General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums538: Trump Is Only Popular In Rural Areas
The 2018 midterm election confirmed Americas urban-rural divide; Democrats excelled in cities, Republicans dominated in the country and the suburbs were the tiebreaker that handed Democrats the House. Will the 2020 election play out the same way? This week, we got two polls of President Trumps approval rating that suggest it might.
First, a Selzer & Co. (one of our favorite pollsters) national poll conducted Nov. 24-27 for Grinnell College found that Trump had a 43 percent approval rating and a 45 percent disapproval rating among all adults. However, his support isnt distributed equally across different types of communities. Hes enormously popular among residents of rural areas, with a 61 percent approval rating and a 26 percent disapproval rating. In small towns, that breakdown is 44 percent approve vs. 42 percent disapprove. But in suburban areas, only 41 percent of residents approve of the job that Trump is doing as president, while 50 percent disapprove. Trumps approval rating is lowest among urbanites 31 percent approve of him while 59 percent disapprove.
We saw similar geographic trends in an Investors Business Daily/TIPP poll that was conducted from Nov. 26 to Dec. 2. Trump again got the highest marks from residents of rural areas a 62 percent approval rating and a 35 percent disapproval rating. And yet again, his standing took a nosedive among suburbanites and urbanites. In suburban areas, Trumps approval rating was 32 percent, and his disapproval rating was 60 percent. In urban areas, his approval rating was 27 percent, and his disapproval rating was 67 percent. (The IBD/TIPP poll didnt include small town as an option for respondents.) Overall, Trumps approval/disapproval spread was much lower in the IBD/TIPP poll (39 percent approve, 55 percent disapprove) than it was in the Selzer poll, which explains why the IBD/TIPP poll is worse for Trump in all three geographic categories as well.
Here are the results of the polls side by side:
-more-
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-is-really-popular-in-rural-areas-other-places-not-so-much/
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Grasswire2
(13,569 posts)Really.
Nothing that we see and hear daily enters their perception.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... are running from it like roaches from Raid on mixed aisle forums.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)... colored man he won't notice you picking his pockets."
-LBJ
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)The concentration of liberals also makes it easier for Republicans to gerrymander effectively.
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)We need some of those millions being thrown at progressive candidates to be put behind buying ads and programming in those Rush-bot areas.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)WE NEED ALOT OF HELP.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)The Dems need to reach out to the rural areas, and show them that it's not all about racism.
Our Party needs to counter the hate-radio message with real facts and real programs to help THEM. If we did that it would make all the difference, because it's more than the Repukes are doing now. There's so much confusion and misinformation thanks to Faux News and Rush Limbaugh.
For example the rural low-information folks hate Obamacare, but they want the ACA. They hate welfare, but they depend on their monthly disability checks. They depend on migrant farm workers at harvest-time, but they want to build "the wall." A little outreach would go along way for these people.
Liberty Belle
(9,534 posts)Many rural residents do not have access to a daily newspaper or most local TV stations.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)Maybe someday we can change that.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)in your observation. Couple of things to consider in Rural Polling. First,use of landlines and the selected Demographics used or not used. Secondly,which Voter Segment did they use.
Something about the polling in the last 2-3 years seems odd . Who and what is their methodology,caught something during the last election cycle,they were using voter lists from 2012 and 2014 of persons who voted only,and by party registration and not a mix of Parties.
lostnfound
(16,177 posts)Wont solve the problem.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,331 posts)House of Roberts
(5,168 posts).
Initech
(100,068 posts)Went overwhelmingly for Trump in 2016 and we're a major metropolitan area. Lots of Fox bots and MAGAts here.
TheBlackAdder
(28,188 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)This county went ultra hard right in the last few years. We've always been a major GOP stronghold (hell, I see the Nixon library driving to work every day) and I've never really understood it because we are California. Thankfully we've been seeing a turn around especially in this election with every district flipping blue.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)lots of banks and insurance co's with scads of money. Concentrated in Newport Beach and Irvine around the airport.
Was good to see this cycle how they came around to being blue.