Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 12:13 PM Dec 2018

Trump *repeatedly* asked Barr if he'd recuse himself from Russia probe. What answer did he give...

Last edited Fri Dec 7, 2018, 12:51 PM - Edit history (1)

... given that Trump did ultimately choose him? Hmmmmmmm?!? I think we all know the answer without hearing from Barr or Trump. There can be only one.

Corruption, pure and simple, on both sides. Asking a question one should not ask, seeking one and only one specific answer; giving the specific answer sought in order to secure the position. Dirty, dirty, dirty. By this alone Barr is revealed to be dishonorable and unworthy of the office (let's be honest, that's a criteria for the hire by Trump, but let's not give Barr a pass on that stain just because he's supposedly qualified or has been AG before).

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump *repeatedly* asked Barr if he'd recuse himself from Russia probe. What answer did he give... (Original Post) RockRaven Dec 2018 OP
Then all the Democratic Senators need to ask, in public and under oath, being seen by US Citizens irisblue Dec 2018 #1
Beasty confirmation hearing roscoeroscoe Dec 2018 #3
Not only should they ask him if he will recuse himself... Salviati Dec 2018 #15
FFS, he's an attorney and a former AG! Danascot Dec 2018 #2
I would guess that there are some other hidden calculations going on. erronis Dec 2018 #13
what do you mean, there appear to be a lot of senile republicons younger than that certainot Dec 2018 #19
He must be very stupid kacekwl Dec 2018 #4
It's going to be an interesting confirmation hearing. And Lindsay Graham is going to lead it. George II Dec 2018 #5
Anything with Lindsay just seems like a pas-de-deux (trois/quatre/etc.) erronis Dec 2018 #6
Chuck Grassley's little toad Lindsay saidsimplesimon Dec 2018 #11
"He'd be an outstanding choice. I think he could get confirmed very easily." dalton99a Dec 2018 #10
I think at this point anyone trump nominates will be confirmed, but I want to see him grilled.... George II Dec 2018 #12
In and of itself, obstruction of justice. The huge elephant in the room. Where' is Paul Ryan? ffr Dec 2018 #7
Paul who? Probably just a covfefe boy. erronis Dec 2018 #14
We factually we do not know what response he gave to Shitler. Texin Dec 2018 #8
I heard it was a toss-up . . either William Barr or Roseanne Barr. . . . pdsimdars Dec 2018 #9
Must be desperate for money to accept employment in this administration. nt NCjack Dec 2018 #16
Rachel said he was the one who orchestrated all of the pardons Power 2 the People Dec 2018 #17
Interesting scenario. Tommy_Carcetti Dec 2018 #18
Why would he recuse himself, to begin with? Honeycombe8 Dec 2018 #20
Yep Barr had no reason to recuse himself FakeNoose Dec 2018 #21
It's not illegal to ask if he'd have to recuse himself in a key investigation.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2018 #22
WHOA - CNN analyst Natasha Bertrand just dropped a bombshell revelation re: Barr onetexan Dec 2018 #23

roscoeroscoe

(1,369 posts)
3. Beasty confirmation hearing
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:20 PM
Dec 2018

No question, this will not be over soon, and you will not enjoy it... Mr. Barr...

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
15. Not only should they ask him if he will recuse himself...
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:32 PM
Dec 2018

... but they should ask him whether trump asked him anything about his thoughts on the investigation, and whether he would recuse himself.

Danascot

(4,690 posts)
2. FFS, he's an attorney and a former AG!
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:14 PM
Dec 2018

It's hard to believe he's so stupid that he doesn't seem to know that working for trump is a very bad idea. He's only 68 so he doesn't even have the excuse of being senile.

erronis

(15,224 posts)
13. I would guess that there are some other hidden calculations going on.
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:28 PM
Dec 2018

It's not all about filling executive-level positions. Probably more about getting some key people in critical points where the whole f'in thing can be blown up (democracy/us.government).

erronis

(15,224 posts)
6. Anything with Lindsay just seems like a pas-de-deux (trois/quatre/etc.)
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:51 PM
Dec 2018

You just never know where sweet Lindsay will go next. Left/right, up/down, smiley/saddy.

If I had sweet Lindsay as someone representing me, I'd be constantly trying to clean up after him.

