General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGlen Kirschner, former Federal prosecutor: "You can't steal the presidency...
...then hold up the presidency as a shield against getting indicted for stealing the presidency."
Just now on Morning Joe.
Makes perfect sense, but when he said it, it made my head spin, because it IS "Trump logic."
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)...the need to maintain a pardon possibility for Flynn despite his cooperation, since Trump may well know far less about what Flynn has furnished (and as yet withheld) than information gathered via Cohen.
In this manner, the question of Trumps pardon intent can be seen as a factor in Judge Sullivans instruction that Flynn further cooperate prior to the now-delayed sentencing.
OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)possible benefit is a pardon to Flynn ? Even Jill Winebanks was stumped as to a reason. I wonder if this is causing concern for Bob Mueller ?
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Flynn had his own career and backstory, and while apparently Trumps close associate since the campaign, has a traditional history and network that is much more distant and uncertain for trump... and if history is any indication, trumps efforts to protect Flynn, which continue to the present day, are rooted not in personal loyalty, but a fear for his own liability...
OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)so useful, and had told them everything, he didn't want any jail time for him. I know Trump isn't a mensa candidate but even he couldn't see what that meant.
The only thing I could see is that Mueller is bluffing and Trump (through Flynn) knows he's bluffing), but even that's a stretch.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)There are any number of reasons and your hypothesis is far out but not impossible. To me, though, the continuing support of Flynn is designed to leave open the potential for pardon by Trump, and is largely in place due to his uncertainty about what role Flynn has played in the investigation (and how Flynn might continue to play a further role by cooperation). It matches both Trump's consistently pro-Flynn stance since before the start of his administration, and the judge's admonition despite Flynn's ostensibly complete cooperation in ways few other factors seem to do.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)As a former Army prosecutor, he did not see Sullivans comments as nearly as intemperate as did Chuck Rosenberg or Joyce Vance.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)kentuck
(111,078 posts)He should be indicted. That would bring him back to the real world.