General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI see the Russian Trollmeisters have decided a Bernie vs. Beto war is to their benefit.
It was, perhaps, inevitable.
I just wish they weren't getting so much volunteer help.
wearily,
Bright
dogman
(6,073 posts)There's not enough real news to report.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)LakeArenal
(28,813 posts)Big target until they smear you or someone more likely target enters the race. 🎯
Paka
(2,760 posts)I realize because I am out of the country and don't tweet that I'm often behind on news updates, but I haven't seen where either Beto or Bernie have officially declared. The media is doing a lot of the declaring at the moment.
LakeArenal
(28,813 posts)The more the public talks Beto the bigger the target to smear.
Having said that, Beto is an exciting prospect.
JI7
(89,244 posts)LakeArenal
(28,813 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)that he's not really a progressive. Shouldn't that make Republicans happy?
mucifer
(23,522 posts)Not the posters I just don't pay attention to the posts.
elleng
(130,854 posts)Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
Link to tweet
Not Russian.
Qutzupalotl
(14,300 posts)and emotions flaring for no discernable reason. These are often the hallmarks of manipulation.
We are a big site in Google rankings, so we are a target. Lots of people lurk, so the examples we set and the ideas we generate reverberate wider than one might think.
susanna
(5,231 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Besides the trolls, who are bad enough, there's also those well-meaning, but easely diverted, Democrats who are so agitated and hungry to tear into Trump in 2020 that they're willing to tear into a potentially weak Democrat now.
I sometimes wonder if a little bit of negative campaigning is good practice for a potential nominee, but for right now I think we do best to see which Democrats are good at getting voters excited.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)The same trolls keep posting bull shit, and the same people take the bait day in and day out. The best way to deal with trolls is not to feed them. Their only goal here is to stir shit up, just like they did in 2016.
Yosemito
(648 posts)Their preference has been clear since 2016, as Mueller and intelligence agencies have noted.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)...or any Democrat has stood up to Russia and stood up for America and the rights of Americans to vote and let their voices be heard free of interference from those countries that would promote a US at war with itself and isolated from trade and treaties with its neighbors. A Democrat who will push back on the populist push against globalism.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)democratic party as they always look for a reason to take their ball home, just like 2000
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)(They are right in the center. They represent a shift towards progressive, humane values that has been trending since Bush II.)
Bucky
(53,986 posts)I think we can let those poles stew 10 or 11 months before taking any of them seriously. I'm so eager to see which woman breaks out from the pack. I was convinced it would be Harris, but Klobuchar seems to be making smart moves. I find both of them appealing candidates
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)I was discussing how the public has moved towards the left (i.e. its a more informed, high-information voting public) and I questioned the characterization of Bernie et al as far left. Tell me precisely how your candidates are addressing real issues, not whether they play the game well or whether they fall into a gender category. What are their positions on guns, tax loopholes favoring the overpaid, green issues, etc.
Can we leave it to the MSM for horse race talk?
yardwork
(61,588 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
Link to tweet
yardwork
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Fox, Limbaugh, Daily Caller, Breitbart feed this tooo.
Nictuku
(3,601 posts)Don't take the bait!
Ferrets are Cool
(21,105 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)100%
elmac
(4,642 posts)who is F'ing who, DU should ban all this infighting crap.
Theres a rule but some continue jumping in every chance they get.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)is one of the biggest problems we face in the next couple of years. Accusations will fly freely over whoever gets a bit of a leg up in the race to the nomination.
Unless a front-runner emerges quickly and stays in that position, we run the risk of tearing each other apart while Drumpf laughs.
Cha
(297,071 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)that went on this past election. We know who is being divisive and who they hope it helps. We wont fall for the both sides distraction. We know who Beto is a threat to.
Cha
(297,071 posts)candidates are attacking Beto.. only BS' fans.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Kahuna7
(2,531 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)UTUSN
(70,672 posts)Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)He hasnt declared anything. Hes just representing the border areas and being an actual impressive person and everybody is losing it.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Leith
(7,808 posts)It's got so bad that I won't even click on a thread that mentions Bernie, Beto, and whatever the latest big headline is.
