Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(13,706 posts)
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 07:12 PM Nov 2018

US Supreme Court allows historic kids' climate lawsuit to go forward

From https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07214-2

US Supreme Court allows historic kids' climate lawsuit to go forward
Case aims to compel the government to slash greenhouse-gas emissions.

Emma Marris
03 NOVEMBER 2018


A group of children and young people are suing the US government (shown here with lawyer Julia Olson) to force stronger action on climate change.Credit: Robin Loznak/ZUMA Wire

A landmark climate-change lawsuit brought by young people against the US government can proceed, the Supreme Court said on 2 November. The case, Juliana v. United States, had been scheduled to begin trial on 29 October in Eugene, Oregon, in a federal district court. But those plans were scrapped last month after President Donald Trump's administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene and dismiss the case.

The plaintiffs, who include 21 people ranging in age from 11 to 22, allege that the government has violated their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property by failing to prevent dangerous climate change. They are asking the district court to order the federal government to prepare a plan that will ensure the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere falls below 350 parts per million by 2100, down from an average of 405 parts per million in 2017.

By contrast, the US Department of Justice argues that “there is no right to ‘a climate system capable of sustaining human life’” — as the Juliana plaintiffs assert.

Although the Supreme Court has now denied the Trump administration's request to the dismiss the case, the path ahead is unclear. In its 2 November order, the Supreme Court suggested that a federal appeals court should consider the administration's arguments before any trial starts in the Oregon district court.

...



More at link.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Supreme Court allows h...