General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh FFS... Ryan voted for the 2008 Stimulus Act
Of course he voted for the wars and other budget-busting Bush nonsense. That's to be expected. But how does the supposed most principled anti-Keynesian in the world vote to send everyone a check for $300 to stimulate the economy?
Seems rather a waste of money for something you "know" cannot possibly work.
Government debt-funded direct stimulus was effective economic policy in February, 2008. By January, 2009 it was an insane communist doctrine that had never worked and never could work as it ran counter to everything "we" know about economics.
At least I know my first debate question for the VP debate if I'm called to fill-in at the last moment.
"Representative Ryan, if President Obama proposed stimulating the economy by borrowing money in order to send every American tax-filer a check for $300, would you vote for that? And I do have a follow-up question...
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll025.xml
lunatica
(53,410 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)liar, opportunist and protector of tax cuts for the rich.
Paul Ryan questioned over apparent shifts on issues
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021149046
Krugman: Whats In The Ryan Plan?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021142015
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)What a giant hypocrite.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)SDjack
(1,448 posts)for a taxcut.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Since the checks went only to tax-filers one could tell himself that they were a retroactive tax cut.
Anything that does not benefit the indigent is a tax cut... it's magic.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)And how was it different? Look, ummm, I haven't read the report, I'll have to get back to you on that.....
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)on Melissa Harris-Perry.