Could the new house pass a referral to the senate for

[bluestarone]

Senate thoughts on impeachment? Putting the senate on record without fully going for impeachment UNLESS of pre- support from the senate? Would this be wrong way to proceed?

[StTimofEdenRoc]

1. I believe Nancy Pelosi is headed the right way, expose the truth, let the public lead.

Considering I was upset with her not impeaching Bush, this is a big leap of faith for me.

[bluestarone]

2. I also have great faith in her and fellow DEMS.

Let the investigation begin for sure!!

[MineralMan]

3. Why would the House do that?

The House impeaches. The Senate judges. There is no reason to consult the Senate until an investigation and a vote on impeachment takes place. The Senate has nothing to say about either of those things.

There is a procedure. That procedure should be followed. The House does not have to ask the Senate what it thinks about impeachment, so it should not do so.

[bluestarone]

4. That makes sense

Just wanting to get the REPUBS on record as to use it against them later was my thought.

[MineralMan]

5. Their position is already know, frankly.

Leave them out of it until they have work to do. That's what I'd do. Screw 'em, I say.

[brooklynite]

6. The House can do anything it wants. The Senate won't take action on it...

If your argument is that this will make Republicans Senator look bad, I don't think it'll work.

[bluestarone]

7. That is what i was thinking. (making them look bad)

Just want them (REPUBS) to pay i guess!!

[Pope George Ringo II]

8. You can't ask them to take it up until they do

But I'm all in favor of a House Resolution crapping all over Trump for his crimes, and calling out the Senate for covering them up.

[bluestarone]

9. That works for me too!!