Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Donkees

(31,387 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:09 PM Nov 2018

Vermont's US Attorney clears Jane Sanders of Burlington College wrongdoing





BURLINGTON, Vt. —

Sen. Bernie Sanders' wife, Jane O'Meara Sanders, will not face any criminal charges related to a land deal at the former Burlington College.

U.S. Attorney for Vermont Christina Nolan closed the investigation into any wrongdoing by Jane Sanders.

A spokesman for Jane Sanders made the announcement Tuesday afternoon.

"Jane is grateful that the investigation has come to an end," he said. "As she has said from the beginning she has done nothing wrong and Jane is pleased that the matter has now come to a conclusion."
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vermont's US Attorney clears Jane Sanders of Burlington College wrongdoing (Original Post) Donkees Nov 2018 OP
FAKE NEWS!!! FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!! QC Nov 2018 #1
Jeff Weaver said the US Attorney won't bring criminal charges, Hortensis Nov 2018 #15
Precisely. People should read Weaver's and the US Attorney's actual words. George II Nov 2018 #24
Oh NO! I predict this post won't sink after 4 or 5 responses because everybody who JCanete Nov 2018 #2
That's a laugh... Raster Nov 2018 #3
damn, if only the title had been worded differently, this would have been like flies to honey... JCanete Nov 2018 #4
I'd like to rec this post progressoid Nov 2018 #30
Must be a tough old world... LanternWaste Nov 2018 #6
the OP isn't designed to do that. For my part if I ever buy into something that turns out to be JCanete Nov 2018 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Hortensis Nov 2018 #33
It was Jane Tavarious Jackson Nov 2018 #8
+1 MrsCoffee Nov 2018 #9
not what was said was it. JCanete Nov 2018 #11
Seriously? MrsCoffee Nov 2018 #12
yeah, and it was meant and even taken by cavuto, as one way or the other. She didn't say JCanete Nov 2018 #13
Post removed Post removed Nov 2018 #16
according to who, that was the whole reason Sanders took it to the convention? nt JCanete Nov 2018 #19
According to me. Tavarious Jackson Nov 2018 #21
to influence the democratic platform, in my humble opinion. Which is the only reason he ever ran. JCanete Nov 2018 #25
Well.. No one will be trying to shove him down my throat. Tavarious Jackson Nov 2018 #22
where do you find that? I just went looking. Jane said there was a process and it was moving forward JCanete Nov 2018 #10
You mean Bernie supporters Tavarious Jackson Nov 2018 #17
maybe....here on DU? I care about how we do here. Bernie supporters, like JCanete Nov 2018 #18
The assertion was that Jane Sanders Voltaire2 Nov 2018 #28
Finally the bullshit talking point is put to rest. Power 2 the People Nov 2018 #5
WaPo: "Federal prosecutors drop investigation of wife of Bernie Sanders" Hortensis Nov 2018 #14
So she was responsible for the death of Burlington College... SidDithers Nov 2018 #20
When did prosecutors say that Jane Sanders was cleared of any wrongdoing? Small-Axe Nov 2018 #23
Prosecutors virtually never "clear" someone of "wrongdoing" jberryhill Nov 2018 #26
Correct. So it is false to claim she was "cleared." She wasn't. Small-Axe Nov 2018 #27
You're correct, they never said it. See my post #29 for a clearer idea of the situation. George II Nov 2018 #31
Hey...keep the hope alive, am I right? I'm totally sure that Jane and Weave are going to dredge JCanete Nov 2018 #34
What does all of that mean? George II Nov 2018 #35
According to VTDigger, this may not be entirely the case: George II Nov 2018 #29
VT Digger is also a good source of information on the allegations made against Jane Sanders. Small-Axe Nov 2018 #32

