicking myself for the many, many hours I wasted kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #9
Eddie was the hero Bok_Tukalo Aug 2012 #10
There are a number of books that I have read and have loved so much that I have bought many libinnyandia Aug 2012 #11
Hilarious summary, BTW Bok_Tukalo Aug 2012 #12
There is a John Galt Boulevard in Omaha progressoid Aug 2012 #13
Nope, the guy who owned and developed the land was a fan. Brickbat Aug 2012 #18
Ugh. progressoid Aug 2012 #36
kick for later read newfie11 Aug 2012 #14
My sequel (I'm adapting some of your stuff into it) TlalocW Aug 2012 #15
Brilliant. hifiguy Aug 2012 #22
. XemaSab Aug 2012 #23
OMFG this would just so rule. I'd buy the DVD! Systematic Chaos Aug 2012 #29
Like this: The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2012 #41
Pretty Much My Thought erpowers Aug 2012 #61
It's pretty much what the original poster said TlalocW Aug 2012 #63
There was a great angry flower cartoon on that NutmegYankee Aug 2012 #42
That would make an interesting movie. zeemike Aug 2012 #43
Well, don't forget that what they had thought were burning cities Warpy Aug 2012 #66
I'll work that in. TlalocW Aug 2012 #74
That is utterly brilliant! Bravo! joshcryer Aug 2012 #79
Glorying in the deaths of the innocents in that horrific train accident is pure evil aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2012 #16
Thanks for the summary and this comment. Shared them on my fb wall. SleeplessinSoCal Aug 2012 #31
This is great! Thanks. You did a yeoman's job. Lint Head Aug 2012 #17
It really justified selfish behavior to the point of being destructive to the nation as a whole. SleeplessinSoCal Aug 2012 #35
It is amazing how much damage one author and a couple of books have done to the country. reformist2 Aug 2012 #40
It is like a false prophet thing. Or, profit. Lint Head Aug 2012 #69
what a great summary of one of the worst rbrnmw Aug 2012 #19
Don't forget the dollar is riverbendviewgal Aug 2012 #21
It was a coal powered engine, not a diesel, in the Taggart Tunnel. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #24
I read it as a kid too. In the words of Monty Python nolabear Aug 2012 #26
Amazing this exhibit of mental ill-health was ever published, much less read. n/t gkhouston Aug 2012 #28
Interesting story about the book's publication RZM Aug 2012 #91
LOL! Best synopsis ever - you should put that on Amazon.com reformist2 Aug 2012 #30
Oh absoLUTELY. If you do let me know and I'll start a "discussion." nolabear Aug 2012 #88
Atlas Shrugged 2: One Hour Later... RevStPatrick Aug 2012 #34
Brilliant! Major Nikon Aug 2012 #45
wow heaven05 Aug 2012 #37
Haha. You said Rand but I think you meant Ryan. How appropriate! bupkus Aug 2012 #47
ha ha heaven05 Aug 2012 #64
Not your bad at all bupkus Aug 2012 #65
K and R geardaddy Aug 2012 #39
And let's not forget this great moment in movie history . . . hatrack Aug 2012 #46
Damn, you beat me to it Canuckistanian Aug 2012 #68
K&R... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #49
thank you arely staircase Aug 2012 #50
The reason why the book is so popular with assholes is... Major Nikon Aug 2012 #51
Excellent summary freedom fighter jh Aug 2012 #52
That book sounds just awful. Alduin Aug 2012 #53
Did you ever see Michael Moore's TV Show "The Awful Truth?" TrollBuster9090 Aug 2012 #54
The law speaks: Jamaal510 Aug 2012 #55
I have to say it, your summary is actually better than the book itself 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #56
Thank you for saving Smilo Aug 2012 #57
Thanks for this. Delphinus Aug 2012 #58
THANKS so much, this save me the agony of having to read Raine Aug 2012 #59
Effin' great synopsis, Chichiri. WinstonSmith4740 Aug 2012 #60
I wish you'd publish this as a pamphlet or a graphic novel or something. Starry Messenger Aug 2012 #62
I read the Fountainhead when I was about 13 and thought it spoke to me... WCGreen Aug 2012 #71
"The graveyards of the world are full of indispensable men." Ikonoklast Aug 2012 #72
I'm tempted to read it now just to see if it could possibly be this bad. dkf Aug 2012 #76
The OP is actually an entertaining read. joshcryer Aug 2012 #80
Bioshock budkin Aug 2012 #77
briiiant. funny. spot on. I love you. cali Aug 2012 #81
I buy every cheap copy I see at Garage Sales and Care Acutely Aug 2012 #82
The real sequel... jmowreader Aug 2012 #83
Don't need an army. Their magical electrical machine blows worse than Chernobyl... hunter Aug 2012 #85
Don't need the magical electrical machine. nolabear Aug 2012 #89
That is a lovely thought - hifiguy Aug 2012 #93
Excellent. And, gack. The Fountainhead was the first book DirkGently Aug 2012 #86
The Fountainhead in 5 seconds Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #90
Beautifully Done, Sir! The Magistrate Aug 2012 #94
Atlas Shrugged 2: One hour later Fozzledick Aug 2012 #95
Ayn Rand boiled down to the essentials. BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2013 #96
Wow! Thank you for your sacrifice! calimary Dec 2013 #97

