General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPete Stark defends Social Security payments to his kids.
The campaign of Rep. Pete Stark, the East Bay Democrat in a contested re-election race against fellow Democrat Eric Swalwell of Dublin, confirmed to the Chronicle that Starks children do receive Social Security benefits as allowed under the law, and that he has stopped paying his dues to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Stark campaign consultant Michael Terris wrote in an email that Stark fought his entire career to protect Social Security from those who would dismantle it. Congressman Stark has been paying into the system for many years. And yes, like all Americans, he and his family intend to collect the benefits to which they are eligible.
Stark, 80, earned his M.B.A. at UC Berkeley in 1960 and went on to make a fortune early in his career starting a successful bank in Walnut Creek. Starks net worth is estimated as high as $27 million and is ranked as the 74th wealthiest member of Congress.
According to the Social Security Administration, 4.4 million children receive approximately $2.5 billion each month because one or both of their parents are disabled, retired or deceased. Those dollars help to provide the necessities of life for family members and help to make it possible for those children to complete high school. When a parent becomes disabled or dies, Social Security benefits help to stabilize the familys financial future.
http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/08/17/pete-stark-defends-social-security-payments-to-his-kids-delinquent-dues/
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)marybourg
(12,620 posts)and since he's 80, he needs to collect or he'd lose money, but children do need to be under 18 to collect from a deceased parent's account. Used to be older if child was a full time student, but that was eliminated.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)There's a family photo at the link.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)or disabled.
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10085.html#a0=2
Though I collected from age 20 to 22, and I wasn't a student, or disabled, but that was almost 20 years ago.
marybourg
(12,620 posts)secondary student, not a college student any longer. See your citation.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)in your post, nothing about college - so I stand by my post.
senseandsensibility
(17,000 posts)I love him.
RandySF
(58,768 posts)A long tenure in office often gives one the idea that they did in the past excuses what they do in the present.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)because I was thinking the same thing - if they're eligible, why shouldn't they collect?
dsc
(52,155 posts)I am adamantly opposed to means testing SS and Medicare.
cali
(114,904 posts)his kids are entitled to Social Security payments.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)in that sense that he applied for Social Security benefits at some time in the past. He reached full retirement age at age 65. He has three minor children. Because their father is retired, they are eligible to receive benefits.
dsc
(52,155 posts)than the children are entitled.
bluedeminredstate
(3,322 posts)When my husband began collecting his SS two years ago our son was a junior in high school. He received a check for half the benefits my husband received each month until he finished high school. As soon as he graduated the benefits stopped. Our daughter who was in college at the time didn't receive anything.