It's so damn tiresome.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Baltimike
(4,140 posts)it's crazy
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Expect any and all kinds of distraction in the next few weeks.
Catch2.2
(629 posts)Same crap. Let's not fall for it this time.
912gdm
(959 posts)n/t.
PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)Bernie or Beto.
But on the Hill, I saw this: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/422674-sanders-supporters-deny-coordinated-attacks-on-orourkes-progressive
You all know, we do tend to create circular firing squads. In 2020 I will not be supporting Bernie if he runs, simply because we need some new blood.
I'm thinking the smears are because Beto is seen at this point as a strong Democratic contender who could probably win the general election. And, you know, let's get the oil and gas contributions out of the way from the get-go. Beto is in TX, for God's sake. The whole state is a huge oil well. Of course the industry will hedge its bets. They gave Cruz more.
You know the real problem? The media loves a horse race because it raises ratings which produces more profit. See, they are the major cash customer for the super pacs created through Citizens United. So if you all think the media hates Citizens United, think again. That ruling has made political campaigns a giant cash cow for companies like Comcast (see and support Elizabeth Warren's 'Accountable Capitalism Act' she introduced earlier this year.) Here's a couple of links. This is an Act worth massive support from Democratic rank and file.
https://www.vox.com/2018/8/15/17683022/elizabeth-warren-accountable-capitalism-corporations (favorable)
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/15/economist-warrens-accountable-capitalism-act-seriously-misguided-.html (OMG, gasp! It's gonna destroy capitalism!)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/15/elizabeth-warren-accountable-capitalism-act-richest-companies (favorable)
Up to us, people. We gotta make it happen in 2020 and not let the Russian trolls fuck us up again. Because they did. Our guys have to take on an 'in your face' aggressive stance in fact checking and squelching rumors.
Next, make it known to your Democratic Senators and Reps, as well as candidates in 2020 that we need to end the media gravy train by ending Citizens United and forcing dissolution of super pacs.
Last, support the National Popular Vote Compact because we need to get rid of the Electoral College.
George II
(67,782 posts)www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
As the Texas congressman's star rises, Sanders supporters turn up the heat: "Reading Karl Marx is cool. Doing a livestream while youre doing your laundry is a gimmick."
Dec. 23, 2018 / 11:27 AM EST / Updated 8:15 PM EST
By Jonathan Allen and Alex Seitz-Wald
WASHINGTON Forces loyal to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders are waging an increasingly public war against Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke, the new darling of Democratic activists, as the two men weigh whether to seek the party's presidential nomination in 2020.
The main line of attack against O'Rourke is that he isn't progressive enough that he's been too close to Republicans in Congress, too close to corporate donors and not willing enough to use his star power to help fellow Democrats and it is being pushed almost exclusively by Sanders supporters online and in print.
It's been the first flashpoint in what promises to be a politically bloody primary one that has drawn responses from foot soldiers in the Obama and Clinton wings of the party as Democrats begin to focus on who has the best chance to deny President Donald Trump a second term in the Oval Office.
Nomiki Konst, a progressive activist and 2016 Sanders supporter who is now running for public advocate in New York City, said liberal activists mostly kept quiet about their concerns over O'Rourke's record, including the backing he got from the centrist Blue Dog Democrats, before he lost a Texas Senate race to Republican Ted Cruz in November.
"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
(more....)
Cha
(297,071 posts)Russia is happy though.
There's the PROOF right there>>>>>>>>>
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
Thanks George.. the link doesn't work, though.. I found it!
brooklynite
(94,485 posts)Or is that our answer for any inconvenient news?
Hekate
(90,627 posts)...find a wedge issue, any wedge issue on any side, and hammer it in. They play all sides, as long as it divides us. They've even gotten involved in the anti-vaxxer mommy groups. How's that for sick? So online people playing the wide eyed innocent about Beto not being progressive and trying to dig up any old thing from his past is child's play.
George II
(67,782 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
I'm sure Russia is up to their old tricks but so are others.