Warpy

(111,124 posts)
1. Why were you not around to write this 49 years ago?
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:16 PM
Aug 2012

You'd have saved me a week of sheer misery punctuated by occasional silly giggles because that book was so preposterous that even a kid still in public school couldn't possibly take it seriously.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
48. I have a terrible confession to make.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:27 PM
Aug 2012

But I was an impressionable kid of 18 when a right winger gave me the book to read and told me it was great...and sense he was older and I presumed wiser I believed it..and read the whole thing...although I did get tired trying to read John Galt's speech and skimmed through it to get back to the story....but I thought it really meant something and swallowed it whole.
The irony is that I was sitting in the library reading The Fountainhead when the librarian come over to me and said..."they shot the president in Dallas"
And then later one of my right wing mentors said "they finally shot that nigger loving son of a bitch"
That is when it all changed for me...that is when my eyes were open to just what this was all about...these fuckers were sick and I was sick and dumb to ever fall for that shit.

I envy those that could see right through it from the beginning...they had a proper upbringing I guess...and were not nearly as gullible as I was at 18.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
78. Here's my drunken review of Atlas Shrugged (the movie):
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 03:36 AM
Aug 2012

taggert works with smaller business "I need him he needs me" = bad

dagney works with monopoly "I need him he needs me" = good

reardan steel is scientifically unproven = bad

reardan steel is good, intitutionally speaking = good

reardan canceling all contracts with those who want to do business with him (having his secretrary throw their offers into the trash) if they are perceived as egalitarian = good

reardan not charging dagney 40k when she admits he can, and instead charging her 20k = good

reardan giving money to his friend (brother?) for social causes = bad, but he does it anyway because...?

mexicans are trying to develop their resources but they are going toward nationalization = bad

the US is in a very very dire situation with regards to iron reserves, and thus not doing business with the mexicans, who would sell those reserves regardless as to whether they are nationalized = good!

government of mexico nationalizes the taggart railroad line = bad

reducing taggart mexican railroad line traffic to nearly zero before the fact = good! (could it be that the railroad wasn't being properly utilized as the reason for the nationalization?)

san sambation uses fraud (selling empty mines) to get investors to buy into a scam causing billions of losses to taggart railroad = bad but borderline awesome ("you'll figure it out in time" "who's john galt?" = good! ) dagney just doesn't understand!

