General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy aren't there More Conservative Comedians?
I know many on the right see Obama as providing much more comedic material than comedians do. They often send me "jokes" about Obama on issues like Obamacare or the "Fast and Furious" program.
While I appreciate the sentiment, here's the cold, hard truth: Conservatives are not funny. I'm being brutally objective here. There are some funny conservative comedians and pundits, but how many can you name? I have my theories why conservatives struggle so horribly when trying to be funny, but I'll keep them to myself because I'm not a mental health professional.
--snip--
I'd go a step further and say that when humor is coming from a place of authoritarianism -- which modern conservatism is increasingly about -- it's inherently unfunny. It's just mean. That's a conceit that continues to be borne out every time I see the "humorous" postings by right-leaning friends and acquaintances on various social media platforms. Be sure to check out the rest of Obeidallah's piece here.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/entertainment/why-arent-there-more-conservative-comedians
Short answer: Because they are not funny. At all.
no_hypocrisy
(46,020 posts)Examples: Jay Leno, Ray Romano, Dennis Miller
Quantess
(27,630 posts)He is not the funniest man in the world, but I saw him once in Las Vegas and he was entertaining. He didnät have anything about politics or religion that night.
Edt: Oh, now I see. You posted 3 un-funny examples. I was wondering...
On Everybody Loves Raymond, Ray Romano was the least funny and Patricia Heaton was the 2nd least funny. Dennis Miller sucks rotten eggs. Dennis Miller is a total wash, since he tries to make political jokes.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)comments.
It's a shame that he's not more perceptive. Or that he does not hang around with honest people who can tell him that he's not a funny as he seems to think that he is.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)I didn't know he had any particular political views.
no_hypocrisy
(46,020 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)A lot of liberal comedians nailed Clinton on that one for years, too.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)It's true that Clinton had a big D after his name, but was he a liberal? Was Ray Romano merciless with Clinton on issues which Clinton demonstrated that he was a liberal?
It may be that Ray Romano was not funny, but does that make him a conservative?
no_hypocrisy
(46,020 posts)The fact that he thought he could elicit laughs on Clinton and the intern a decade after-the-fact indicates he wasn't liberal.
When it was "news" in the Nineties, almost all comedians took a shot at Clinton or what was happening. Even commentaries were amusing. (Example: I remember "Grandpa" Al Lewis on WBAI furious about the topic and shouting on air "Can someone tell me what the big deal is about a blowjob?" and THAT by itself was pretty funny.)
My point: there have been attempts to use conservative political leanings as stand-up but they just don't get the laughs as either liberal comedians or apolitical comedians.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)So true.
librechik
(30,673 posts)but true humor has a forgiving heart and a magnanimous love for the foibles and rare wisdom of humanity. A trait completely lacking in today's conservatives. They're just mean.
"comedy =tragedy+time" they don't have the patience or the understanding for the time part.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Conservatives by their nature mock the weak.
eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)In school, bullies always seemed to WANT to be funny, but could never manage it. And they always ended up going after, among others, the kids who do have a sense of humor.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Look at their stances on rape and women's rights. Those topics just cannot be made into a funny skit or a joke. Whereas, a car elevator just lends itself to digs and jokes.
htuttle
(23,738 posts)If a big guy kicks a little guy, it just seems mean.
That's why conservatives aren't funny.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)So that's the first thing. I also suspect there are more conservatives in the business than we might think (still a fairly small number), but they are closeted for fear of not getting work because of their politics.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)about the entertainment business as a whole (being) pretty liberal", because the entertainment business is a business ... focused on what sells to the public. If conservative thought sold, the entertainment industry would sell it ... Period.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Quite well, actually. Fox News has been number one in cable news for a while now and many prominent conservatives write books with good sales numbers. There's also radio and any number of conservative periodicals.
There's a lot of money to be made on conservatives, which is part of the reason Fox News exists in the first place.
I really do think the messages that come out of the entertainment business have to do with the fact that so many people who produce and write it are liberal.
treestar
(82,383 posts)The entertainment business has to be able to have people in it who are different. Conservatives don't like people being different.
For instance their inability to stay married to one person (with a few exceptions)
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,311 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)Stock conservative issues/positions (lower taxes, less regulation, certain interpretations of the constitution, etc.) are featured in conservative products that sell. Those aren't really hate/fear issues. You can make money articulating that stuff just as you can make money articulating liberal positions on these same issues.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,311 posts)... "I don't want my money going to black people."
