Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Takket

(21,524 posts)
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 05:53 PM Dec 2018

Reminder... Congress does not need drumpf to "give in" and sign a CR without money for the wall

Congress can pass a CR, drumpf can veto it, and Congress can override his veto.

It is that simple rethugs. You want to get this done, just override him.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reminder... Congress does not need drumpf to "give in" and sign a CR without money for the wall (Original Post) Takket Dec 2018 OP
Trump could also pull a pocket veto, and let it sit on his desk until the money ran out htuttle Dec 2018 #1
Iirc a pocket veto only works if Congress adjourns shanny Dec 2018 #2
True, and apparently it only takes a single Senator to gavel the Senate in and out of session htuttle Dec 2018 #3
Ever since Shrub recess-appointed Bolton (2005) BumRushDaShow Dec 2018 #4
" just override him." mitch96 Dec 2018 #5
They need him to stop a Friday night shutdown. Jim Lane Dec 2018 #6

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
1. Trump could also pull a pocket veto, and let it sit on his desk until the money ran out
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 05:57 PM
Dec 2018

I'm not sure that Congress can do much about that, other than impeach for dereliction of duty, which they won't do.

on edit:
If Congress stayed in session for the next 10 days, it would just become law. But I don't think they'll do that either.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
2. Iirc a pocket veto only works if Congress adjourns
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 06:03 PM
Dec 2018

during the 10 days. If they don't the law goes into effect.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
3. True, and apparently it only takes a single Senator to gavel the Senate in and out of session
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 06:12 PM
Dec 2018

Looks like the Democrats did that over Christmas in 2007. (just looked this up)

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/31/senate.pro.forma/

So, Congress could prevent the shutdown simply by someone staying in DC, if they wanted to. But would the Republicans 'defy' Hair Trump so directly? It seems like it's up to Republicans to decide to stay in session or adjourn right now, from what I understand.



BumRushDaShow

(128,257 posts)
4. Ever since Shrub recess-appointed Bolton (2005)
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 06:34 PM
Dec 2018

Congress has been doing pro-forma sessions (gaveling in and & out every 3 days during breaks). When Obama attempted to appoint some NLRB members during such a pro-forma session, arguing that it was bogus because no one was really "there", he was sued and lost at the SCOTUS because the SCOTUS indicated that Congress made its own rules and if they said that pro-formas were enough to be considered "in session" and not "adjourned", then so be it.

Usually the congressional "locals" (MD/VA/WV/DE) are in the area and can do it.

Article I

Section 5.

Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

Each House shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may in their judgment require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the members of either House on any question shall, at the desire of one fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.

Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

<...>

Section 7.

All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.

Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a law. But in all such cases the votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.

Every order, resolution, or vote to which the concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the same shall take effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the rules and limitations prescribed in the case of a bill.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei


As a sidenote - if they did just wait it out to let it go into effect, there would still be a shutdown over the 10 days until the CR would "legally" go into effect without an explicit signature UNLESS someone invokes an obscure rule that will "stop the clock" (although I don't know if it has ever been "stopped" that long).

mitch96

(13,868 posts)
5. " just override him."
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 07:57 PM
Dec 2018

Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please!
m

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
6. They need him to stop a Friday night shutdown.
Thu Dec 20, 2018, 09:11 PM
Dec 2018

If he doesn't veto but just sits on it, they have nothing to override.

This is one consequence of following the usual practice of taking it right to the brink. If they had passed a clean CR two weeks ago, things would be different. Trump might save face by letting the bill become law without his signature. Alternatively, if he vetoed it, then Congress might conceivably muster two-thirds to override him.

As it is, they're stuck. If he refuses to budge, then the money for several agencies will run out on Friday night. After that it would take a while for even a unanimous Congress to end the fiasco.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reminder... Congress does...