General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo the Madman is retweeting right-wing pipsqueak/twit Charlie Kirk today re: "Cultural Marxism"
Now I admit I haven't read up on exactly what "Cultural Marxism" is meant to denote but reading between the lines I can gather it is:
1. An attempt to scare people by applying the word "Marxism"
2. A not so thinly veiled White Supremacist dog whistle intended to scare people about "White Genocide"
Am I pretty much correct on this assessment?
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)ck4829
(35,068 posts)That alone should tell you all you need to know
11cents
(1,777 posts)And I don't mean neo-Nazi. I mean that the propagandists of the German NSDAP used this term. So in origin, and still today, the fundamental implications are antisemitic -- as is the whole "White Genocide" notion, since the premise is that Jews are planning to "replace" whites with non-whites.
Thyla
(791 posts)And I'm fairly certain that those that use it have no idea either but it makes them sound all book learned and important.
Basically Gay frogs because..... liberals
edit, beaten to it.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Always followed by sneering circular arguments, projections, straw men, ad hominems (LOTS of those), and all that.
I think Social Darwinism is more like what theyre actually espousing. As in, No social safety nets, and fuck you if you need one. (Unless its for ME).