The rest of those issues you mention?
Sure, they are featured. But those features aren't the main product or what sells to the average conservative riding around on his government paid hover-round screaming 'keep your government hands off my medicare.'
My car features back seat cup holders but that ain't why I purchased it.
I've known far too many so called conservatives in my day. Every one, to a tee, was, at heart, a big government loving teat-sucker. They just had a problem with anyone ELSE receiving government benefits.
I've never met a real conservative. I never met William F. Buckley - but I hear he was a racist homophobic pig too.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)skeptical at all?
The numbers are whatever they say that they are. If a well-financed publisher wants to push money in the direction of an "author," and uses inflated numbers to push more money in the direction of the "author," who is going to complain? Who is ever going to be in a position to say or or say, "The numbers are bogus."
The numbers are as accurate as Enron-type accounting. They are not verified by any governmental regulator. The "authors" in many cases, and in most cases or politicial-type books, are not even the authors of the books which are commonly ghost-written.
The ghost-writers "write books with good sales numbers"? There's no way to know for sure.
brush
(53,741 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)That pretty much nails it.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)most humor. It's alien to them.
When the king slips and lands ass-first in a mud puddle it is funny. Why? The gap between his pretentions and the actuality of being a human being sitting in a mud puddle. The conservative is outraged at this defilement of the dignity of the king. The liberal (or peasant) finds this immensely funny because it reinforces notions of common humanity and neatly deflates the king's claim to higher status.
Comedy is about nothing if not puncturing pretentions. Us poor folks don't have many pretentions to puncture. We're too busy dodging the mud puddles we are all too familiar with.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)rocktivity
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Answer the second question foist."
The Marx Brothers were my introduction to the ridiculousness of the upper classes and how deeply satisfying it is to see them put in their place - part of the rabble of humanity like the rest of us.
Groucho remains one of my true heroes to this day.
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)you nailed it
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Here's an illustration of such laws, from the Wikipedia entry on "lese-majeste' " an illustration that ends up being funny in spite of the intentions of those who created it in eighteenth-century Britain) :
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)history. I'd bet the ancient Egyptians were telling fart jokes. Carlin was right - farts are funny. They sound funny - even the word fart sounds funny.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Or trying to be. He's just not funny when talking in real time.
Slow the camera down a little bit, and watch his cheeks jiggle. You'd probably crack up too.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)period
MyshkinCommaPrince
(611 posts)Hadn't thought about it much, previously, but perhaps "conservative humor" would require a victim or scapegoat, and the culture at large isn't very receptive toward that sort of thing nowadays?
Huh. It's an interesting question.
JHB
(37,154 posts)Their comedy is making fun of the guy who walks in and starts gasping for air and saying "OH GOD What is that smell!? How can you people live like this!!!?"
If you don't basically agree with them, there's no context for the joke. It falls flat.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Exhibit A: Dennis Miller
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)when he took over editing the National Lampoon in the mid-1970's...racist, sexist, homophobic, poor-bashing(he always had a special fixation with single African-American mothers on welfare).
Before O'Rourke took over, the 'Poon went after Nixon and what he did to Vietnam and the country. Afterwords, it read like Rush Limbaugh on bath salts.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and then barbequeing them. After Nixon, the original target-rich comedic environment, resigned the newer generation of writers had to find something else to make fun of. I always thought O'Rourke was pretty damned funny at the 'poon until he admitted in 1980 that he was a repuke. Even a fair amount of his travel writing for Rolling Stone was pretty funny, but he completely fell off the Ayn Rand deep end in the late 1990s and hasn't written or said one funny thing since.
Hell, Michael O'Donoghue was a far blacker, crueler, and meaner writer than O'Rourke ever dreamed of being or ever could be. Mr. Mike could really make you wince and cringe as he made you laugh and wonder if you really should be laughing.
BTW, O'Rourke is a Miami of Ohio alum, just like Lyin' Ryan. Though to be fair O'Rourke also got a Master's in Englsh from Johns Hopkins.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)while O'Rourke was merely a clever fuck with his finger in the wind
five_horizons
(151 posts)That's all I got.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)I don't. YMMV.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)He's the most unfunny piece of shit I've ever seen work a club. Just horrible. Makes Dennis Miller look like fucking Chris Rock.
surrealAmerican
(11,357 posts)You need to recognize how your own beliefs are, in at least some ways, ridiculous. Conservatives are more apt to miss the detachment that leads to that understanding.
msu2ba
(340 posts)humor has to have some basis in truth. Dennis Miller making a joke about the President being stupid isn't funny to most Americans because it doesn't have that nugget of truth at its core.