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. Jeff Weaver said the US Attorney won't bring criminal charges,
Reply to QC (Reply #1)
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:22 PM
Nov 2018

not that Jane was cleared of wrongdoing, but other than that I wouldn't call this fake news, QC. It's over, and most of us are not Vermonters, so let's let them move on as far as we're concerned.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
2. Oh NO! I predict this post won't sink after 4 or 5 responses because everybody who
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:11 PM
Nov 2018

breathlessly repeated this "scandal" will now come here and have a come to Jesus moment, admitting that they just wanted to believe anything that made Sanders dirty, and that they now regret leaping before looking.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
3. That's a laugh...
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:29 PM
Nov 2018

...The Sanders schadenfreude posse will avoid this OP like the plague. Sorry, but Bernie and Jane have been the stars of just about every conspiracy theory possible. What amazes me is many of the persons that decried the very same treatment of Hillary Clinton rushed to judgment against Bernie and Jane Sanders with eager aplomb.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
4. damn, if only the title had been worded differently, this would have been like flies to honey...
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:32 PM
Nov 2018


"Jane Sanders Scandal Comes to a Head!"....nothing comes out.
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
6. Must be a tough old world...
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:50 PM
Nov 2018

Can't even get conversions designed to point fingers out in the public anymore. What's the damn world comin' to when good old fashioned petulance is mocked.

Good luck stormin' 'da castle!

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
7. the OP isn't designed to do that. For my part if I ever buy into something that turns out to be
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 04:58 PM
Nov 2018

false, I guarantee you, I will admit to it, and I'll be ashamed to have been so ready to believe the thing. I try not to.


For your part, I think you missed my point. If anybody did come out and say that, I'd be amazed and entirely supportive. People can make mistakes and they can learn from them. They can even continue to dislike Bernie and Jane for whatever reasons they may still have for that.

My point is we won't see anybody on these boards admit to having jumped the gun. I'm not hoping they come here to be shamed, because that would not happen, certainly not by me. I'm expecting, as I stated, that nobody who believed the scandal hook line and sinker, or at least purported to believe the scandal and perpetuated it, will come now and say that they regret fanning the flames.

If we get one...I'll come back and say I was wrong. Deal?

Response to JCanete (Reply #7)

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
12. Seriously?
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:15 PM
Nov 2018

She laughed when she said: Would be nice if the FBI would move it (investigation of Hillary's emails) along.

We all know what she was saying.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
13. yeah, and it was meant and even taken by cavuto, as one way or the other. She didn't say
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:16 PM
Nov 2018

the FBI should hurry up and indict. That's a flat-out falsehood.

Response to JCanete (Reply #13)

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
25. to influence the democratic platform, in my humble opinion. Which is the only reason he ever ran.
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 07:23 PM
Nov 2018

To give visibility to progressive issues and hopefully pull candidates and party to the left. He had the greatest leverage by prosecuting the campaign up to the election.
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
10. where do you find that? I just went looking. Jane said there was a process and it was moving forward
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:13 PM
Nov 2018

and that they will find out what the situation was...and that it would be nice if the fbi moved it along. Where did she say hurry up and indict?
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
18. maybe....here on DU? I care about how we do here. Bernie supporters, like
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 06:00 PM
Nov 2018

Clinton supporters, is a fairly big cross-section of the population. I would have no qualms admonishing anybody who was hoping Clinton would go down for some believed but unsubstantiated crime, and who was throwing it around among all the other shit that he or she was trying to get to stick.

Voltaire2

(13,023 posts)
28. The assertion was that Jane Sanders
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 08:05 PM
Nov 2018

said she wanted the FBI to indict Clinton. Not some random person. But you knew that.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. WaPo: "Federal prosecutors drop investigation of wife of Bernie Sanders"
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 05:20 PM
Nov 2018
The U.S. attorney in Vermont has told Jane Sanders, the wife of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), that the office has completed an investigation related to her stewardship of Burlington College and decided not to bring charges, a top adviser to the senator said Tuesday.

The investigation centered on a 2010 land purchase that relocated the college Jane Sanders previously ran to a new campus on more than 32 acres along Lake Champlain. While lining up a $6.7 million loan and additional financing, she told college trustees and lenders that the college had commitments for millions of dollars in donations that could be used to repay the loan, according to former trustees and state officials.

