Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhitaker Claimed There Was No Evidence Russia Interfered in the 2016 Election
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/11/acting-attorney-general-matt-whitaker-claimed-there-was-no-evidence-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-election/
As soon as President Donald Trump installed Matt Whitaker as acting attorney general, media outlets began mining his appearances as a radio and television pundit and discovered he had repeatedly denigrated the Mueller investigation, which he now will be overseeing, and claimed there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Mother Jones reported that Whitaker had gone so far as to claim that Trump, as president, had the power to kill the Mueller probeor any slice of itfor any reason and was immune to any charge of obstruction of justice. All of this has led to critics questioning whether Whitaker ought to recuse himself from the Trump-Russia investigationwhich he has declined to doand speculation that Whitaker would accept a Trump order to crush the Mueller investigation.
Well, theres more. On one of his 2017 pundit outings, Whittaker even denied that Moscow had attacked the 2016 campaign. During a May 30, 2017, radio show appearance, he declared, A foreign power attempting to interfere in elections is obviously a very salacious claim, but you know again I have not seen a single fact that would suggest that anything like that has happened. But this doesnt prevent folks from going on CNN and other media outlets and saying that it happened.
Note the date. Whitaker said this five months after the US intelligence community had publicly released an assessment that concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. The report, issued on January 6, 2017, noted, Russias goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary [Hillary] Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. The document said the secret Kremlin scheme blended covert intelligence operationssuch as cyber activitywith overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or trolls.' In other words, Moscow attacked the United States with information warfare in part to help Trump win the presidency.
***
Here is a clue. In an interview a week earlier, Whitaker pushed the conspiracy theory that talk of Russia intervention was nothing but a hoax cooked up by the media and Trumps political enemies: You have a media that does not like this president or this administration. And its trying toI think its successfully now hamstrung him and made him pretty ineffective at least in the near term with a special counsel being appointed to investigate the situation with Russia. I cant see a single shred of evidence to suggest that anything happened. And so I think you have a media together with a minority party in the Democrats that you know dont want to see Donald Trumps vision for America implemented. Got that? Nothing had happened. It was all a media fabrication concocted to lead to a special counsel investigation that would damage Trumps presidency.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 640 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whitaker Claimed There Was No Evidence Russia Interfered in the 2016 Election (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Nov 2018
OP
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)1. Whitaker should be investigated for his Russian connections
spanone
(135,795 posts)2. THAT alone should disqualify him. He doesn't believe our intelligence agencies.