Hekate
(90,627 posts)...than being supported by Blue Dog Democrats.
Cha
(297,071 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
Link to tweet
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)marlakay
(11,446 posts)In fact most of the people thinking of running I like.
My preference even though I was Bernie last time is to have someone younger so I will support Beto this time.
spike91nz
(180 posts)Dint throw me in that progressive briar patch.
George II
(67,782 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)betsuni
(25,449 posts)Ugh.
Cha
(297,071 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)So inane
Thanks to Biden for that brilliant line about 9/11. Biden/Beto!
Cha
(297,071 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Harry Enten has some good analysis https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/14/politics/bernie-sanders-beto-orourke-supporters-2020/index.html
Among the most prominent critics are supporters of Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders who believes the Texan isn't progressive enough.
Sanders fans have at least some reason to worry. O'Rourke or really any other candidate with outsider appeal could eat into Sanders' base of young, independent-leaning voters.
If Sanders is going to win in 2020, he'll need to hold onto his support from 2016. He won more than 40% of the national primary vote, though he lost by low double-digits to Clinton national
irresistable
(989 posts)We don't know who is actually going to run. It is possible that neither Beto nor Bernie will run.
It will all sort itself out.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)I personally doubt that sanders will comply with the new DNC rule that will require sanders to state in writing that he (i) is an actual member of the Democratic party, (ii) will run as a member of the Democratic Party and (iii) will govern as a member of the Democratic Party if elected. The new DNC rule will force sanders to take actions that he has refused to commit to in the past. In addition, to get onto the ballot in Maryland and a couple of blue states, sanders will have to release full and complete copies of five or ten years of tax returns. I doubt that sanders will do this.
In the meantime, these attacks on Beto and Senator Harris by sanders supporters are not good for the party
irresistable
(989 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 25, 2018, 11:22 PM - Edit history (1)
It is better for candidates to be forced to express their rationale for their votes or actions sooner rather than later.
This is politics.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Link to tweet
Two veterans of Mr. Sanderss 2016 campaign, Becky Bond and Zack Malitz, were instrumental this year in helping to organize Mr. ORourkes race against Senator Ted Cruz. Both said they are eager to be a part of any Beto for President effort.
I dont know if Beto is going to run, but if he does Im all in, said Ms. Bond.
Mr. Malitz added: I want Beto to run and would want to work on that campaign.
irresistable
(989 posts)There are so many people who are talking about running and I like them all.
It does make me sad that there are some on this site who have such animosity toward a few of the potential candidates.
Cha
(297,071 posts)There are a lot of brilliant energetic Democrats who are going to run.
Hekate
(90,627 posts)...that there was not a small volunteer brigade here.
Equally wearily,
Hekate
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)Sad.
Like for both parties to come together and denounce this as just more Russian "Fake News"
BannonsLiver
(16,352 posts)emulatorloo
(44,106 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)dalton99a
(81,428 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Because the Russians have to put in less work for bigger gain with them. He was their tool of division in2016 and are hoping to have the same tool this time around.
From the convention:
Paladin
(28,246 posts)Kahuna7
(2,531 posts)being played for useful idiots.
Gothmog
(145,063 posts)relayerbob
(6,544 posts)ananda
(28,856 posts)They're both wonderful!
Iggo
(47,547 posts)Yayl
demmiblue
(36,837 posts)pwb
(11,258 posts).
George II
(67,782 posts)pwb
(11,258 posts)Clear you don't like her George. Your on every post.
George II
(67,782 posts)....just before and during you posting that claim. Are you keeping score?
pwb
(11,258 posts)And noticed you comment on most of them. Its more of a memory thing than keeping score.
George II
(67,782 posts)...the one that she'll be representing is the District in which I grew up (from 8 years old to my mid-20s)
You don't have a monopoly on interest in particular politicians who are from your state. But it is bizarre that you took notice.