Proles
(466 posts)Any attempt to put their views into comedy would just show how lame and ridiculous their thought process actually is.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)SNIP
Mort was really rolling during the Sixties. Then, Jack Kennedy was assassinated. Jim Garrison,the New Orleans DA, found the assassination to be an inside job, and, in one of the bravest acts in recent American History, sued Clay Shaw and the CIA, and got as far as a jury trial. Many people do not know that Mort worked with Garrison as an unpaid investigator on the case. Mort was a smart man, politically and socially, involved in a very heavy, publicized case. The government planted agents inside Garrisons staff, spirited witnesses out of the state, tapped phones, and put forth a lot of effort for a case that they and their stooges in the press ridiculed.
Many among us, including educated Liberals, know that we killed Torrijos in Panama, Lumumba in Africa, Mossadeq in Iran, pushed Aristide out of Haiti. We supported the murderous Sadaam Hussein in the eighties and early nineties, knowing what and who he was. Rumsfeld even sold him the nerve gas he used on the Iranians and the Kurds. Thanks to Youtube, we have Dick Cheney stating, famously, in 1994, what a tactical mistake it would be to invade Iraq. More recently, we invaded Panama, and kidnapped the Sovereign leader of a neighboring country. Why? Because he was getting ready to spill the beans on the Bush family, Iran Contra, and cocaine trafficking. Knowing this to be true, why is it so difficult to believe that these same fascist forces of darkness would kill President Kennedy. He said "I intend to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces."
MORE
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)One of his best lines: "Washington couldn't tell a lie, Nixon couldn't tell the truth, and Reagan can't tell the difference."
MortSahlFan
(55 posts)Making friends with a Conservative isn't a big deal...
When he was accused of being a Communist, he said "I'd scare them off if they knew how more far-out I am". But as the previous poster said, "Everyone is fair game" - that keeps EVERYONE honest.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 26, 2023, 08:52 AM - Edit history (11)
...(W)hy is it that so much right-wing political humor just plain doesn't work -- even for its target audience?...I think...(it)...has to do with the basic conflict between comedy and authority...(D)isrespect for authority is the foundation of real comedy...
Mocking the powerful has the positive effect of reminding everyone that though these figures may be powerful, they are not superhuman, and can be resisted/outwitted/defied; it also has the therapeutic effect of validating the anger and pain we feel as we suffer for these people, and reminding us that in fact, it's not us, it's them.
Mocking the vulnerable is just bullying, and all it does is pander to the audience's worst instincts. Right-wing pundits in the main either don't understand this rule, or have a seriously warped understanding of who's vulnerable and who's powerful... link
And here are some thoughts I had about Jon Stewart, Steve Colbert, and their ill-fated competition, Fox News' Half Hour News Hour:
Last night's TDS featured a segment where CNN turned Anna Nicole Smith's "Fridge of Death" into an investigation of the contents of the CNN break room refrigerator, followed by a segment on a group who likes to swim in the northern Atlantic in the winter. The story that's supposed to be "real" news feels fake; the story that sounds like it must be fake is real. And THAT'S why we laugh--even when it's the Dems who get skewered.
The Half Hour News Hour seems to believe Stewart and Colbert are funny because they spend most of their time insulting conservatism. It tries to retaliate by insulting liberalism, but nobody's laughing -- why? It's because the Half Hour News Hour is rooted in fake news. It can't condemn liberalism without exposing its own sins, so it can't help but congeal into a cringe-inducing caricature of neocon media. I mean, where does Fox News get off poking fun of Obama's media hype when they just finished trying to destroy him with a FALSE story (the madrassah) that they STILL haven't retracted?
Right-wing humor is restricted to mocking the vulnerable because it can't mock its own power structure without holding itself accountable. Left-wing humor is rooted in pointing out how dangerous, phony, hypocritical, immoral, or just plain illegal the inherent authoritarianism of conservatism can be. And while that may present a problem for "professional" political comedians, we "amateurs" are doing just fine!
rocktivity
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Mocking authority is what left wing comics excel at and it is what makes them funny. I laugh the hardest watching the Daily Show when Jon Stewart simply puts some clips of the news together. It is irony, something the Repub so called comics don't get. They take themselves way too seriously and just don't get it. They don't get Colbert and that he is essentially mocking the idea of what a conservative is.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)For the most part, that's a core of comedy. Being able to see the humor in our daily lives and beliefs.