reardan is supposedly an engineering genius but is married to a "high maintenance" snobbish woman who simply cannot appreciate his ugly steel bracelet = bad

dagney, who took engineering in school and intuitively understood that the scientifically impossible reardan steel was awesome, loves the ugly bracelet, while herself wearing clothing throughout the movie that makes her "high mantainance" as well = good (she can't even put on a pants-suit? c'mon! )

reardan, the individualist, who refuses to do business with anyone who doesn't support his ideals, is happily served by servants at a party = good

reardan not going to the mexican copper mine owner to make a good investment = good

reardan working for his self interests, not 'others' = good (but don't forget those servants, steel workers, etc, who he pays to do his bidding)

dagney tries trading her diamond and platinum (?) necklace for a reardan steel necklace = good! (theft of trade secrets = good! )

railroad lines hadn't been replaced in a HUNDRED years! wow! = bad (WTF they let the lines be in a state of disrepair for 100 years!!?)

reardan steel magically fixes this problem of a HUNDRED YEARS OF DISREPAIR! = good

125 miles of track replaced in one month, with hard to refine, expensive, reardan steel = good (uh, how about use regular iron and fucking REPAIR your tracks, idiots! )

quark, the capitalist on star trek, arguing against capitalism, arguing against reardan metal! "if it *is good, it poses a social danger*" ( WTF!! mind blown, Shimerman must have been desperate! ) lol, mind fucking blown!

reardan keeping his magical metal a trade secret, and not licensing the technology to anyone who asks = good! (what the fuck, no patent licencing!? only exclusivity? ridiculous)

state science institute warning against magical reardan metal = bad (science = bad, the scientists conspire against the strength and wonder of the metal! )

science institute relies on public money and therefore must lie about the scary reardan metal = bad (WRONG, science CANNOT be manipulated by public money, it is an impossiblity, because science relies on reproducibility! )

in order to save the family business, abandon it = good!

dumping the taggart railroad line, setting up a fake company to restore it (renaming the temporary line to the "john galt line" ) = good

this deal, require the politicians to get behind it! the very politicians who have tried sabotaging everything at every move = good (I thought paying off politicians was bad? I probably left that part out, before, but I'm too lazy to rewind)

pimping out ones body = good

calling the new line the "john galt line" = good and doesn't necessitate pimping out ones body (total deviation from the book since in it dagney got RAPED)

bankers not investing in the new line = bad

financing from top CEOs who have monopolies and going to another CEO for the difference (ie begging for investment money) = good

equalization of companies (one company per owner) = bad, but signing over the companies to friends and family in a true case of cronyism = good management!

a union leader not wanting their people to run people on untested, unscientifically proven technology = bad

telling union members they're out of a job to run on unscientifically proven technology = good (don't worry, I expect the "maiden run" of the train will succeed, despite being unscientifically proven, "Mrs. Taggart, who is John Galt?" "We are!" )

train successfully runs on unscientifically proven technology which defies the laws of physics in every way and works perfectly = good

250 mph on metal tracks = good (but impossible, of course, especially considering the curves that the train is being forced to take! magic motherfuckers!!!!! omg, I'm actually sick watching this part! madness)

state science institute actually predicts failure of the magical reardan steel line resulting in 300 miles in less than 90 minutes averaging a whooping 200 mph on a METAL TRACK = bad (disproving that they're scientific, or proving that this entire movie is totally bonkers! )

the success of the magical metal can work to the advantage of the dirty socialists! = bad (what the fuck! I can't wait to see how they explain that one! )

adultery = good (in the book it was RAPE)

company with amazing motor innovation collapses because it paid the staff according to their "wages" and not their "needs." quality dropped, company went under, despite the revolutionary engine designs = bad (what the fuck! if you have revolutionary designs, it shouldn't matter how the employees are paid! )

feynman diagram on the chalkboard, lol. how many people actually recognize that? it's a relatively basic diagram, but I laughed. (they're in the "magic engine factory" which was shut down because the employees were supposed to get the "equal product of their labor," omg, I hate Ayn Rand, seriously, what.the.fuck).

