General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Bernie won the Dem nomination for President, would he decline it, like he does in Vermont
when he wins the Democratic nomination for Senate?
And having declined the Democratic nomination for President, would he run as an Independent?
And then what? Would we not run any Democrat? Because otherwise we're looking at a 3-way contest, with the progressive vote split between an Independent who'd declined the Democratic nomination, and a Democrat who'd come in at second place.
I was surprised when Bernie left the party after the convention, but nothing he does would surprise me anymore.
manor321
(3,344 posts)One of them is remaining a Democrat after winning the nomination.
There are new rules.
Electrical Arc
(38 posts)And will stay a Dem if he wins the primaries.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Electrical Arc
(38 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
Electrical Arc
(38 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)I also note that Maryland currently has adopted and a couple blue states are in the process of adopting ballot access laws that will require release of tax returns
I personally believe that sanders is out trying to sell his very poorly reviewed book and will not run in 2020
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)And I'm not aware of any promises he made last time to remain a Democrat.
Electrical Arc
(38 posts)So you want to make it more difficult for him in 2020?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)And I didn't know that's what he would do after winning the Democratic nomination for Senator of Vermont -- that he would decline the nomination and run as an Independent instead.
I also didn't know that he would refuse to make his tax returns public. I think ANYONE who runs should have to make at least 5 years of returns public before entering the primaries.
Demsrule86
(68,471 posts)Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders will remain with the party if he does not get the nomination, his campaign manager said Wednesday.
https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/277086-sanders-will-be-democrat-for-life-campaign-says
Cha
(296,875 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)and won't be until he submits a signed document affirming that he is a member of the Democratic party.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)aidbo
(2,328 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)that, but that is the reality
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)These democrats will not forget or forgive
JI7
(89,241 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)As a Bernie Primary voter I guarantee it. He had his shot, I for one will never cast a ballot for him unless he is the nominee,... and he won't be the nominee.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Post removed
Cha
(296,875 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Cha
(296,875 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Or if they win the election, then leave the party?
Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)
can anyone run as a Democrat by just saying they are one?
is it just restricted to "Independent" or "Non-Partisan" people?
can a Republican run as a Democrat? Joe Scarborough has said he's no longer a Republican, so can he run? Mike Bloomberg... is he a Democrat or Independent?
This is a confusing issue, for me... I think people running in the Democratic Primaries should be Democrats... maybe for a period of time... be inclusive, but give people some time in the Democratic Party. A Bernie Sanders in 2016 could get in early on his public record, but there should be some guidelines!
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)agenda. I could be wrong?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)so it could be that the state has not fully embraced his views.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Which is why I worry about what he would have done if he'd gotten the nomination for President.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/21/bernie-sanders-democrat-independent-vermont-601844
Bernie Sanders is running for the Democratic nomination in Vermont but he wont accept it if he wins.
The famously independent senator, who briefly joined the Democratic Party to run in the 2016 New Hampshire presidential primary only to un-enroll later, officially announced Monday that he would seek a third term in the Senate this fall. He also said that hell pull the same maneuver that he did in his 2006 and 2012 Senate races: Running as a Democrat, declining the nomination when he wins and then running as an independent.
The move makes it virtually impossible for another Democrat to seek the partys nod. And it allows Sanders to loom large in the party primary in August, but still preserve his independence.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)The bottom line is he is very well liked in Vermont. I remember hearing about him working with Kennedy getting heating oil up there for the elderly.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)for President, and then decline the nomination if he wins. That would be a slap in the face to the party.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)A good slap in the face at times wake ppl. up, rhetorically speaking that is.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)to have our nominee be someone who'd just rejected the party. Vermont may love Bernie and his tactics, but Vermont isn't the US.
And fortunately, I've learned from responses here that new party rules will prevent him from doing so.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Vermont Yankee's are what gave us america. and they still have not change after 200+ years. If a conservative Vermont voter likes sanders he is a shoe in for new england.
ppl. love him you are screwed.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)He wasn't a shoe-in for New England in 2016 -- he and Hillary split New England, in case you didn't notice.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)he gets elected. Vermont hypothetically could be 100% minority and still be elected year after year. demo's I do not think matter with Vermont.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)If you want to play devils advocate, at least deal in reality.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Lots of good candidates to choose from.
Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)have a third party candidate in 2020. There will be a real Democrat running for President in 2020. Democrats have a ballot line in every state, third party candidates have to spend a fortune to get on those 50 ballots.
Putin has to find a third party candidate who really wants the GOP to win. Bernie running to help Putin and the Trumpistanis would surprise me
Cha
(296,875 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)In Vermont he has to enter the democratic primary to stop a split vote in the General. There is no reason for that in the presidential race.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)And how do we know he wouldn't have declined the Presidential nomination as he did in VT?
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)The fact that he would have won the nomination should be proof enough that his vision was dominant in the party. Why throw cold water on everyone else by refusing the nomination?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I just hope that he is not like that in the event that he wins the national nomination.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But apparently we're filthy and he doesn't wanna do that.
Go away, Bernie.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)I won't be supporting Bermie in the Presidential Primary, but his willingness to forego the Democratic nomination in Vermont has no comparison to the Presidential Election
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)If he declined at the convention, would the second vote getter receive the nomination?
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In Vermont he has always made it clear, in advance of the primary, that if he wins he'll decline the nomination.
What really irritates some people is that, despite all the sage advice on DU pointing out how evil Bernie Sanders is, the Democrats of Vermont keep voting for him in the primary. The Vermont Democratic Party persists in featuring him on its website and accepting his help in fundraising.
People who disagree with his course of action, and who choose to vote for someone else in the Vermont Democratic primary, certainly have that right. So far, they have been in a small minority among actual Vermont voters, whatever their message-board strength might be.
Bernie sought the Democratic nomination for President because, duh, there are relevant differences between running in Vermont and running nationwide. He was vilified by some people for running in the Democratic primaries, vilified even more for NOT running as an independent or a Green in the general election after he lost the nomination, and vilified particularly for endorsing and campaigning for the Democratic nominee. He stuck to his guns despite all this opprobrium.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)much less to not declining the nomination if he wins the primaries.
So we'll see.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)Anybody who agrees with his positions would find mainstream democrats more alienating, whether sanders was in the race or not, and given that Sanders pulled in a huge chunk of democratic voters, that argument could certainly be made. You see?
Or more likely, Just having different opinions about our direction doesn't make HIM the divisive one, it just suggests that we have some divisions on the issues, which we can have and still come together around the candidate we ultimately elect.
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Because last time, Bernie's refusal to concede after it was mathematically impossible for him to win (in early May) caused trouble for the party down-ticket funding. Hillary raised tons of money, but it could not be released until Bernie conceded, and since he refused, it could not be spent, per the agreement she signed with the DNC that the nominee (regardless of whether she became the nominee or not) should decide how the money was spent. This hobbled many of our competitive races in '16. To add insult to injury, Sanders' supporters attacked her for not giving the money down-ticket and insinuated she was keeping the money for herself, when in fact it was Sanders who was the roadblock there.
So, regardless of fucking cries of 'rigged' and all, I hope the DNC makes sure that a candidate like Sanders cannot make down-ticket races harder to win because he or she refuses to concede even when it is impossible for them to win.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In the 2020 cycle, the DNC should not sign any agreement with any campaign unless the same agreement on exactly the same terms is expressly offered to every campaign. Furthermore, no agreement, even if it might net the DNC a lot of money, should say that the DNC's selection of a communications director or any other position will be from among candidates approved by any of the campaigns.
Finally, any fundraising agreement with any of the campaigns should be contemporaneously made public. As Louis Brandeis wrote, sunshine is the best of disinfectants.
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)So I doubt he would decline. But this wont be an issue because he cannot win.
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)They didn't in 2016, either. He didn't win enough primary delegates to gain that designation.
Frankly, in 2020, I believe he would have even fewer delegates to the nominating convention.
I strongly suggest that Bernie Sanders stick to his Senate job as the Independent he is.
We don't believe him when he claims to be a Democrat just to run for President, any longer. As soon as he was no longer a candidate, he dropped out of the Democratic Party. We should look at his long-term party designation. That is Independent.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)If he runs and if he wins that is.