Trustees said they later discovered that many of the donors had not agreed to the amounts or the timing of the donations listed on documents Sanders provided to a state bonding agency and a bank. That led to her resignation in 2011 amid complaints from some trustees that she had provided inaccurate information, former college officials said.

Jeff Weaver, who served as campaign manager for Bernie Sanders during his 2016 presidential campaign and remains an adviser, said Jane Sanders had been told “in recent days” that the land deal is no longer under investigation.

“Jane Sanders has been informed that the U.S. Attorney in Vermont has closed its investigation of the Burlington College land deal and has decided not to bring charges of any kind,” Weaver said in a statement. “Jane is grateful that the investigation has come to an end. As she has said from the beginning she has done nothing wrong, and Jane is pleased that the matter has now come to a conclusion.”

Kraig LaPorte, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Vermont, would not confirm or deny the existence of an investigation, in keeping with office policy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-prosecutors-drop-investigation-of-wife-of-bernie-sanders-adviser-says/2018/11/13/4b567468-e76e-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.7e79045f7f39

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
20. So she was responsible for the death of Burlington College...
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 06:13 PM
Nov 2018

just not criminally responsible.

You take your victories where you can get them, I guess.

Sid

 

Small-Axe

(359 posts)
23. When did prosecutors say that Jane Sanders was cleared of any wrongdoing?
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 06:48 PM
Nov 2018

They declined to prosecute. Not the same thing.

It remains that Jane Sanders' mismanagement bankrupted Burlington College. She was not honest about donor income when she filed bank loan reports.

She took a $200,000 "golden parachute" after ruining the finances of the college and she spent $500,000 of the school's funds for her daughter to teach woodworking.

A pretty stinky affair.

If a Republican acted in the same way Bernie Sanders would be howling.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
26. Prosecutors virtually never "clear" someone of "wrongdoing"
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 07:28 PM
Nov 2018

Point to some examples of that happening, as opposed to a decision to decline to prosecute.
 

Small-Axe

(359 posts)
27. Correct. So it is false to claim she was "cleared." She wasn't.
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 07:32 PM
Nov 2018

What Jane Sanders is reported to have done in misrepresenting donations is troubling.

Filing false loan applications is grounds for being charged with bank fraud.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
34. Hey...keep the hope alive, am I right? I'm totally sure that Jane and Weave are going to dredge
Wed Nov 14, 2018, 05:38 AM
Nov 2018

up a story out of what has hardly been mainstream news about not being indicted, only to find out in a week or month, what-have you, that Jane is infact being indicted. , and now she's a liar to boot. What would they gain from that exactly?


None of that is proof, because as the FBI has stated, it does not make public whether or not it has concluded or even is engaged in an investigation(although it has said that it informs the parties), but if you were a betting man, I'd be very interested in what odds you'd give the likelihood of an indictment coming down the pike at this point.

George II

(67,782 posts)
29. According to VTDigger, this may not be entirely the case:
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 10:03 PM
Nov 2018
https://vtdigger.org/2018/11/13/jane-sanders-says-federal-investigation-concluded-without-charges/

A spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Christina Nolan said he could not confirm or deny an investigation had even happened. Numerous trustees and others have reported being interviewed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“We don’t confirm or deny the existence of an investigation or that an investigation was in play. I don’t have any information for you,” said Kraig Laporte of the U.S. Attorney’s office in Burlington.

“I understand your concern,” Laporte said when asked about the credibility of the Weaver statement. “I can say we do communicate with represented parties, but I can’t comment relative to your inquiry.”

“We can’t control what people say,” Laporte said.

 

Small-Axe

(359 posts)
32. VT Digger is also a good source of information on the allegations made against Jane Sanders.
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 10:06 PM
Nov 2018

Local knowledge.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vermont's US Attorney cle...