Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:05 PM Nov 2018

People calling for Trump's impeachment remind me of Miguel Hidalgo


People calling for Trump's immediate impeachment and removal, confident that 20 Republican Senators will go along with it once they read Mueller's report, remind me of Miguel Hidalgo

When he started the Mexican War of Independence, Father Hidalgo was convinced that the righteousness of his cause would carry the day. And so he proceeded to go directly after his enemies with direct attacks, getting thousands of his followers slaughtered and himself arrested, tried by the Spanish Inquisition, and then executed.

Eventually, tactically savvy conservatives slowly took over the war for independence and established a monarchy and dictatorship in the wake of the chaos. Mexico had to wait another hundred years before it got a real Revolution

All because Miguel Hidalgo thought the righteousness of his cause meant he didn't have to use smart tactics to win. Or possibly, a lifetime reading Rousseau, Locke, and Montesquieu didn't leave him prepared for how to go about fighting a war.

The war for protecting the American Constitution is a war I want to wage non-violently, of course. But there are two tactical alternatives facing the resistance against Trump's fascism. One way is to dash toward immediate impeachment and hope we can get to a senate removal vote (based on evidence from the Mueller probe and public pressure from a perfectly informed and irate electorate).

This direct attack is like how Hidalgo would swarm the peones against the battlements, hoping that he had more peasants than the Spanish Army had bullets. It was not an effective strategy.

The other way takes more time. We have to win back our democracy democratically. We have to knock on doors, stir up votes, support progressive legislation in Congress, work for politics that improves people's lives, and earned the respect and support of the public we wish to serve.

Just as Miguel Hidalgo thought righteousness and a benevolent God would rescue his poorly armed peones from defeat, there are those of us who think a Congress from on high will come down, deus ex machina, and impeach away our troubles, thus saving the Republic.

I don't think we get off that easy. Our long march to Bataan will need to run through every voting precinct in every red, blue, and purple district of the country. We did good last Tuesday. We need to keep on keeping on, you keep on putting in the sweat, and do better in 2020.

Our children are counting on us
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People calling for Trump's impeachment remind me of Miguel Hidalgo (Original Post) Bucky Nov 2018 OP
Trump was found to be personally involved in an illegal in kind contribution JonLP24 Nov 2018 #1
He hasn't been indicted nor convicted of anything. We all agree he is SCUM, but blind impeachment LBM20 Nov 2018 #4
He is an unindicted co-conspirator JonLP24 Nov 2018 #7
If you haven't figured out that Trump is able to get away with breaking the law Bucky Nov 2018 #8
Holding him accountable for his crimes is not "playing his game" JonLP24 Nov 2018 #9
Great historical perspective. Right on the money. n/t libdem4life Nov 2018 #2
Bad analogy. Not even close. stopbush Nov 2018 #3
It's a perfect analogy, and blind impeachment would be SO bad. Get him at the voting booth. LBM20 Nov 2018 #5
Yes, it's still a struggle. Bucky Nov 2018 #6
Fuck the people in the middle. stopbush Nov 2018 #18
Exactly. Rizen Nov 2018 #17
Or, maybe we'll succeed in laying the foundation for the removal of those Senators in their Baitball Blogger Nov 2018 #10
Please tell me what senators are under threat from anti Trump voters Bucky Nov 2018 #11
Your kind of reasoning is what keeps the good ole boy network or status quo in control Baitball Blogger Nov 2018 #12
"Wouldn't it be cool if..." has a strong appeal. And that's all Trump impeachment talk is. Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #13
no one i know is advocating blind impeachment. Its all predicated of rule of law and beachbum bob Nov 2018 #14
Mildly amusing horseshit Vinnie From Indy Nov 2018 #15
"The similarities are quite striking. It is almost as if they are the same person...." LanternWaste Nov 2018 #19
People who post irrelevant historical comparisons Rizen Nov 2018 #16

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
1. Trump was found to be personally involved in an illegal in kind contribution
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:07 PM
Nov 2018

That is just yesterday alone.

 

LBM20

(1,580 posts)
4. He hasn't been indicted nor convicted of anything. We all agree he is SCUM, but blind impeachment
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:15 PM
Nov 2018

is TOTALLY DUMB. Would not fly in the Senate. Get him on the policy narrative and agenda and at the voting booth.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
7. He is an unindicted co-conspirator
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:21 PM
Nov 2018

There is a question whether you can indict a sitting President. Most likely scenario Mueller makes a final report and gives it to Rosenstein or whoever replaces him then it will be up to him to give the report to Congress and if they are crimes listed like obstruction of justice you move forward with impeachment.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
8. If you haven't figured out that Trump is able to get away with breaking the law
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:22 PM
Nov 2018

then you haven't been paying attention. We are not going to win at his game. We have to move the conflict to a field where we can win.