lol, magic energy engine discovery, without knowledge of the designer, and actually looking for the designer as opposed to stealing the magic technology as was established a good idea earlier = good (we gotta find out who designed it, that nice, awesome person, fuck developing it! )

we need to get the designer of the magic engine to help us get it up and running despite that we have a fucking WORKING PROTOTYPE = good

evil government worried about the abilities of magical reardan steel which isn't scientifically established, reducing speeds to 60 mph = bad

tipping 150% = good (wtf? this movie only takes place 4 years from now, what a ridiculous tip! it wasn't a starbucks, either. I thought dagney was supposed to be a genius capitalist? and yes, I just checked, that was a $5 that she left! assuming a $1.50 cup of coffee the highest tip would've been $0.45, or basically $2! I thought these were genius capitalists! )

driving very fast on a really crappy road = good (I hope dagney crashes)

making it so that all companies have equal access to resources (ie anti-competitive laws which are already in place) = bad (dagney has yet to crash, sadly, even though she's driving on a dirt road at this point)

john galt sounds like jesus = good (OK, I want to meet this wonderful John talk to John Wyatt, who is now on "strike" )

I was drunk when I wrote it and would stop to write a bit. I had to clean it up because it was posted on FB and I'd get flamed here for some of my drunken statements.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
25. Pretty much, and if you read about her history, it's not hard to figure out why
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:31 PM
Aug 2012

She came from a wealthy family. When she was 12 the Russian Revolution led to the communists taking her father's business, which eventually resulted in abject poverty and near starvation for her. There's no doubt this led to her irrational hatred of all things remotely resembling collectivism.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
6. And to think I actually wanted to read this sophomoric crapola at one point in time.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:34 PM
Aug 2012

What we know as a flatulent and scattershot mound of words and pulp has now become the American basis of economic thought for many a corporate magnate and politician, including the Republican Nominees. I think that's even sadder than the novel's success.

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
7. Gawd, I Hate Admitting That I Read That Book.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:35 PM
Aug 2012

I was young, stupid and in college. Mea fucking culpa.

Excellent summary of a truly vile work, Chichiri.
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
20. It happened to the best of us back then.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:15 PM
Aug 2012

I flirted with Rand's work for a few months after seeing her on Tom Snyder back in the day. Read "The Fountainhead" "Anthem" and a bunch of her nonfiction. Was 200+ pages into Atlas Farted when I sat down and thought through what a Randian society would actually look like. I shuddered and never opened the book again. Rand's writing is the ultimate nerdish adolescent power fantasy.

Someone on the intertubes said that Ayn Rand is to the Ryans and Rand Pauls of this world what Charlie was to the Manson Family: the central lunatic. A better description could not be imagined.

“Two novels can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other involves orcs.”

- Kung Fu Monkey

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
33. I could never make it through Rand. And I read Beyond Good and Evil in a day!
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:56 PM
Aug 2012

I figured, if I can make it through Nietzsche I can make it through Rand

Man, was I wrong.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
38. Nietzsche was at least interesting.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:03 PM
Aug 2012

At least I thought so. Nietzsche also had a sense of humor, something Rand couldn't have found with a pack of bloodhounds.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
67. He had a sense of humor, and I sometimes wonder if the race of Supermen was a joke...
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:10 PM
Aug 2012

I mean, he just gets downright goofy when talking about that!

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
73. I couldn't finish Atlas Shrugged, but I loved Nietzche's "Antichrist."
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:48 AM
Aug 2012

I really liked his section on Buddhism even if I disagree with him.

Xipe Totec

(43,888 posts)
8. That was way too long.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:37 PM
Aug 2012

Is there a cliff notes version of your summary for us lazy, unreasonable, unproductive, whiny, hypocritical, communist, physically repugnant, grammatically challenged readers who are desperate to kill your children and pets?



 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
9. I'm still kicking myself for the many, many hours I wasted
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:39 PM
Aug 2012

reading this novel not once.......not twice........but at least 5 times before I realized that I HATED "objectivism".

