Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 09:52 AM Nov 2018

All the details on the new Army uniform

A week after the Army secretary signed off on a new service uniform, final details are still being worked out as the service prepares to solicit a contract and begin fielding the throwback uniform next year.

The first groups to wear the uniform will be “forward-facing” soldiers like recruiters, Thomas said. And for next year, his team is working on getting 500 sets made for a June event, around the time of the D-Day anniversary and the Army birthday.

(The ‘new army’, under Trump?)



https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/11/19/brown-jump-boots-a-leather-bomber-jacket-more-all-the-details-on-the-new-army-greens/

The foldable garrison cap ― a version of which is worn by the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force ― will be the standard issue cover for the uniform. A circular service cap will be optional and worn according to commander guidance. The beret will also be authorized per individual commanders.

A long, trench-style green coat will be the standard issued outerwear.

There are three optional jackets: A “tanker” in the newly coined “heritage green” color, which is identical to the black jacket worn with Army Service Uniform class B’s: the wool “Ike jacket," a cropped green design; and a brown leather “bomber jacket,” with gathered knit cuffs and waistband, though with no shearling trim.

A pair of brown boots for airborne units to blouse their pants into are not a reality yet, but the intent is to show a design to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley soon, Dailey said.
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All the details on the new Army uniform (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Nov 2018 OP
They look like throwbacks to WWll. brush Nov 2018 #1
If you read the link, you'll see that's intentional. cwydro Nov 2018 #6
I think they look cool. Dave Starsky Nov 2018 #19
No t-shirts and flip -flops? marybourg Nov 2018 #33
This is true. I like them too. Tipperary Nov 2018 #35
Smoking lots of cigarettes was considered healthy then because they kept people thinner. Blue_true Nov 2018 #51
Cigarettes had a lot to do with it, of course. Dave Starsky Nov 2018 #57
You are a classicist when it comes to dress. Blue_true Nov 2018 #66
"the throwback uniform" left-of-center2012 Nov 2018 #7
Yup!! mitch96 Nov 2018 #20
Dang. A short 1940s style lapel, with a 70s roundish sewing style of wideness. TheBlackAdder Nov 2018 #23
Why do we need new uniforms? dhol82 Nov 2018 #2
The Trump army can't wear what the Obama army wore? left-of-center2012 Nov 2018 #8
Makes sense. dhol82 Nov 2018 #14
My first reaction... pangaia Nov 2018 #28
Sometimes the reasons are weird, but good. Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #37
just what we need onethatcares Nov 2018 #3
It is what the Army needs A DAY IN THE LIFE Nov 2018 #11
Why? I really have no idea. pangaia Nov 2018 #29
if the army needs uniforms to make it more onethatcares Nov 2018 #43
Ghost Army of WWII DeminPennswoods Nov 2018 #59
Who designed those? Ivanka? Autumn Nov 2018 #4
Draft-Dodging republican hustler "commander" drags America into the past Achilleaze Nov 2018 #5
Are those the space force uni's? Renew Deal Nov 2018 #12
Nope. They are for the Allied Terran Defense Achilleaze Nov 2018 #15
Those would be tough for the female members. dhol82 Nov 2018 #16
That's why they were those mini skirts on Star Trek Bucky Nov 2018 #22
Jumpsuits are a strategic nightmare if you... 3catwoman3 Nov 2018 #56
The redesign began well before Trump unc70 Nov 2018 #9
Definitely airborne troops TEB Nov 2018 #10
Will ESPN have to post Uniform Watch for the military? Renew Deal Nov 2018 #13
LOL DarthDem Nov 2018 #17
Now lets go back to some other WWII standards. Like firing a whole shit ton of generals brewens Nov 2018 #18
Thank you Bucky Nov 2018 #21
That was sold to us by Cheney as a way to actually save money and free up our troops brewens Nov 2018 #26
Yup dhol82 Nov 2018 #25
It's a jobs program for chefs I think. Generals get a private chef. n/t brewens Nov 2018 #27
Wait! Really? Private chef? dhol82 Nov 2018 #34
I wasn't joking. It's worse than that. brewens Nov 2018 #46
Holy Shit! dhol82 Nov 2018 #50
The problem is that we dont... Ferrets are Cool Nov 2018 #55
Couldn't agree more! DeminPennswoods Nov 2018 #60
Pinks and greens... Historic NY Nov 2018 #24
Good looking uniforms. Kaleva Nov 2018 #30
And a long red necktie. JohnnyRingo Nov 2018 #31
Looks like Russia miltary uniforms kimbutgar Nov 2018 #32
Close. dhol82 Nov 2018 #36
No, they don't obamanut2012 Nov 2018 #40
Some of these replies are ridiculous obamanut2012 Nov 2018 #38
This is something I've been hoping the Army would do since I got out in 1993. Aristus Nov 2018 #39
Not to derail your thread Takket Nov 2018 #41
Patton was ahead of his time! yortsed snacilbuper Nov 2018 #42
Space Force? Kaleva Nov 2018 #48
Where made? matt819 Nov 2018 #44
Uniforms used to be made in Philadelphia DeminPennswoods Nov 2018 #61
SHOCKED that tRump isn't making these in Confederate grey. BamaRefugee Nov 2018 #45
As I read this, I have Glenn Miller music in my head ! OnDoutside Nov 2018 #47
Not to be outdone, the Italian Army is also going retro. Kaleva Nov 2018 #49
Bwaaaaaahahahahahaha!!!! nt Ilsa Nov 2018 #52
Hope they don't decide to do the Greek version. dhol82 Nov 2018 #63
IMO, fugly. Totally Tunsie Nov 2018 #53
not brown, that's a bad pic Celerity Nov 2018 #64
The women's jacket is shorter. Ilsa Nov 2018 #54
Classy and sharp Jake Stern Nov 2018 #58
These are good looking uniforms DeminPennswoods Nov 2018 #62
Sounds pretty professional looking. WeekiWater Nov 2018 #65

