Romney's Cat or Schroedinger's Tax Returns
http://open.salon.com/blog/naithom/2012/08/17/naithom_addendum_romneys_cat_or_schroedingers_tax_returns
We have been very transparent to what's legally required of us,",
"there's nothing we're hiding",
"There's going to be no more tax releases given." ,
unveiling a more extensive record of their tax history would "only give [Democrats] more ammunition"
"It's been managed by a blind trust since before Mitt was governor, you know, 2002 forward," - comments made during one interview Ann Romney 2012 where she forgets her husbands comments in 1994
What do these statements tell us? That Mitt and Ann are hiding plenty and have known for some time that there are things that have been done that wouldnt pass the sniff test with the public. And that they are apparently under the impression that, if they act haughty, insult those who are questioning them and attempt to deflect the issue to something else, this will all go away.
Since that has never worked before in politics, one has to wonder if this attitude comes from arrogance or sheer stupidity.
So I now propose a political science addendum to the Schroedingers cat experiment, the Naithom Addendum, as it were that the condition of the hidden object can be best ascertained by the reaction of those in closest proximity to the hidden object.
https://pmatep5f7b.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/ProdStage