Please forgive me.

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
11. There are a number of books that I have read and have loved so much that I have bought many
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:47 PM
Aug 2012

copies of them and have given them to my friends to read. Atlas Shrugged is not one of them. In the 45 years since I read that book I have not once considered reading it again. And if I had ever met anyone who loved the book, I would never, ever be friends with them.

progressoid

(49,933 posts)
13. There is a John Galt Boulevard in Omaha
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:50 PM
Aug 2012

I'm hoping the name is just a coincidence and not actually named after this douche.

TlalocW

(15,373 posts)
15. My sequel (I'm adapting some of your stuff into it)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:55 PM
Aug 2012

Probably be about 50 pages long. Maybe 35 minutes if made into a movie (with credits). I'll treat it as a movie instead of a book. I figure this is what happens immediately after Rand's book ends.

John stops tracing the sign of the dollar into the air and with a quick look out at the burning cities viewable from the hyper-capitalists' mountain fortress, he turns to the rest of them, claps his hands together and says, "Well, being a handsome, hyper-capitalist gives me an appetite! What's for dinner?" After initial titters from his fellow capitalists, it slowly dawns on them that gold is not edible, and they 1.) only have a small amount of food in their storehouses because they all got tired transporting it and couldn't convince any of the lower class to do it for them and 2.) have no idea how to farm, herd, etc., and there isn't enough food to feed all of them for very long. So being good Randians concerned primarily with their own welfare, they all dash out of the room, throwing elbows, tripping, etc. to reach the food and/or weapons (depending on their reasoning) first. Camera swoops up and out to show hand-to-hand fighting, people getting the weapons, and people scrambling to get away with as much food as possible.

Slow wipe to black to new scene.

The scene is the same as past scenes in the mountain fortress, but where it was once pristine, well-lit with powerful-looking statues embodying their ideals, it's now filthy; only a few lights work; statues have been knocked down and destroyed, their pieces carted off by the various tribes that now make up the mountain fortress. Small fires flicker in the hallways and large gathering rooms. John Galt, still handsome but with a drawn face displaying a combination of fear, hunger, and just a bit of that rugged confidence, is seen in filthy, torn clothes, slowly working his way down a hall, his back against the wall, trying to peer around corners. His breath is ragged, and he knows he's in enemy territory. He clutches a single can of beans that he's found, and he's trying to make it back to the safety of his tribe's territory, already planning on how he's going to hide the beans from the rest of them so he can eat all of it. A door he's just passed opens quickly and members of a rival gang spill out of it. Galt takes off running into one of the huge gathering areas, dodging rocks and poorly sharpened sticks thrown at him. He dives behind the remnant of a statue of Atlas, almost unrecognizable now. He hugs the far side of it, trying to gain strength from its cold solidness and bolts, heading for another hallway and possible safety. A rock hits him squarely in the back, causing him to stumble and 5 hyper-capitalists drag him to the ground. His neck is efficiently broken by one of them, and his body is dragged back to the tribe's hq. The can of beans unseen as it had bounced out of site down a dark hall when Galt went down.

The tribe is elated at the success of the "hunting" party. As the more adept at carving up meat hyper-capitalists start in on their gruesome task, others throw flammable material into one of the cooking fires, while others fight over the meager possessions Galt carried with him before being killed.

As things settle down, more of the tribe gather around the cooking fire. One of the hyper-capitalists exclaims, "Hey! I recognize this guy! This is John Galt!"
One of his companions asks, "Who's John Galt?"
"Dinner!" replies a third.

Laughter rings throughout the tribe's hq as the camera zooms away from them, melting through walls, showing similar scenes of depravity, filthy hallways with small fires burning in them, etc. until the camera is on the outside of the mountain, still zooming away. In its "wake," the full mountain is seen, the only dark and foreboding thing displayed on what seems to be a nice day, complete with rainbow. Further out, you can see a large fence has been built around the base of the mountain. At that point the camera stops and begins a pan to the left, leaving the view of the mountain to show scenes of parents playing catch with their kids, adults building homes, people reading in a park, etc. Faraway in the distance a train is seen making its way who knows where.