The places that we have been winning are in the voting booths. That's why Republicans are so desperate to suppress the vote. So voting is the ground we need to fight on.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
9. Holding him accountable for his crimes is not "playing his game"
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:24 PM
Nov 2018

We can do both. The GOP has been in charge so it will be easier to conduct real investigations.

stopbush

(24,393 posts)
3. Bad analogy. Not even close.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:11 PM
Nov 2018

You’re likening an actual war in Mexico to the present-day USA, which is not only not having an internal war for independence, but that has a Constitution that offers a remedy in black and white on how the country can legally and peacefully remove a despot like tRump.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
6. Yes, it's still a struggle.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:19 PM
Nov 2018

I'm saying there are smart ways and stupid ways to fight it. You counting on the Constitutional process for impeachment and removal to work like some impartial machine of justice seems a little naive.

The real battle field is not the legal process, but the hearts and minds of the voting public. And right now, a lot of people in the middle do not trust us to look after their interests.

stopbush

(24,393 posts)
18. Fuck the people in the middle.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 03:27 PM
Nov 2018

Ds need to do what they were elected to do. Most of the country hates tRump. Almost half want him impeached and removed. The Rs don’t give a shit about the middle. They get elected and do whatever they want. The only reason they got killed this time around was people voting a check on tRump. Were he a normal person who could shut up, the Rs probably would have kept both houses and continued their assault on democracy. And no one would have chided them for not looking out for the middle, no more so than those in the middle.

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
10. Or, maybe we'll succeed in laying the foundation for the removal of those Senators in their
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:24 PM
Nov 2018

next election?

Remember, Trump is going to be gridlocked these next two years. Republicans will have no use for him.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
11. Please tell me what senators are under threat from anti Trump voters
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:30 PM
Nov 2018

I don't think your headcount is going to get to 20. For that matter, I don't think that head count for Democratic Senators is going to get to 20

At the end of the day Republicans are working for corporations who they will turn to for big fat well-paid retirements when they leave the Senate.

And besides, you're acting like the Republican senators are pulling Trump's strings. He owns them. He directs the mob of idiot voters that they count on for reelection. No one pulls his strings except Putin and the Russian mobsters that he's been laundering money for all these years.

I'm talking about the pragmatics of resisting Trump and the fascism he represents. Every call for immediate impeachment seem to be rooted in the abstract theories of a purely idealistic world that none of us live in

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
12. Your kind of reasoning is what keeps the good ole boy network or status quo in control
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:42 PM
Nov 2018

There is a term that our backwater attorneys use to explain what they are willing to support if done quietly, and what they will do if the word is out in the public: "...if word gets out on the street."

See, they know what they're supposed to be doing legally and what is legally actionable. But they also know that the wheels of justice are slow. In fact, they know there are so many hurdles that have to be jumped, that most people won't attempt it. It's just too hard...what does anyone have to gain...will people be targeted by the hometown mobs if they speak out? See, 100 reasons to convince yourself to stay quiet and only one to go forward: Because, by putting the word out on the street, maybe you'll gain enough support from decent people to help you challenge a corrupt, abusive situation.

By no surprise, minorities and women are leading the charge on change in this era. Your way has gone on for too long, which is why nothing has changed until now.

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
13. "Wouldn't it be cool if..." has a strong appeal. And that's all Trump impeachment talk is.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 02:24 PM
Nov 2018

No need to base it in reality. No need to have even a slight possibility it might ever actually happen. I'm just relieved our professional politicians don't waste any time on this nonsense except to blow it off.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
14. no one i know is advocating blind impeachment. Its all predicated of rule of law and
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 02:43 PM
Nov 2018

obstruction of justice

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
19. "The similarities are quite striking. It is almost as if they are the same person...."
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 06:57 PM
Nov 2018


Amusing, indeed.

Rizen

(707 posts)
16. People who post irrelevant historical comparisons
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 03:02 PM
Nov 2018

remind me why democrats lose. Democrats need to project strength, the strength to lead a nation. Not be bullied into submission by Republicans refusing to uphold the constitution. So what if the Senate doesn't remove Trump from office? That's the Republicans' failing but the House won't be ours.

What's it going to take for Trump to warrant impeachment? Misuse of campaign finances to pay off a porn star he slept with while married? Obstruction of justice by firing the FBI director for investigating him? Using his position in the government to further his business? Conspiracy against the USA by getting campaign aid from a foreign adversary?

Guess what? He did all that! Mueller has already pulled over 30 indictments and guilty pleas iirc.

The price of not doing our duty is worse, not just morally but politically. I support waiting for the right time of course but if Trump's cronies try to shut down the investigation it's up to Democrats to pick up where Mueller left off.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People calling for Trump'...