Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stockholmer

(3,751 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 05:51 AM Jan 2012

Bankers ready to sue if bonuses too small

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8987836/Bankers-ready-to-sue-if-bonuses-too-small.html


British banks should brace themselves for claims from "disgruntled" bankers who will not roll over and accept lower bonuses than usual despite the huge public and shareholder backlash against out-of-control pay, legal experts have warned. One claim for £1.5m is understood to have already made its way into the system last year, after a banker believed their 2011 bonus was too low. The case is believed to have been rejected before it got to court, with lawyers acting for the bank branding the claim "whimsical".

Judges are also said to be unsympathetic towards bankers' claims that their bonuses are too small in the current climate. However, City lawyers said an increasing number of bankers were building cases in preparation of lower bonus payouts and were prepared to fight it out at court.

Richard Fox, employment partner at law firm Kingsley Napley, said: "We're seeing an increase in bankers seeking advice on their options. There are people [who will be] disgruntled they are getting less bonuses so why wouldn't they? "Particularly if their team is doing well, or the UK is doing as well as it could despite the bank doing badly in other departments like the Swiss or French arm." He said he had held discussions with bankers in recent weeks over the "wriggle room" in their contracts which could be exploited.

Bankers who did not "trust" the reward they received could work out what they thought they should have got based on a calculation of the bank's profits and their share in the type of bonus pool available, he said. "These are the areas in which we hope to achieve something," Mr Fox said, adding bankers "are not the sort of people that don't consider their options".

snip
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bankers ready to sue if bonuses too small (Original Post) stockholmer Jan 2012 OP
So let 'em. We'd watch that! lonestarnot Jan 2012 #1
Wonder how you'd ever seat a jury for that one BR_Parkway Jan 2012 #2
THE WAGES OF FAILURE merkozy Jan 2012 #3
I don't think they'd like the "bonus" I want to give them. hobbit709 Jan 2012 #4
Hmmm they love the free market Aerows Jan 2012 #5
Capitalism only rewards getting as much as you can - TBF Jan 2012 #6
Go ahead bankers. Throw yourselves a very public fit! lunatica Jan 2012 #7

merkozy

(9 posts)
3. THE WAGES OF FAILURE
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:08 AM
Jan 2012

Sue for bonuses? What idiot does that? Even shareholders, the owners of the company, do not sue for dividends. If they're not happy with the rewards, they take their money elsewhere. Isn't that what a free market is supposed to be, if such a thing ever exist? But not for the first time delusional bankers demonstrate they have completely lost touch with reality. No wonder people are asking, “Just who the hell are these people? Where do they come from? And what are they doing among us?” To answer a few of these questions, let's consult the reliable Oxford English Dictionary on the definition of the words bonus’ and ‘windfall’.

Bonus: Gratuity given as gift, or compensation earned as reward upon achieving a goal or milestone, over and above what is usual or expected.

Windfall: A sudden, unexpected piece of good fortune or personal gain which is not a direct result of something that the recipient did.

From the above definition, it is clear that what bankers call a bonus is nothing of the sort. Indeed, not even the word windfall gives sufficient justice to bankers’ actions, considering that banks are and have for the past 4 years been heavily-dependent on taxpayer-sponsored intravenous tubes for both essential nutrition and critical medication.

http://www.maverickonomics.com/2011/11/30/the-market-acording-to-the-fundamentalists/

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
4. I don't think they'd like the "bonus" I want to give them.
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:11 AM
Jan 2012

Let's just say that Jesus went easy on the moneylenders.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
5. Hmmm they love the free market
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:12 AM
Jan 2012

until it doesn't benefit them. So rather than accepting that public opinion is against them, which is what they claim keeps them in check, they sue to make sure they get everything they can.

These guys are crooks. I see none of them are threatening to quit - just threatening to sue.

TBF

(32,017 posts)
6. Capitalism only rewards getting as much as you can -
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:14 AM
Jan 2012

it doesn't have anything to do with "public opinion".

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
7. Go ahead bankers. Throw yourselves a very public fit!
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 10:16 AM
Jan 2012

Make a lot of noise and whine a lot and kick your heals a lot and pout a lot so we can all watch you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bankers ready to sue if b...