Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
3. Correct me if wrong.
Fri Nov 2, 2018, 11:00 PM
Nov 2018

None of this is accounted in polling? Don’t they use the past history to build their models?

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
6. They may try to account for it moving forward, but this blows up current "Likely Voter" models
Fri Nov 2, 2018, 11:02 PM
Nov 2018

It can't be bad for democrats.

Those numbers in TX, TN and GA are nuts!

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
4. Wow. I don't really know, though, how they know that. In EV in TX, no one
Fri Nov 2, 2018, 11:00 PM
Nov 2018

asked even what party I was with let alone my age/race, whatever.

I have been curious ....it's that Dem polling outfit that somehow interviews people?

Not doubting #s

Qutzupalotl

(14,286 posts)
8. I'm going on the assumption that high turnout favors Dems.
Fri Nov 2, 2018, 11:32 PM
Nov 2018

But you’re right, we can’t tell how people are voting. People could vote differently from their affiliation and we wouldn’t know. But I think it’s a safe bet we’re winning most of these races.

Bengus81

(6,928 posts)
17. When myself and my friends were that age we ALL voted for Dems......
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:11 PM
Nov 2018

Of course Nixon was still bombing north Vietnam with no end in sight. We were TRULY voting for our LIVES.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»18-29 year olds SURGE in ...