Nice old boy, however.

Not my type.

dalton99a

(81,433 posts)
10. "He'd be an outstanding choice. I think he could get confirmed very easily."
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:59 PM
Dec 2018
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who is in line to lead the Judiciary Committee next year and oversee Barr’s confirmation, said he would be a good choice.

“He’d be an outstanding choice,” Graham said last week. “I think he could get confirmed very easily.”

George II

(67,782 posts)
12. I think at this point anyone trump nominates will be confirmed, but I want to see him grilled....
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:23 PM
Dec 2018

....about all the ongoing issues, not the least Mueller's investigation.

Texin

(2,594 posts)
8. We factually we do not know what response he gave to Shitler.
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:57 PM
Dec 2018

I'm not going to believe that an attorney (a real, experienced one at least) would have just told him, "Mr. President*, I won't recuse myself." I would just bet that he said something to the effect that "I'll do the 'right thing'." And, of course, Shitler being the stable genius* that he purports himself to be would simply infer from that response that, of course, he's going to recuse himself. I'm, fairly certain Sessions said something like that to him, but more likely Shitler never asked him that before he appointed him, and since the orange blowhard always assumes everyone else is going to do what Donald would do in every case, he got a shock when Sessions did that. People around Shitler are constantly fluffing him 24/7 and working around him simultaneously, but the ranks are thinning rapidly.

Power 2 the People

(2,437 posts)
17. Rachel said he was the one who orchestrated all of the pardons
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:44 PM
Dec 2018

in the Iran-Contra scandal. All of the Republican criminals who committed treason against the United States were pardoned by Poppy Bush under the guidance of Barr. I wonder why Drumpf is choosing him?????????????

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,172 posts)
18. Interesting scenario.
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:46 PM
Dec 2018

Barr probably would have sailed through with no issues of recusal (at least that I'm not aware of) if Trump had kept his mouth shut.

But by asking him directly about the Mueller campaign, it's possible this is evidence of obstruction on Trump's part, making him a witness, and that potentially does raise issues of possible recusal.

Trump may have shot himself in his own foot because he's a moron.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
20. Why would he recuse himself, to begin with?
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 02:59 PM
Dec 2018

Sessions had to recuse himself because if he hadn't, he would have been by the Senate, because of his involvement with Russians when he was on the Trump campaign team.

Barr didn't work on the Trump campaign, did he? So he can honestly say he won't recuse himself, because there's nothing to recuse himself for.

I'd answer it by saying, "I have no reason to recuse myself, since I had no dealings with the Russians or your campaign or your team, so no, I wouldn't recuse myself. I'll make sure from here on out that there's no reason to recuse myself, so I can assure you, I will not be recusing myself."

Trump still doesn't understand why Sessions HAD to recuse himself. He hadn't foreseen it, just like Trump, Trump's team, Trump's lawyers...no one foresaw that Sessions would have to recuse himself.

FakeNoose

(32,626 posts)
21. Yep Barr had no reason to recuse himself
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 03:07 PM
Dec 2018

Except that now Cheeto has made it a requirement for the job. So you can bet it was discussed privately before Barr got hired. Like the previous poster said, Cheeto has shot himself in the foot because he's an idiot. Barr can't be too smart either, leaving a good job at a top law firm ... for THIS?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
22. It's not illegal to ask if he'd have to recuse himself in a key investigation....
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 03:11 PM
Dec 2018

that would be overseen by the AG. I think it's a normal question.

"As you know, the AG is the oversight of a V.I.P. investigation in the country. I need someone who will not recuse himself from that responsibility, or have any reason to recuse himself."

Normally, it's a big honor, and helps someone's career tremendously, to work in the cabinet or administration. But THIS administration at THIS time...I don't see why Barr would do it. Unless there's a bribe involved.

onetexan

(13,036 posts)
23. WHOA - CNN analyst Natasha Bertrand just dropped a bombshell revelation re: Barr
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 11:24 AM
Dec 2018

The host standing in for Joy Reid in AMJoy asked why such a guy with good record of being AG would want to step into this "house of horrors". Ms. Bertrand mentioned last year Barr had actually SOLICITED TO BE ON TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM!! .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump *repeatedly* asked ...