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
19. I think they look cool.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 12:01 PM
Nov 2018

But I think people in general looked cooler in the 1940s. I look at old pictures from that time, and people all seem to be relatively fit, clean-cut, and put together. Much more so than now.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
35. This is true. I like them too.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:17 PM
Nov 2018

And the women’s has a real tie instead of that silly movie usher looking thing!

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
51. Smoking lots of cigarettes was considered healthy then because they kept people thinner.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 09:24 PM
Nov 2018

But take a close look at the eyes of the people in those pictures, the shadows, ruddy looking skin. I think people today who actually dress up and stay in shape are much more stylish and healthy looking.

But, I do like those Army uniforms.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
57. Cigarettes had a lot to do with it, of course.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 11:01 PM
Nov 2018

People weren't as health conscious, and exercise was nowhere near a science.

But damn, did those people look good, anyway.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
66. You are a classicist when it comes to dress.
Sat Nov 24, 2018, 02:00 PM
Nov 2018

The way mobsters used to dress during those days is an example. Most people back then dressed up to go to work, shopping, out to eat, ect. So they were dressed up more frequently that today's much more casual look. But I still think that fit people today look better and more stylish dressed up.

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
37. Sometimes the reasons are weird, but good.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:20 PM
Nov 2018

The reason they got away from the WWII uniforms in the first place is that so many of them were showing up in surplus stores that anybody could dress up like a soldier, and people masquerading as soldiers was becoming a problem. So: New uniforms, problem solved.

That may or may not be the problem now, and obviously you're never going to eliminate it, but as long as they have to buy new uniforms every so often anyway, they may as well re-design it occasionally and try to present a uniform a soldier can take pride in wearing due to a decent appearance.

onethatcares

(16,163 posts)
3. just what we need
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 09:58 AM
Nov 2018

maybe they should go all Toga and helmets like the Roman soldiers.

Will they be made in Ivankas' sweatshops?

 
11. It is what the Army needs
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:33 AM
Nov 2018

First of all, this is not a Trump uniform, it has been in the planning stages since Obama.

And yes, we need to get the Army out these Air Force knock-off uniforms/band uniforms. And hopefully the blouse will not require all of the crap the current one does.

onethatcares

(16,163 posts)
43. if the army needs uniforms to make it more
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:38 PM
Nov 2018

victorious in fighting our enemies (seems like a lot of them lately), we could stuff the uniforms with straw and place them on fields and mountains, toss em out of helicopters, put em in tanks.

We'd save a bundle on pay and benefits.

I still like my idea of helmets and togas, or maybe tams and kilts.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
5. Draft-Dodging republican hustler "commander" drags America into the past
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:01 AM
Nov 2018

Did Pooty Poot make the republican draft-dodger do this to our troops?

The world needs some non-geriatric uniform ideas.

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
16. Those would be tough for the female members.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:50 AM
Nov 2018

I remember wearing jumpsuits. You essentially have to get naked just to pee.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
22. That's why they were those mini skirts on Star Trek
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 12:15 PM
Nov 2018

After 50 years, you finally solved that mystery

unc70

(6,109 posts)
9. The redesign began well before Trump
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:18 AM
Nov 2018

This effort has very little to do with Trump. Of course, he will try to make it all about himself.

Renew Deal

(81,847 posts)
13. Will ESPN have to post Uniform Watch for the military?
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:39 AM
Nov 2018

“Soldiers are wearing throwbacks in Afghanistan today, and in Korea they are wearing the baby blue alternate uniform.”

DarthDem

(5,255 posts)
17. LOL
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:55 AM
Nov 2018

Good one!

In all seriousness though I didn't think anything was wrong with the Army's last uniforms and I thought the current ones were ill-conceived. These look much better.

brewens

(13,539 posts)
18. Now lets go back to some other WWII standards. Like firing a whole shit ton of generals
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 11:10 AM
Nov 2018

and other high ranking officers that we can't possibly really need. During WWII, we had something like one general for every 6000 active troops. Now it's one for every 1400.

