Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,489 posts) Fri Nov 16, 2018, 03:03 PM Nov 2018

Apparently, in their day, the Scalia's "got busy"...

Link to tweet

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Apparently, in their day, the Scalia's "got busy"... (Original Post) brooklynite Nov 2018 OP

Apparently, unlike Trump, the Scalias really did not believe in abortion... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #1

What tactless, low-class, POS thing to say ... Berlusconi probably wouldn't even say something that mr_lebowski Nov 2018 #2

Maybe Trump doesn't know how babies are made? Farmer-Rick Nov 2018 #3

hlthe2b

(102,200 posts)

1. Apparently, unlike Trump, the Scalias really did not believe in abortion...

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2018, 03:05 PM

Nov 2018

and not surprisingly, birth control..

What a boor, Trump is.

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

2. What tactless, low-class, POS thing to say ... Berlusconi probably wouldn't even say something that

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2018, 03:12 PM

Nov 2018

fcuking tacky, at least not when acting in a official capacity at an ostensibly august and solemn event like the handing out of important government honors.

What a F****** CHILD we have in place of a real pResident.

Surprised he didn't ask if she's a 'go-er'? Knowhatimean?

Do you like PHOTOGRAPHY, Eh? CANDID PHOTOS? Grin grin snap snap nudge nudge wink-wink?

Farmer-Rick

(10,151 posts)

3. Maybe Trump doesn't know how babies are made?

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Fri Nov 16, 2018, 03:14 PM

Nov 2018

Because it only means they had sex 9 times before her menopause.

Reply to this discussion