Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amount of space required to transport the same number of passengers by car, bus or bicycle. (Original Post) marmar Aug 2012 OP
Now I know where the Munster family hails from! rfranklin Aug 2012 #1
Is there a point to this? Are we running out of space? 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #2
Efficiency of different modes of transport is the point. I didn't think it was that obtuse a concept marmar Aug 2012 #3
Nice, sunny days are also efficient but not always dependable. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #6
"we can neither anticipate nor dictate every circumstance of every person's life" marmar Aug 2012 #8
Unless the information presented is for the sake of idle trivia Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #9
It seems that some people just like to argue. marmar Aug 2012 #11
I'm not arguing but now I am genuinely curious. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #13
What is it about using less space that is more efficient? 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #7
Road space costs money and takes energy to create and maintain.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #10
We should definitely be Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #14
No breeding necessary, ride a bike and lose weight.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #15
You obviously haven't Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #17
What is he peddling? Fumesucker Aug 2012 #18
yes, actually Enrique Aug 2012 #4
How about the speed at which they move, is that a function of efficiency? 1-Old-Man Aug 2012 #21
Fine. 99Forever Aug 2012 #5
Heh.. I have neighbors that get in their car to go 100 yards to the mailbox.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #12
Do you have a government? Petition it. Government services are Luminous Animal Aug 2012 #16
Oh yeah.. 99Forever Aug 2012 #23
That's the spirit! Give up before you started... Luminous Animal Aug 2012 #24
Sorry, friend... 99Forever Aug 2012 #25
why not put 50 buses loaded with one person. ileus Aug 2012 #19
I Agree With the Concept -- On the Road Aug 2012 #20
US Solution: ban roads. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #22
The vitriol incited by this simple and obvious observation is saying something quite interesting Egalitarian Thug Aug 2012 #26
Seems to be three different "zoom" levels. Trillo Aug 2012 #27
here's the deal datasuspect Aug 2012 #28
Very useful info for those times when everyone is going to the same place Dreamer Tatum Aug 2012 #29
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
1. Now I know where the Munster family hails from!
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:31 AM
Aug 2012

This is exciting! And now we have Eddie running for VP!

marmar

(77,067 posts)
3. Efficiency of different modes of transport is the point. I didn't think it was that obtuse a concept
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:33 AM
Aug 2012

nt

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
6. Nice, sunny days are also efficient but not always dependable.
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:47 AM
Aug 2012

And then there are those who live in the country but work in the city. Actually, there are probably more variables than that but they elude me; which is probably the most important point of all -- we can neither anticipate nor dictate every circumstance of every person's life.

marmar

(77,067 posts)
8. "we can neither anticipate nor dictate every circumstance of every person's life"
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:51 AM
Aug 2012

Presenting information is trying to dictate every circumstance of every person's life?


Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
9. Unless the information presented is for the sake of idle trivia
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:53 AM
Aug 2012

it seems the intent is to say "This over that." Is there any intent of passing laws or regulations based on this information or using public assets?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
13. I'm not arguing but now I am genuinely curious.
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:59 AM
Aug 2012

What was the point of the OP if not the entire project of staging, shooting and publishing that poster?

Is there any intent to pass laws or spend public funds or was it simply some bemusing but idle trivia?

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
7. What is it about using less space that is more efficient?
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:48 AM
Aug 2012

I can see how using less fuel would be more efficient but I can't see how using less space is.

On Edit: Consider this, efficieny in performing a task is measured by the amount of consumable resource required to accomplish the task. Space is not consumed in the process of moving people.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
10. Road space costs money and takes energy to create and maintain..
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:55 AM
Aug 2012

Plus roadway damage increases roughly as the fourth power of vehicle weight so a vehicle that weighs twice as much does 2^4 power or 16 times as much and a vehicle that weighs 10 times as much causes 10^4 times or 10,000 times the damage per mile traveled.

Bicycle + rider = ~200 lbs while a very light car would be ~2000 lbs..


Enrique

(27,461 posts)
4. yes, actually
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:37 AM
Aug 2012

roads are being widened all the time, which is very costly. Also accidents occur all the time, that's how a lot of people die, that is a function of lack of space.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
21. How about the speed at which they move, is that a function of efficiency?
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:52 AM
Aug 2012

I ask because as I recall the British determined that for every foot you widen a road people will travel 10 mph faster on it. Time, as opposed to space, is a consumable resource.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
5. Fine.
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 09:43 AM
Aug 2012

Let me know when they start running buses closer than twenty miles from our home and design a bicycle that can travel through a foot + of snow and -20 degrees into a 40 mph wind.


Mmmmk?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
16. Do you have a government? Petition it. Government services are
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:19 AM
Aug 2012

often the result of active involvement of those who would benefit from those services.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
23. Oh yeah..
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:31 AM
Aug 2012

.. that'll get it done.

BTW, the bus service that does exist here, is getting cut back, NOT expanded. You know, "austerity and all that."


Any more suggestions? (Like some that have a chance in hell of succeeding?)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
24. That's the spirit! Give up before you started...
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 11:44 AM
Aug 2012

It took activists more than 20 years to transform the bicycle infrastructure in San Francisco and we are not quite there yet.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
25. Sorry, friend...
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 01:43 PM
Aug 2012

... but some of us have more immediate and important problems on our plates. But feel free to try and lay some more utopian guilt on me, it works so well.

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
20. I Agree With the Concept --
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 10:49 AM
Aug 2012

If the drivers and passengers in all those cars had the same origin and destination, it would be much more efficient for them to take the bus.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
26. The vitriol incited by this simple and obvious observation is saying something quite interesting
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 01:57 PM
Aug 2012

about a few of the people here.

"Extremism in the name of authority and the status quo is no vice". - anonymous Democrat(?)

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
27. Seems to be three different "zoom" levels.
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 02:09 PM
Aug 2012

The middle picture with the bus appears most zoomed out, with more roofs (reddish) visible. The right picture is zoomed in, less of the roofs are visible. The left picture of the cars, is zoomed in the most, with very little roof area visible.

This is also confirmed by the size of the people and the widths of the road.

 

datasuspect

(26,591 posts)
28. here's the deal
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 02:09 PM
Aug 2012

Uhhhmerica is very large country.

i know tv likes to film in LA, Chicago, Toronto, and NYC, but this doesn't mean that we all live in a dense, urban area.

Uhhhhmerica is a mostly rural, spread out country.

Now, when you're out in the country, suburbs, or exburbs (save your opinion - these places exist and people live there) you have to drive significant distances to get places.

when you factor in that all of us aren't students, trustafarians, or urban "funemployed" artistic types, PLUS some of us have jobs where we have to dress like grown ups and transact business with other grown ups . . . you see where I'm going? yeah - you could ride a bike 20 miles to get to a business meeting, but the other business people might not react well to your sweat soaked self or your odor.

it would be nice if they brought interurbans or a rail system back, but it probably won't happen until we run out of fossil fuels.

but bicycles as the answer to all the world's ills is simply childish.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
29. Very useful info for those times when everyone is going to the same place
Fri Aug 17, 2012, 02:10 PM
Aug 2012

at the same time, carrying nothing, in good weather conditions, with plans that won't change, and no
specific preferences for privacy or comfort.

ie, never.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amount of space required ...