The army also ran it's own mess halls and supply convoys during WWII just fine. The private contractors handling the food and driving the trucks are really just looting us.

brewens

(13,539 posts)
26. That was sold to us by Cheney as a way to actually save money and free up our troops
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 12:58 PM
Nov 2018

for more important missions. The half-wits don't realize how it really works.

Blackwater or whatever they call it now and the others do not give us a good deal. They lure away our military guys with big bucks. If they are overseas, the pay for their housing and meals and all that, just like we do our active service guys. Then they tack on enough to turn a nice profit. Then we have to pay to train new guys to replace the ones they hired away from us.

I know the marines could still be doing a fine job guarding our embassies.

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
25. Yup
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 12:58 PM
Nov 2018

No need to privatize all this shit. Only benefits the war profiteers.
Did not know about the general/troops ratio. Why do we have so many Generals?

Ferrets are Cool

(21,104 posts)
55. The problem is that we dont...
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 10:20 PM
Nov 2018

this country loves it's military like it loves it's guns. If you DARE say a negative word about the military you are scorned or worse. I hate "almost" everything about it.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
24. Pinks and greens...
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 12:34 PM
Nov 2018

throwback uniforms. I think they look much better than the crappy camo. Uniform of the Greatest Generation.

Somewhere in the recess of army supply there is probably a warehouse full of the stuff.

obamanut2012

(26,047 posts)
38. Some of these replies are ridiculous
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:23 PM
Nov 2018

These uniforms have been planned way before Trump, and unlike many on this board, I have active-duty friends and relatives in the Ar,y, both officers and NCOs, across many MOSCs, men and women, and they LOVE these. The ones who are in specialty units are expected to continue to wear their berets (Airborne, etc.).

They are sharp, and no longer look like Air Force castoffs.

Aristus

(66,294 posts)
39. This is something I've been hoping the Army would do since I got out in 1993.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:23 PM
Nov 2018

When I was in, we had the old pickle-green 'business suit' Class A uniform that had been around in one form or another since the 1950's. I hated it.

The old 'pinks and greens' uniform is stylish and looks much more military than the green uniform. There was a deliberate move in the 1960's to equate being a military officer to being a company executive, and that training for the one was suitable experience for the other. That when an officer left the service, he could have an important job waiting for him in corporate America. And it seemed to be reflected in the look of the officer's uniform back then.

I think the throwback uniforms are wonderful. Very classy.

Takket

(21,529 posts)
41. Not to derail your thread
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:24 PM
Nov 2018

But I laughed when I clicked on it because of the ad that popped up. I thought these were the new uniforms. Looking good military!!! Lol

<a href="https://ibb.co/gaPG5V"><img src="" alt="65073-E1-A-1441-4988-9712-B17-EFCEF80-FE" border="0"></a><br /><a target='_blank' href='https://statewideinventory.org/used-cars'>statewide auto sales sun valley</a><br />

matt819

(10,749 posts)
44. Where made?
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 01:40 PM
Nov 2018

Quick Google search shows that in 2012 it was revealed that uniforms were made in China. Whoops.

In that same quick search, I found that American Apparel has made US military uniforms since 1987. Website notes that uniforms are made in three facilities in Alabama. The website doesn't say whether they operate any other facilities.

Also, I'm not sure that this is the same American Apparel that was sold last year to (I think) a Canadian company.

So, as always with this regime and with government contracts generally - follow the money.

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
63. Hope they don't decide to do the Greek version.
Sat Nov 24, 2018, 10:11 AM
Nov 2018

&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwhyathens.com%2Fevzones-uniform-greek-soldier%2F&tbnid=-2pjGKJJZs9d9M&vet=1&docid=c1OPrRUvZ2qPuM&w=780&h=1024&client=safari&ved=2ahUKEwj4kIPRmu3eAhWBPd8KHeNUBKwQMygDegUIARDzAQ


Totally Tunsie

(10,885 posts)
53. IMO, fugly.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 09:44 PM
Nov 2018

Don't care who designed them, who ordered them and for whom/by whom. Can't we do better than diarrhea brown?

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
54. The women's jacket is shorter.
Fri Nov 23, 2018, 09:47 PM
Nov 2018

Probably looks more proportionate on average size women, but taller women and bustier women should have an option for a jacket styled more like the men's in length or in length to the waist.

 

WeekiWater

(3,259 posts)
65. Sounds pretty professional looking.
Sat Nov 24, 2018, 10:56 AM
Nov 2018

The photos aren’t of the final version.

Ten years sounds like a long time to phase out the old uniforms. Is this standard? Sounds like all of those in BT will be issued the new ones but those already serving will have until 2028 to “upgrade”. Of course they can get the new ones sooner.

I imagine a lot goes into getting the uniform ready for those in BT but measuring them right off the bat sounds like a bad idea. Maybe it’s a necessity for logistical reasons. $400+ dollars per adds up pretty quick. I don’t know the stats but I imagine a good number of people phase out. Second, BT drastically changes the body of many and they will have to be tailored a second time before even being worn once. That is from the article. I would think there would be a more efficient way to do it. I get it if it’s simply a logistical impossibility.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All the details on the ne...