Conservatives just mock other people. Which gets old and worn out really fast.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)They're pretty smart
But they don't even know
What a joke is
--Talking Heads, Fear of Music, 1980
unblock
(52,116 posts)much of comedy involves telling a (possibly very brief) story where social norms lead the audience to expect a certain, familiar conclusion, and then the comedian throws in a curveball and takes it in a surprising direction. done properly, this violation of social norms can be not only humerous, but an interesting commentary on our social conventions.
the modern right-wing has become based on strict loyalty to official catch-phrases and code words. there's ZERO empathy or tolerance for competing views, which amount to blasphemy or betrayal.
the i'm-right-you're-evil mindset doesn't lend itself to exploring grey areas and getting the audience expecting to go one way then taken another.
so, sure, they can have their go at weak, base humor like making joke about obama being a muslim or something. or self-depricating jokes about being of a certain religion or being a redneck or whatever.
so the kind of routine that really gets you going for a full set, an hbo special, that sort of thing, well, right-wingers just don't seem to be good at it.
they're much better at anger, which usually doesn't work well for comedians (don rickles has a good run with it, though i never cared for him; and to some extent lewis black, although he seems to have too much fun with it....)
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)and conservatives don't approve of either. They can't handle hearing anything they didn't expect to hear in advance.
It's why Bob Hope's comedy was basically zombified after the late Fifties or so.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)alterfurz
(2,469 posts)--they have a mean streak, and think it is the same thing."
Read somewhere years ago, but don't recall who deserves credit!
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,311 posts).... gay basher, cop impersonator, running a blind man in to a door jamb and dog torturer - all for 'good fun.'
spanone
(135,791 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,392 posts)Jon Stewart can occasionally point out (and poke fun at) at foibles by the left but most people on the left just don't say or do a lot of outright dumb and/or ridiculous stuff for the Dennis Millers of the world to gin up the joke factory with.
OverBurn
(942 posts)I recently watched his last comedy concert and it was just an embarrassment of non funny. Other than Miller I can't even think of any other right wing comics.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)I asked, "Madonna wasn't available?"
rocktivity
RZM
(8,556 posts)I caught a bit of his most recent stand-up routine and I agree it was really bad. But that kind of thing isn't all that uncommon either. Relatively few entertainers can sustain a winning streak for decades at a time. Some can, but most can't. Eventually you run out of steam.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)When he was on SNL other people were writing his material and even then I didn't think he was funny. When he started doing stand up his material was either largely stolen or simply recycled material like the French stink or marriage/toilet seat jokes. When he decided he was a conservative his shit just got that much more unfunny.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Something broke.
TlalocW
(15,374 posts)Even when he was spouting somewhat more liberal jokes, the smug look on his face, and his incessant need to show how smarter he was than you with the 5 minutes dissertations that referenced everything from, "War and Peace," to Hitchcock movies just was too much. Being the Weekend Update anchor at least forced him to try and keep things a little shorter, but other than that, no one ever used him in any of the other sketches, and apparently if he wrote any sketches, they didn't get used (since the comedians mainly write skits for themselves to be the stars in) because all he could do was Dennis Miller/Smarmy-Jackass-Who's-Full-of-Himself. I remember one skit he was in, and he was playing a teenage son in a dysfunctional family at Christmas, and it was just painful to see him attempt to "broaden" himself and "act." Even when he gets bit parts in movies - I'm thinking stuff like, "Joe Dirt," - his character is just him. Phil Hartman and Jon Lovitz could disappear into their roles, especially when they were fast-talking 1940s archetypes (this is gonna be the way it is, see?). Hell, once, on Weekend Update, they had a special correspondent who was Dennis Miller, played by Dana Carvey, and he nailed the Miller character perfectly.
I listen to a comedy radio station, and they play him every now and then. There was one time that he stepped outside himself and told a touching and humorous story about getting to bring his mother to a private dinner with Frank Sinatra and how gracious he was. Otherwise, it's just his talking about, "how we need to take those cats in the Middle-East out, cha-cha."
TlalocW
Response to cleanhippie (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann, George Bush, the list of Republican comedians is a long one.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)And then it is not funny "haha," it's funny in the head!