So, since the Russians are "all over AOC", on what do you base that?
pwb
(11,258 posts)challenging the old guard. Pushing petty little things about her that don't amount to shit. Typical Russian or any troll tactics are to divide the party. I don't have any monopoly on any thoughts but i can pick out negativity when i see it. We are all entitled to our opinions about any politician. My opinion of AOC is to give her a chance, as a democrat i owe her that. Merry Christmas.
George II
(67,782 posts)...who "bad mouths" (again, your words) Joseph Crowley, Tammy Duckworth, Kirsten Gillibrand, and others and who vigorously campaigns against Sharice Davids, Lacy Clay, Andrew Cuomo, Gretchen Whitmer and others?
pwb
(11,258 posts)But you keep up your division. Im done with you george. Feel like your baiting me.
melman
(7,681 posts)And I noticed that too. I'm sure many have.
I mean, how could they not? Amazing how defensive some can get about such obvious things.
George II
(67,782 posts)Not sure what you're asking there. So sorry.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)that 'great' doesn't only means great at something?
Is that the game here? We don't know that it can be used more generally as a term of approval? That's cute.
But okay, if the question is at what do I think she's great, then one thing is she never takes any shit at all from right-wingers.
She's really great at that. I suppose there are some that wouldn't appreciate such a thing but I really do think it's great.
George II
(67,782 posts)....it's not even the subject of the discussion, which is "I see the Russian Trollmeisters have decided a Bernie vs. Beto war is to their benefit."
I think if you take another look at the the first post I replied to you'll find it expressed a sentiment similar to mine.
That's why I said "I agree".
And with that we are done here. Unless you'd care to explain that sig pic.
question everything
(47,462 posts)Constantly.
Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
Cha
(297,071 posts)are the ones who are "helping".
"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
demmiblue
(36,837 posts)It is the same small group (as well as their socks and zombies) that constantly stirs shit year after year.
We have bigger fish to fry, imo.
Cha
(297,071 posts)"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/inside-bernie-world-s-war-beto-o-rourke-n951016
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Or the kind of people that booed John Lewis at the convention?
I know where my bets are placed.
Cha
(297,071 posts)I'm sure they're happy about it, though.
"They sucked it up while he was running" because they wanted him to win, Konst said. "But now its a different story."
Link to tweet
EllieBC
(3,013 posts)They would never ever ever dream of trying to divide the party.
I guess we get to live 2015/2016 all over again with their bullshit.
Cha
(297,071 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)TygrBright
(20,756 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)the BS surrogates who started this and are continuing it..
Link to tweet
Of course the Russians are happy with any discord in the Democratic Party.
TygrBright
(20,756 posts)Cha
(297,071 posts)short little post. It's ridiculous.
MuseRider
(34,104 posts)from this website makes a difference. A bunch of trolls here and a bunch of trolls there and a bunch of people who feel the need to defend and correct. All one needs is a head on their shoulders and a grasp of reality and they will use blocks, hide a thread or just ignore the people who love to stir the trouble up. Nobody wins or loses elections here but a lot of people lose their minds.
SixString
(1,057 posts)Marrah_Goodman
(1,586 posts)Hopefully people here are smart enough to know better.
betsuni
(25,449 posts)We had to hear for years and years how President Obama was going to cut Social Security, start WWIII, kill everyone with drones, etc., and then came Hillary Clinton and oh dear, all the evil things she was going to do. So "concerned," just holding feet to the fire, they'd say. But now quoting Bernie Sanders or AOC and discussing what they say is "bashing," and no matter how often it's explained that Beto and other Democrats are not corrupt because they take individual contributions from employees of companies for their campaigns, doesn't make a dent. I wonder how many such people are left.
Yeah, it's the volunteers who are the most annoying. The emotional, angry, true believers who always resort to personal insults while insisting their fantasies about what terrible corrupt things Democrats have done and will do is about policy. I don't even think I've seen that many professionals. I remember some from 2016 because of their style: rapid-fire posting, repeating the same things, logical fallacies down pat.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)We'll show them!!
BannonsLiver
(16,352 posts)Russian trolls use divides that already exist and amplify them. In this case its the coordinated attack in the media by one candidates acolytes on another candidate. .