Music swells. THE END.

TlalocW

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
61. Pretty Much My Thought
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:35 PM
Aug 2012

I have never read Atlas Shrugged or any of Ayn Rand's novels, but since the selection of Paul Ryan I have been hearing about Rand's views. It seemed like Rand wanted to get rid of poor people and anyone who wanted to help the poor. My question was if you get rid of the workers who is going to make your products? You could theoretically have robots build your products, but who would build the robots?

From what I have heard about her and her writing she did not think her ideas through? How do you increase your business profits if government does not build roads and bridges? What would happen if there were no fire departments? How would fires be put out?

TlalocW

(15,373 posts)
63. It's pretty much what the original poster said
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:14 PM
Aug 2012

The people who were Objectivists were handsome, rugged and intelligent for whom everything worked out almost magically. Everyone else were disgusting piglets trying to tear them down. Roads and bridges? One of those rugged uber-capitalists would come up with Star Trek like teleportation using just $10,000, and that's what will happen in the future when the objectivists take over.

TlalocW

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
43. That would make an interesting movie.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:08 PM
Aug 2012

But you leave out the heroin Dagney Taggart...who probably sets up shop and let's people rape her for a can of beans.

Warpy

(111,124 posts)
66. Well, don't forget that what they had thought were burning cities
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 09:10 PM
Aug 2012

were only a few campfires during the mercifully brief dislocation when Galt and his buddies completely crashed the financial system as they left in a huff. Another exchange method denoting worth of actual goods and services was soon adopted, one that was not amenable to the Galts of the world amassing most of it and starving everyone who produced the goods and services.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
16. Glorying in the deaths of the innocents in that horrific train accident is pure evil
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 04:56 PM
Aug 2012

Of course Rand doesn't think they are innocent and thinks they deserve their horrific fate because they receive government loans, or are married to federal workers, or don't like businessmen, or otherwise are what she considers subhuman. I don't think a book glorifying Satanism could be less moral and those who admire Rand should be exposed for the worshippers of evil that they are.


Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
17. This is great! Thanks. You did a yeoman's job.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:01 PM
Aug 2012

I am saving your synopsis and passing it along to friends. Ayn Rand was considered an intellectual. After becoming familiar with her years ago it became evident she was nothing more than a self important narcissistic sociopath. Anyone can learn the technical skills it takes to write stories and if one is as full of oneself as she was one can promote any ideology no matter how despicable it is.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,082 posts)
35. It really justified selfish behavior to the point of being destructive to the nation as a whole.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:57 PM
Aug 2012

Why else the sudden lack of concern for outsourcing our economy?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
24. It was a coal powered engine, not a diesel, in the Taggart Tunnel.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:26 PM
Aug 2012

Otherwise, this is spot on.

I giggled a bit every time at "Francisco Something Something Something d'Anconia"


Fucking book is a boat anchor.

nolabear

(41,930 posts)
26. I read it as a kid too. In the words of Monty Python
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 05:32 PM
Aug 2012

"turned me into a newt! (long pause) I got better."

Beautiful summary of a ridiculous tome.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
91. Interesting story about the book's publication
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 08:46 PM
Aug 2012
When Bennett Cerf, a head of Random House, begged her to cut Galt’s speech, Rand replied with what Heller calls “a comment that became publishing legend”: “Would you cut the Bible?” One can imagine what Cerf thought — he had already told Rand plainly, “I find your political philosophy abhorrent” — but the strange thing is that Rand’s grandiosity turned out to be perfectly justified.

