General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBankers ready to sue if bonuses too small
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8987836/Bankers-ready-to-sue-if-bonuses-too-small.htmlBritish banks should brace themselves for claims from "disgruntled" bankers who will not roll over and accept lower bonuses than usual despite the huge public and shareholder backlash against out-of-control pay, legal experts have warned. One claim for £1.5m is understood to have already made its way into the system last year, after a banker believed their 2011 bonus was too low. The case is believed to have been rejected before it got to court, with lawyers acting for the bank branding the claim "whimsical".
Judges are also said to be unsympathetic towards bankers' claims that their bonuses are too small in the current climate. However, City lawyers said an increasing number of bankers were building cases in preparation of lower bonus payouts and were prepared to fight it out at court.
Richard Fox, employment partner at law firm Kingsley Napley, said: "We're seeing an increase in bankers seeking advice on their options. There are people [who will be] disgruntled they are getting less bonuses so why wouldn't they? "Particularly if their team is doing well, or the UK is doing as well as it could despite the bank doing badly in other departments like the Swiss or French arm." He said he had held discussions with bankers in recent weeks over the "wriggle room" in their contracts which could be exploited.
Bankers who did not "trust" the reward they received could work out what they thought they should have got based on a calculation of the bank's profits and their share in the type of bonus pool available, he said. "These are the areas in which we hope to achieve something," Mr Fox said, adding bankers "are not the sort of people that don't consider their options".
snip
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)BR_Parkway
(8,666 posts)merkozy
(9 posts)Sue for bonuses? What idiot does that? Even shareholders, the owners of the company, do not sue for dividends. If they're not happy with the rewards, they take their money elsewhere. Isn't that what a free market is supposed to be, if such a thing ever exist? But not for the first time delusional bankers demonstrate they have completely lost touch with reality. No wonder people are asking, Just who the hell are these people? Where do they come from? And what are they doing among us? To answer a few of these questions, let's consult the reliable Oxford English Dictionary on the definition of the words bonus and windfall.
Bonus: Gratuity given as gift, or compensation earned as reward upon achieving a goal or milestone, over and above what is usual or expected.
Windfall: A sudden, unexpected piece of good fortune or personal gain which is not a direct result of something that the recipient did.
From the above definition, it is clear that what bankers call a bonus is nothing of the sort. Indeed, not even the word windfall gives sufficient justice to bankers actions, considering that banks are and have for the past 4 years been heavily-dependent on taxpayer-sponsored intravenous tubes for both essential nutrition and critical medication.
http://www.maverickonomics.com/2011/11/30/the-market-acording-to-the-fundamentalists/
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Let's just say that Jesus went easy on the moneylenders.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)until it doesn't benefit them. So rather than accepting that public opinion is against them, which is what they claim keeps them in check, they sue to make sure they get everything they can.
These guys are crooks. I see none of them are threatening to quit - just threatening to sue.
TBF
(32,017 posts)it doesn't have anything to do with "public opinion".
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Make a lot of noise and whine a lot and kick your heals a lot and pout a lot so we can all watch you.