General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOnce the courts are done with Michael Cohen, will he shop around a film treatment or screenplay?
He's going to have to come up with a new way to make money.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)"It's time to write your book now".
PJMcK
(21,998 posts)Played by the great John Larroquette! I always wished he had been in a few more episodes. I love the scene where he bursts into the Oval Office carrying a cricket bat and rants to President Bartlet without realizing there are a couple of dozen spectators in the room!
On the other hand, Oliver Platt was great as Oliver Babish.
I loved that series so much that my fiancee calls it my fairytale.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)she only really discovered it about 2 years ago but has been burning through the episodes so much on Netflix that I have seen most of them again a few times too.
And now we watch Mom just to see Allison Janney.
I mean, it wasn't _that_ long ago that her favorite show was Dragonball Z.
I like where she is headed.
Zoonart
(11,833 posts)I find Mike Flynn's story more compelling..especially if he wore a wire. It tracks with that of Benedict Arnold , who... angry at Washington, flips to the enemy and commits treason. Flynn, angry at being fired by Obama and, by extension Hillary, flips to the dark side. More interesting back story, personal anguish, and fall from grace.
Cohen has been mobbed-up his entire adult life.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Especially since he broke the law for 45 and then had to suffer the public humiliation of getting fired by him for the bogus reason that he lied to Pence. It was as if Pence's moral standing was being held above Flynn's. Flynn's ultimate revenge is against Pence's self-righteous smirk.
In It to Win It
(8,225 posts)Jarqui
(10,122 posts)MineralMan
(146,256 posts)I certainly wouldn't. We're seeing it all unfold before our eyes in real life. Why pay to watch a movie?
Siwsan
(26,250 posts)I could see an HBO or Showtime movie/documentary happening.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Word in NY is that he's banked around $80 million. That fine was peanuts and should have been MUCH higher.
rurallib
(62,382 posts)on his own coming up very soon. So, yeah, why not write a book?
csziggy
(34,131 posts)So that murderers and other criminals can't write tell-all books and make a fortune?
Siwsan
(26,250 posts)And, regardless, it probably wouldn't stop someone in his family from 'presenting' the screenplay or treatment.
brooklynite
(94,358 posts)...that says you cant profit from criminal conduct.
Siwsan
(26,250 posts)But I have no doubt there are ways around it.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)In 1987, lawyers for publishing company Simon & Schuster sued the New York authorities to prevent enforcement of the Son of Sam law with respect to a book they were about to publish called Wiseguy, written by Nicholas Pileggi. The book was about ex-mobster Henry Hill and was used as the basis for the film Goodfellas. The case reached the federal Supreme Court in 1991. In an 80 ruling on Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, the court ruled the law unconstitutional.[1] The majority opinion was that the law was overinclusive, and would have prevented the publication of such works as The Autobiography of Malcolm X, Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, and even The Confessions of Saint Augustine.[2]
Similarly, the state of California's Son of Sam law was struck down in 2002 after being used against Barry Keenan, one of the men who kidnapped Frank Sinatra, Jr. in 1963.
After numerous revisions, New York adopted a new "Son of Sam" law in 2001.[3] This law requires that victims of crimes be notified whenever a person convicted of a crime receives $10,000 (US) or morefrom virtually any source.[4] The law then attaches a springing statute of limitations, giving victims an extended period of time to sue the perpetrator of the crime in civil court for their crimes.[5] This law also authorizes a state agency, the Crime Victims' Board, to act on the victims' behalf in some limited circumstances.[6] Thus far, the current New York law has survived court scrutiny.
In certain cases, a Son of Sam law can be extended beyond the criminals themselves to include friends, neighbors, and family members of the lawbreaker who seek to profit by telling publishers and filmmakers of their relation to the criminal. In other cases, a person may not financially benefit from the sale of a story or any other mementos pertaining to the crime.[citation needed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law#History_and_legal_status
It will be interesting to see how, and by who, the 'inner details' of this whole mishegoss are revealed.