In fact, any editor certainly would cut the Bible, if an agent submitted it as a new work of fiction. But Cerf offered Rand an alternative: if she gave up 7 cents per copy in royalties, she could have the extra paper needed to print Galt’s oration.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/books/review/Kirsch-t.html

nolabear

(41,930 posts)
88. Oh absoLUTELY. If you do let me know and I'll start a "discussion."
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 08:15 PM
Aug 2012

Although I'll bet it's a jungle over there.

 

bupkus

(1,981 posts)
47. Haha. You said Rand but I think you meant Ryan. How appropriate!
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:27 PM
Aug 2012

Like Romney calling Ryan the next president of the United States.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
51. The reason why the book is so popular with assholes is...
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:46 PM
Aug 2012

because it tells them they really aren't assholes. When you tell people what they want to hear, you don't have to write a great story or even make sense.

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
52. Excellent summary
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:52 PM
Aug 2012

I read that book 30-some years ago at the insistence of my capitalist aunt. At that time I believed pretty much everything I read, and I didn't question that there was a good message in this book. To the extent that it made no sense to me I just figured it was my problem for not understanding, and I thought maybe one day I'd come back to it.

Recently I re-read not Atlas Shrugged but The Fountainhead. When I got to a sentence where a welder's hand trembled as the welder held his hand steady I realized that this was not much different from a barefoot boy with shoes on who stood sitting in the grass -- some parts of it really do make no sense.

 

Alduin

(501 posts)
53. That book sounds just awful.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 06:57 PM
Aug 2012

I'm sorry you had to read it.

Thank you for providing us with a brief synopsis of the book.

TrollBuster9090

(5,953 posts)
54. Did you ever see Michael Moore's TV Show "The Awful Truth?"
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:00 PM
Aug 2012

I wish I could find a youtube clip of this, and maybe somebody else knows of one...but there is one episode where he explodes the myth that the wealthy are smarter, more resourceful, and just plain superior to the working class.

He stands on a street corner and asks regular ppl questions like "what do you do when the toilet won't flush?" The regular ppl answer "jiggle the handle." He does the same thing outside some top end stores and banks frequented by the wealthy, asks them the same question, and their answer is usually "I don't know. Call a plumber."

Bottom line: if all the wealthy "producers" ran off to form their own village, they'd starve within a week without their Honduran maid to show them how to operate an electric can opener to open a can of beans.

Leaving aside the twits who inherited their fortunes, even the so called self-made billionaires didn't get rich by doing something useful. As Mitt Romney has already proven, he "earns" money WITH money, enjoying the preferentially low Capital Gains tax rates on investment returns, with the investments being made mostly by somebody else. Thus using each of his dollar bills like a little share cropper from the feudal era of medieval europe. And how did he GET that money to begin with? From other wealthy plutocrats, of course, who initially invested in Bain Capital.

The fact is that most of today's financial elite got rich through smoke and mirrors, and by knowing how to AVOID having to pay any taxes. You can account for half of Romney's fortune from that, having made money by "chopping" companies the way a car thief chops cars, he then skillfully AVOIDED having to pay any of it in taxes.

Financial elites making their fortune by knowing how to build a static electricity perpetual motion machine? Give me a break. The only skill these people have is access to the most skillful tax avoidance lawyers in the country, and knowing how to exploit every loophole in the tax code. These people are not "creators" and "producers." They're what REAL economists call FREE RIDERS.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
56. I have to say it, your summary is actually better than the book itself
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:05 PM
Aug 2012

Rarely is the movie better than the book, but in this case the summary sure is a lot better than the original tale.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
57. Thank you for saving
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:06 PM
Aug 2012

me from reading this drivel. I always wondered who John Galt was - wasn't missing anything there.

How the hell can the right wing morons take this book seriously - of course we all know that the right wing bastards are selfish, corrupt, greedy and sociopathic, so can't be too surprised.

Delphinus

(11,824 posts)
58. Thanks for this.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:17 PM
Aug 2012

I admit to reading the book, gosh, back in the 80s and had not remembered an awful lot of it.

