General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNothing moves House Republicans to embrace bipartisanship like a
clear Democratic majority. The airwaves are filled with their plaintive pleas for "putting aside partisan differences".
Really triggering my gag reflex today.
msongs
(67,394 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,112 posts)OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)willing, but those dirty Dems....blah blah blah
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)louis-t
(23,292 posts)bi-partisan." Rethug Traitors.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)unblock
(52,195 posts)Their idea of bipartisanship involves denying a sitting president any day in putting a justice on the Supreme Court, changing the rules to deny a democratic minority in the senat from having any say in putting a justice on the Supreme Court, and putting an accused attempted rapist on the Supreme Court by the lowest vote margin in history over the objections of millions of women.
If that's their idea of bipartisanship, then I think we should absolutely work toward that and let them have exactly what they're asking for.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)The reason is that this time, the partinsanship isn't about political outlooks or worldviews.
It's about to what extent the Republican pResident broke the law, cheated to get elected, obstructed justice both before and after the fact, and how MUCH money he helped steal from the general population of Russian taxpayers.
So NO, because this is about the Rule of Law, and you either support that endeavor...or....you don't.
Run for reelction on Not - Law.
Nancy Pelosi fucking DARES YOU hahahhahahaha!