Taverner
(55,476 posts)I mean, the main guy, he was FAT! Isn't that funny!!! And guess what? He liked to eat! Food! Cuz he's FAT!!!! Haw haw haw!
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)The four people who actually saw it loved it!
VOX
(22,976 posts)No offense to any Albanians, of course.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Sorry - I couldn't resist
No offense to any Albanians or Vibrators
Homer12
(1,866 posts)It would mean self evalution, and that is the last thing rightwingers want to do.
You can't laugh at yourself when you think your 100% correct at all times.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)humility is necessary for comics to succeed, and that's something that RW'ers lack.
applegrove
(118,492 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Also, to be able to get laughs about the other side in politics, you also have to be able to laugh at yourself, and conservatives these days refuse to accept that anything they do can ever be mistaken or absurd. When you believe your viewpoint to be infallible, you don't have the internal space in which to see humor.
VOX
(22,976 posts)And they comment on social ills and inequities from the outsider's point of view. Not surprisingly, many of them happen to be something other than WASPs, and their frequent targets are the wealthy, the powerful, the privileged and of some "higher" social status:
W.C. Fields, Groucho Marx, Lenny Bruce, Godfrey Cambridge, George Carlin, Richard Pryor, Jonathan Winters -- just a quick short list of outsiders who specialized in sticking it to the powerful. (I'm sure I've left off some great ones.)
Same applies to the best humorist/writers: S.J. Perelman, George S. Kaufman, Dorothy Parker, Robert Benchley, etc.
One would be hard-pressed to find even ONE successful conservative/rich/right-wing comic or humorist. And no, Dennis Miller isn't funny.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)Many of the major successful comedians, particularly those successful with younger crowds, specialize in racial and sexual humor that isn't exactly liberal in nature or target. Daniel Tosh, for example, is highly successful, and I'd be highly pressed to call his humor liberal in nature. With the rise of the Internet, there is also a rise in a kind of anti-social "inappropriate" humor, where the comedy is generated by comedians saying things they're not supposed to say.
I happen to love inappropriate humor. The more inappropriate it is, the better I like it. My friends (in their 20s and 30s) also latch onto it as a matter of course.
I would never ever ever post it on a place like DU. People would be outraged by the content.
I don't find liberal vs conservative a good yardstick to measure humor or comedy by. The measurement is always "What is socially acceptable and what is not." The comedians who violate what is not supposed to be said tend to find more success with younger generations. If society's prevailing sentiments are liberal (as I believe they now are), anti-PC humor will find a niche just as it has. When society's prevailing cultural standards were more conservative, you had a lot of liberal comedians puncturing those sensibilities.
It ebbs and flows, but I don't think political labels apply. And humor is, as always, subjective. I don't find political humor totally hilarious like many people around here do. I'm not a partisan, so oftentimes what gets posted on DU as the funniest thing ever often seems to me like an applause line (a "joke" that isn't really funny, but which reinforces a pre-existing political belief and is thus considered good). I find applause lines the laziest and least entertaining forms of humor. It's why I don't get, say, Margaret Cho, while many of my LGBT friends worship her. She's just parroting their beliefs back at them, which is fine, but I don't think she's actually funny or creative or even particularly clever. She bores the ever-lovin' out of me.
But, YMMV.
dflprincess
(28,072 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Greybnk48
(10,162 posts)Snarkoleptic
(5,996 posts)Methinks.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)How could he say that when the security and defense apparatus of the strongest and most heavily-armed nation on the whole freaking planet was defeated by 19 guys with box-cutters?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Those are their core principles. They make fun of people that stick up for people's rights and call them hateful names. That is what passes for humor if you are a conservative.
Telly Savalas
(9,841 posts)Unfortunately their irony is too subtle so people elect them to office. After that happens they realize they've got a good thing going and hush up about how their schtick is just a big joke.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Historical biographers will look back and marvel at Glenn Beck. Probably will compare him to the olde-time snake oil peddlers who went around with the traveling circuses.
lob1
(3,820 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
He's right. They're just mean. That's not funny. It just shows how self centered they are and how vengeful against those who disagree with them.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Stargleamer
(1,985 posts)the only trouble was that I think I was laughing at him, not with him.
Gothmog
(144,919 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 7, 2022, 07:01 PM - Edit history (1)
Conservatives are bad at satire. This site is so weak and unfunny that it reminds me of this cartoon