WinstonSmith4740

(3,055 posts)
60. Effin' great synopsis, Chichiri.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:25 PM
Aug 2012

The first time I read this I was young and impressionable, and like so many kids, thought I could do it all by myself, so this was in my mind, a great book. I'll admit to skimming Galt's speech the first time...it was just so damn repetitive! I picked the book up again a few years later, and almost gagged. That's when the hypocrisy hit me. Remember the throw away line about Hank Reardon's meeting with the head of the union at his plant? I'm paraphrasing here, as I no longer own the book, but the gist of it was that even though Hank's plant was unionized, the title of union head was titular, as Hank always treated his men well, and paid them above average for the industry. Well, if that was true, unions wouldn't have a place in society. But it wasn't true then, and it sure as hell isn't true now. I think that's when the light came on. Later on, it hit me that all those rugged "attractive, hard-working, creative, well-spoken" capitalists formed a damn commune when they dropped out of society. I forced myself to read the rest of the book, including Galt's manifesto, put it down and said to myself, "she is SO full of shit."

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
71. I read the Fountainhead when I was about 13 and thought it spoke to me...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:28 AM
Aug 2012

I thought it was romanticizing the individual over the masses. Being that I was an almost ostracized youth in my high school, you can understand...

Then there was Kent State...

Then I saw McGovern in 1972...

That election changed me because I realized at the tender age of 14, I saw what an ass hole Nixon was and that McGovern was talking to me.

Then I saw the movie and laugh my ass off at how strident and predictable the characters were.

Then I got laid and I have to tell you, I left all those childish notions behind....

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
72. "The graveyards of the world are full of indispensable men."
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:44 AM
Aug 2012

- Charles De Gaulle.


Every billionaire industrialist on this planet could disappear from the face of the Earth this moment, and the only lives changed would be those of their families.

The rest of the world would hardly be impacted in any serious way.

Yet, this is how Objectivists see themselves; all of existence revolves around them, all is there to serve their needs, no one else matters.

They got it exactly backwards.

We don't need THEM.

budkin

(6,698 posts)
77. Bioshock
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 03:00 AM
Aug 2012

Play the game Bioshock if you really want to see how a Randian utopia world would play out. Hint: it doesn't go well.

Care Acutely

(1,370 posts)
82. I buy every cheap copy I see at Garage Sales and
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 04:56 AM
Aug 2012

Inform the sellers it will soon be processed in my recycling bin.

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
83. The real sequel...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 05:15 AM
Aug 2012

The regular guys wait till the hyper-capitalists all retreat to Galt's Gulch and head for the nearest army base. There they find self-propelled howitzers and ammunition, which they use to shell Galt's Gulch flat with all the hyper-capitalists locked inside. The hyper-capitalists destroyed, the world becomes a much saner place.

The end.

hunter

(38,301 posts)
85. Don't need an army. Their magical electrical machine blows worse than Chernobyl...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 04:21 PM
Aug 2012

... because their magical metal is unstable.

And then mutant cockroaches eat them all.

The end.

nolabear

(41,930 posts)
89. Don't need the magical electrical machine.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 08:25 PM
Aug 2012

"Atlas Shrugged: The Cannibal Years."

(Betcha it would outsell Pride and Prejudice and Zombies)

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
86. Excellent. And, gack. The Fountainhead was the first book
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 05:59 PM
Aug 2012

I remember not bothering to finish. Recommendation of a then-girlfriend who didn't work out.

Gack.

Gack.

$

Gack.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
96. Ayn Rand boiled down to the essentials.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:00 PM
Jan 2013

This is sooooo fricken hilarious!

Makes me tempted to have a look at the original just for educational purposes.

calimary

(81,091 posts)
97. Wow! Thank you for your sacrifice!
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 03:02 PM
Dec 2013

You sacrificed a small chunk of your life to spare the rest of us from having to wade through several inches of ayn rand's paper-bound door-stop diarrhea! One hell of an effort!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Atlas Shrugged: A Summary