General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVermont's US Attorney clears Jane Sanders of Burlington College wrongdoing
Link to tweet
Sen. Bernie Sanders' wife, Jane O'Meara Sanders, will not face any criminal charges related to a land deal at the former Burlington College.
U.S. Attorney for Vermont Christina Nolan closed the investigation into any wrongdoing by Jane Sanders.
A spokesman for Jane Sanders made the announcement Tuesday afternoon.
"Jane is grateful that the investigation has come to an end," he said. "As she has said from the beginning she has done nothing wrong and Jane is pleased that the matter has now come to a conclusion."
QC
(26,371 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)not that Jane was cleared of wrongdoing, but other than that I wouldn't call this fake news, QC. It's over, and most of us are not Vermonters, so let's let them move on as far as we're concerned.
George II
(67,782 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)breathlessly repeated this "scandal" will now come here and have a come to Jesus moment, admitting that they just wanted to believe anything that made Sanders dirty, and that they now regret leaping before looking.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...The Sanders schadenfreude posse will avoid this OP like the plague. Sorry, but Bernie and Jane have been the stars of just about every conspiracy theory possible. What amazes me is many of the persons that decried the very same treatment of Hillary Clinton rushed to judgment against Bernie and Jane Sanders with eager aplomb.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)"Jane Sanders Scandal Comes to a Head!"....nothing comes out.
progressoid
(49,987 posts)for using the phrase, "with eager aplomb."
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Can't even get conversions designed to point fingers out in the public anymore. What's the damn world comin' to when good old fashioned petulance is mocked.
Good luck stormin' 'da castle!
JCanete
(5,272 posts)false, I guarantee you, I will admit to it, and I'll be ashamed to have been so ready to believe the thing. I try not to.
For your part, I think you missed my point. If anybody did come out and say that, I'd be amazed and entirely supportive. People can make mistakes and they can learn from them. They can even continue to dislike Bernie and Jane for whatever reasons they may still have for that.
My point is we won't see anybody on these boards admit to having jumped the gun. I'm not hoping they come here to be shamed, because that would not happen, certainly not by me. I'm expecting, as I stated, that nobody who believed the scandal hook line and sinker, or at least purported to believe the scandal and perpetuated it, will come now and say that they regret fanning the flames.
If we get one...I'll come back and say I was wrong. Deal?
Response to JCanete (Reply #7)
Hortensis This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Who wanted the FBI to hurry up and indict Hillary.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)On Fox News of all places.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)She laughed when she said: Would be nice if the FBI would move it (investigation of Hillary's emails) along.
We all know what she was saying.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)the FBI should hurry up and indict. That's a flat-out falsehood.
Response to JCanete (Reply #13)
Post removed
JCanete
(5,272 posts)Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Why do you think he did? He lost in MARCH and kept going for what reason?
JCanete
(5,272 posts)To give visibility to progressive issues and hopefully pull candidates and party to the left. He had the greatest leverage by prosecuting the campaign up to the election.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)and that they will find out what the situation was...and that it would be nice if the fbi moved it along. Where did she say hurry up and indict?
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)were not salivating at the prospect of a Hillary indictment? Sure....
JCanete
(5,272 posts)Clinton supporters, is a fairly big cross-section of the population. I would have no qualms admonishing anybody who was hoping Clinton would go down for some believed but unsubstantiated crime, and who was throwing it around among all the other shit that he or she was trying to get to stick.
Voltaire2
(13,023 posts)said she wanted the FBI to indict Clinton. Not some random person. But you knew that.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The investigation centered on a 2010 land purchase that relocated the college Jane Sanders previously ran to a new campus on more than 32 acres along Lake Champlain. While lining up a $6.7 million loan and additional financing, she told college trustees and lenders that the college had commitments for millions of dollars in donations that could be used to repay the loan, according to former trustees and state officials.
Trustees said they later discovered that many of the donors had not agreed to the amounts or the timing of the donations listed on documents Sanders provided to a state bonding agency and a bank. That led to her resignation in 2011 amid complaints from some trustees that she had provided inaccurate information, former college officials said.
Jeff Weaver, who served as campaign manager for Bernie Sanders during his 2016 presidential campaign and remains an adviser, said Jane Sanders had been told in recent days that the land deal is no longer under investigation.
Jane Sanders has been informed that the U.S. Attorney in Vermont has closed its investigation of the Burlington College land deal and has decided not to bring charges of any kind, Weaver said in a statement. Jane is grateful that the investigation has come to an end. As she has said from the beginning she has done nothing wrong, and Jane is pleased that the matter has now come to a conclusion.
Kraig LaPorte, a spokesman for the U.S. attorneys office in Vermont, would not confirm or deny the existence of an investigation, in keeping with office policy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-prosecutors-drop-investigation-of-wife-of-bernie-sanders-adviser-says/2018/11/13/4b567468-e76e-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.7e79045f7f39
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)just not criminally responsible.
You take your victories where you can get them, I guess.
Sid
Small-Axe
(359 posts)They declined to prosecute. Not the same thing.
It remains that Jane Sanders' mismanagement bankrupted Burlington College. She was not honest about donor income when she filed bank loan reports.
She took a $200,000 "golden parachute" after ruining the finances of the college and she spent $500,000 of the school's funds for her daughter to teach woodworking.
A pretty stinky affair.
If a Republican acted in the same way Bernie Sanders would be howling.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Point to some examples of that happening, as opposed to a decision to decline to prosecute.
Small-Axe
(359 posts)What Jane Sanders is reported to have done in misrepresenting donations is troubling.
Filing false loan applications is grounds for being charged with bank fraud.
George II
(67,782 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)up a story out of what has hardly been mainstream news about not being indicted, only to find out in a week or month, what-have you, that Jane is infact being indicted. , and now she's a liar to boot. What would they gain from that exactly?
None of that is proof, because as the FBI has stated, it does not make public whether or not it has concluded or even is engaged in an investigation(although it has said that it informs the parties), but if you were a betting man, I'd be very interested in what odds you'd give the likelihood of an indictment coming down the pike at this point.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)A spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Christina Nolan said he could not confirm or deny an investigation had even happened. Numerous trustees and others have reported being interviewed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
We dont confirm or deny the existence of an investigation or that an investigation was in play. I dont have any information for you, said Kraig Laporte of the U.S. Attorneys office in Burlington.
I understand your concern, Laporte said when asked about the credibility of the Weaver statement. I can say we do communicate with represented parties, but I cant comment relative to your inquiry.
We cant control what people say, Laporte said.
Small-Axe
(359 posts)Local knowledge.