Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 03:55 PM Nov 2018

NYT: Conway (her husband) "Appointment of Whitaker is Unconstitutional"


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html

Neal Katyal and George Conway, writing in the New York Times:

President Trump’s installation of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general of the United States after forcing the resignation of Jeff Sessions is unconstitutional. It’s illegal. And it means that anything Mr. Whitaker does, or tries to do, in that position is invalid.

Much of the commentary about Mr. Whitaker’s appointment has focused on all sorts of technical points about the Vacancies Reform Act and Justice Department succession statutes. But the flaw in the appointment of Mr. Whitaker, who was Mr. Sessions’s chief of staff at the Justice Department, runs much deeper. It defies one of the explicit checks and balances set out in the Constitution, a provision designed to protect us all against the centralization of government power.

If you don’t believe us, then take it from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whom President Trump once called his “favorite” sitting justice. Last year, the Supreme Court examined the question of whether the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board had been lawfully appointed to his job without Senate confirmation. The Supreme Court held the appointment invalid on a statutory ground.

Justice Thomas agreed with the judgment, but wrote separately to emphasize that even if the statute had allowed the appointment, the Constitution’s Appointments Clause would not have. The officer in question was a principal officer, he concluded. And the public interest protected by the Appointments Clause was a critical one: The Constitution’s drafters, Justice Thomas argued, “recognized the serious risk for abuse and corruption posed by permitting one person to fill every office in the government.” Which is why, he pointed out, the framers provided for advice and consent of the Senate



16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
1. You know that this is going to be the lead on the RMS. Can't wait to see how she sets it up
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:03 PM
Nov 2018


Will she start with Kelly Anne Conway or Justice Thomas?

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
10. I'll check in with Rachel at 20 past the hour, after she gets done with her usual
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:27 PM
Nov 2018

vocal masturbation setting up a simple story.

Raven

(13,889 posts)
2. I don't know how this couple stays together...
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:06 PM
Nov 2018

the differences between them are so profound, it just boggles the mind.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
6. Unlike Carville and Matalin (who I also don't understand) the Conways cross each other in open oppo
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:24 PM
Nov 2018

Carville and Matalin didn't really publicly undermine each other.

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
3. It's really hard not to speculate about what the evenings are like in that household.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:09 PM
Nov 2018

Tell you the truth, I think it's a mild marital conspiracy. They both loathe Trump, but she's making half the family income doing whatever the heck she does at the White House. So when she "lets" him do his op-ed thing, she's hoping she's saving her soul or her reputation. And they can tell the kids, "Mommy doesn't mean any of that stuff she says!"

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
4. Napolitano said this yesterday and Tom Perez,
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:13 PM
Nov 2018

who was a Assistant Attorney General ,said the same thing on MSNBC, Trump can't appoint even an interim AG unless they've been previously confirmed by the Senate in some other position.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
7. What baffles me is not one reporter has brought this up. They keep acting like it's legal that
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:36 PM
Nov 2018

Trump can do this.So I'm glad Conway and Katyal published this in the NYT.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
11. Ari and Chris Hayes both got into this illegality yesterday on their shows.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:29 PM
Nov 2018

So some reporters have been reporting it.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
9. so did unblock yesterday. Who has standing to file?
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:51 PM
Nov 2018
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211388685#post25

I would laugh so hard I would give my self a hernia and a tonsillectomy at the same time if Conway files and it is

Conway vs The Government of the United States.
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
12. Just a side note, and not to take away from the instructive legal arguments and minds here,but ....
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:37 PM
Nov 2018

am I the only one who is tired of "Kellyane's husband" label? Can't they at least call him G. Conway? He's the sane one, FFS, and deals in truth, law and learned justice.

Rant over. Carry on.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
16. Normally I would but I can't resist because it is Kellyane.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:35 PM
Nov 2018

My mind drafts it as "G. Conway" but my fingers insist on "Kellyane's husband".
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Conway (her husband)...