Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts) Wed Jan 4, 2012, 08:41 AM Jan 2012

So Mittens didn't break 25%- AGAIN!

Mitt Romney 30,015 24.6%
Rick Santorum 30,007 24.5%
Ron Paul 26,219 21.4%
Newt Gingrich 16,251 13.3%
Rick Perry 12,604 10.3%
Michele Bachmann 6,073 5%
Jon Huntsman 745 0.6%
Herman Cain 58 0%
Buddy Roemer 31 0%
No Preference 135 0.1%
Other 117 0.1%

Some things just don't seem to change.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Mittens didn't break 25%- AGAIN! (Original Post) TexasProgresive Jan 2012 OP

Yep, he is still made of paper. asjr Jan 2012 #1

It's more historic than that Proud Public Servant Jan 2012 #2

I wonder what scum-suckers constitute the 117 "Other" CanonRay Jan 2012 #3

asjr

(10,479 posts)

1. Yep, he is still made of paper.

Reply to TexasProgresive (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 08:52 AM

Jan 2012

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)

2. It's more historic than that

Reply to TexasProgresive (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 09:01 AM

Jan 2012

Mittens actually just became the Iowa "winner" with the lowest percentage of the vote ever (wresting the crown from Bob Dole in '96), and the only candidate to "win" with less than 25% of the vote.

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)

3. I wonder what scum-suckers constitute the 117 "Other"

Reply to TexasProgresive (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 11:08 AM

Jan 2012

One can only imagine "fringe" Republican candidates.

Reply to this discussion